San Mateo County Superior Courts - Online Case Search

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITHOUT PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (DISMISSAL AS TO CROSS-COMPLAINT OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY).

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (ENTIRE ACTION DISMISSED).

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; SETTLEMENT; COMMENT; COMMENT; (UNCONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT FILED).

CASE DISMISSED.

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; SWOPE V. RAYMOND; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL; COMMENT; COMMENT; (ORDER DISTRIBUTING MONIES DEPOSITED WITH COURT IN 16-CIV-01192 AND CIV 538486 AND DISMISSING THE CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS IN THEIR ENTIRETY.); PARTY; NAMES: LIBERTY, LOUIS A.; LIBERTY, OTTO & GUILLEN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; OTTO, IAN; DOES 1-1000; LAW OFFICE OF OTTO & GUILLEN, APC; GUILLEN, ALEXANDER A.; ROES 1 THROUGH 50; ROSNER, BARRY & BABBITT, LLP; HAMCOR, INC.; CARBAJAL, GUADALUPE; LIBERTY, LOUIS A; 6450 MOTORS, LLC; BREAZEALE, KEVIN; HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA.

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; FOILES ROBERT D; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PARTY; NAME: CARBAJAL, GUADALUPE.

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (CASE DISMISSED PER REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FILED 9-11-17).

JURY TRIAL. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER KARESH JONATHAN E. HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL COMMENT JURY TRIAL. TIME ESTIMATE: 7 DAYS

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; PARTY; NAME: LEWIS RALPH J; COMMENT; COMMENT; (); PARTY; NAME: LEWIS, RALPH J.

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; NOVAK LISA A.; JUDGMENT TYPE; COURT FINDING; JUDGMENT - MONETARY AWARD; AWARDED TO: SHAFFER, CHRIS; SHAFFER, SHARON; AWARDED AGAINST: SALAMAT, MASOUD; AMOUNT; DAMAGES: $19,500.00; TOTAL: $19500.00; PARTY; NAMES: SHAFFER, CHRIS; SHAFFER, SHARON; SALAMAT, MASOUD.

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; KARESH JONATHAN E.; JUDGMENT TYPE; JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT - MONETARY AWARD; AWARDED TO: KENNEY, MARK JOSEPH; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYTR; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION; MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIERS 2007-1; BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,; DOES 1 THROUGH 20; CORRIVEAU, JULIE ELLEN; RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.; MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC; AWARDED AGAINST: HARRELL, WALTER; HARRELL, BONNIE; COMMENT: JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFFS SHALL RECOVER NOTHING FROM DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANTS MAY SEEK TO RECOVER ITS RESPECTIVE COSTS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS.

REMITTITUR. ADDITIONAL INFO: REMITTITUR A152380 COMMENT A152380

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER FOILES ROBERT D HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON VACATED COMMENT DEPT: 21 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

COMPLEX CASE STATUS CONFERENCE. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER GRANDSAERT JOHN L. HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON VACATED COMMENT SET AS PER STIP AND ORDER FILED ON 08/30/16

CONVERSION HEARING. ADDITIONAL INFO: COMMENT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER FOILES ROBERT D HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON VACATED COMMENT DEPT: 21 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISPOSITIONED; PARTY; NAME: WUEBBELS BRIAN; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: CHATILA, AHMAD; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: TERRAFORM GLOBAL, INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: SUNEDISON, INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GLENVIEW OFFSHORE OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GLENVIEW CAPITAL OPPORTUNITY FUND, L.P.; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: MCS CAPITAL MARKETS LLC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA), INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GENERALE, SOCIETE; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: SANTANDER; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: CREDIT SUISSE; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: SMBC NIKKO SECURITIES AMERICA,INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GLENVIEW CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LTD; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: BTG PACTUAL US CAPITAL LLC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: ZWIRN, RANDY H; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: WILLIAMS, JAMES B; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GLENVIEW INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS, L.P.; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: TESORIERE, STEVEN; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: PROCTOR, GEORGANNE; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: DALEY, CLAYTON, JR; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: BLACKMORE, PETER; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: ALVAREZ, ANTONIO R; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: HERNANDEZ, EMMANUEL; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: HERNANDEZ, ALEJANDRO; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: AVENIER, JEREMY; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: TRUONG, MARTIN; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: ZORNOZA, CARLOS DOMENECH; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT; PARTY; NAME: GLENVIEW CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.; COMMENT: 0001 COMPLAINT.

COMPLEX CASE STATUS CONFERENCE. ADDITIONAL INFO: ORIGINAL TYPE COMPLEX CASE STATUS CONFERENCE CIV MINUTE ORDER JUDICIAL OFFICER GRANDSAERT JOHN L. HEARING TIME 9:00 AM RESULT HELD -

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; PARTY; NAMES: CAMPOS EPC LLC; RICHINS, CORY; COMMENT: PER REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AS TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED 04/04/2018 OF CAMPOS EPC, LLC AND CORY RICHINS ONLY.

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; PARTY; NAME: MOUNTAIN F. ENTERPRISES INC.; COMMENT: DISMISSAL OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED APRIL 4, 2018 WITH REGARD TO MOUNTAIN F. ENTERPRISES, INC (DOE 5), ONLY.

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER. ADDITIONAL INFO: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER

ORDER. ADDITIONAL INFO: ORDER

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; WEINER MARIE S.; JUDGMENT TYPE; STAY/REMOVAL; COMMENT; COMMENT; (STIPULATION STAYING CASE ORDERED BY JUDGE WEINER).

AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING. ADDITIONAL INFO: AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ORDER APPROVING ALLOCATION OF ATTORNEY'S FEES BETWEEN CO-LEAD COUNSEL COMMENT ORDER APPROVING ALLOCATION OF ATTORNEY'S FEES BETWEEN CO-LEAD COUNSEL

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; WEINER MARIE S.; JUDGMENT TYPE; COURT FINDING; COMMENT; COMMENT; ((IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) THE STIPULATION AND THE SETTLEMENT EMBODIED THEREIN FOR $5 MILLION ARE APPROVED AS FAIR, REASONABLE, AND ADEQUATE, AND THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO CONSUMMATE THE SETTLEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE STIPULATION. (2) PLAINTIFFS, ALL CLASS MEMBERS, AND DEFENDANTS ARE HEREBY BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT AS SET FORTH IN THE STIPULATION. (3) THE ACTION AND ALL CLAIMS THAT ARE OR HAVE EVER BEEN CONTAINED THEREIN AS WELL AS ALL OF THE RELEASED CLAIMS, ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFFS, THE CLASS MEMBERS, AND ALL OTHER RELEASING PERSONS. (4) ALL RELEASED DEFENDANTS'S PARTIES AND RELEASED PLAINTIFFS' PARTIES ARE HEREBY RELEASED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION. (5) EACH PARTY IS TO BEAR HIS, HER, OR ITS COSTS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THE STIPULATION. (6) UPON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SETTLEMENT, PLAINTIFFS AND ALL CLASS MEMBERS, OR BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THEIR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, REPRESENTATIVES, ATTORNEYS, AND AGENTS IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS SUCH, SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE, AND BY OPERATION OF THIS FINAL JUDGMENT SHALL HAVE, FULLY, FINALLY, AND FOREVER WAIVED, RELEASED, RELINQUISHED, AND DISCHARGED ALL RELEASED CLAIMS AGAINST THE RELEASED DEFENDANTS' PARTIES, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH CLASS MEMBER EXECUTED AND DELIVERED AS A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH CLASS MEMBER SHARED IN THE SETTLEMENT FUND, AND WHETHER OR NOT SUCH CLASS MEMBER OBJECTED TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE PROPOSED PLAN OF ALLOCATION, OR ANY FEE AND EXPENSE APPLICATION. (7.) UPON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SETTLEMENT, EACH OF THE DEFENDANTS AND THE RELEASED DEFENDANTS' PARTIES SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE, AND BY OPERATION OF THIS FINAL JUDGMENT SHALL HAVE, FULLY, FINALLY, AND FOREVER RELEASED AND DISCHARGED ALL RELEASED DEFENDANTS' CLAIMS AGAINST THE RELEASED PLAINTIFFS' PARTIES. 8) ANY CLASS MEMBERS WHO HAVE NOT TIMELY SUBMITTED ANY ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL OBJECTION TO THE SETTLEMENT IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN THE NOTICE ARE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ANY OBJECTIONS BY APPEAL, COLLATERAL ATTACH, OR OTHERWISE. (9) ALL CLASS MEMBERS WHO HAVE FAILED TO PROPERLY FILE REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION (REQUEST TO OP-OUT) FROM THE CLASS ARE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STIPULATION AND THIS FINAL JUDGMENT, AND ARE DEEMED TO HAVE RELEASED AND FOREVER DISCHARGED THE RELEASED DEFENDANTS' PARTIES FROM ALL RELEASED CLAIMS AS PROVIDED IN THE STIPULATION AND HEREIN. A LIST OF ALL PERSONS (IF AN) WHO VALIDLY AND TIMELY FILED A REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT 1. (10. ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE STIPULATION ARE INCORPORATED INTO THIS ORDER AS IF FULLY REWRITTEN HEREIN. TO THE EXTENT THAT THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION, THE STIPULATION SHALL CONTROL. (110 PLAINTIFFS, ALL CLASS MEMBERS AND ALL OTHER RELEASING PERSONS ARE HEREBY BARRED AND PERMANENTLY ENJOINED FROM INSTITUTING, COMMENCING, MAINTAINING, OR PROSECUTING IN ANY COURT OF TRIBUNAL ANY OF THE RELEASED CLAIMS AGAINST ANY OF RELEASED DEFENDANTS' PARTIES. (12) DEFENDANTS AND EACH OF THE RELEASED DEFENDANTS'S PARTIES ARE HEREBY BARRED AND PERMANENTLY ENJOINED FROM INSTITUTING, COMMENCING, MAINTAINING, OR PROSECUTING ANY OF THE RELEASED DEFENDANTS' CLAIMS AGAINST ANY OF THE RELEASED PLAINTIFFS' PARTIES, INCLUDING PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL. (13) ANY REJECTION OF OR MODIFICATION OR CHANGE TO THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION THAT MA HEREAFTER BE ENTERED OR APPROVED SHALL IN NO WAY DISTURB OR AFFECT THIS FINAL JUDGMENT THE RELEASES PROVIDED HEREUNDER. (14) THE COURT HEREBY DECREES THAT THE STIPULATION, THE SETTLEMENT, AND ANY ACT PERFORMED OR DOCUMENT EXECUTED PURSUANT TO OR IN FURTHERANCE OF THE STIPULATION OR THE SETTLEMENT: (A) SHALL NOT BE OFFERED OR RECEIVED AGAINST DEFENDANTS OR ANY OF THE RELEASED DEFENDANTS' DEPENDANTS' 'S PARTIES AS EVIDENCE OF A PRESUMPTION, CONCESSION, OR ADMISSION BY DEPENDANTS' WITH RESPECT TO THE TRUTH OF ANY FACT ALLEGED BY PLAINTIFFS OR THE VALIDITY OF ANY CLAIM THAT HAS BEEN OR COULD HAVE BEEN ASSERTED IN THE ACTION OR ANY LITIGATION, OR THE DEFICIENCY OF ANY DEFENSE THAT HAS BEEN OR COULD HAVE BEEN ASSERTED IN THE ACTION OR ANY LITIGATION; (B) SHALL NOT BE OFFERED OR RECEIVED AGAINST DEPENDANTS' OR ANY OF THE RELEASED DEPENDANTS' PARTIES AS EVIDENCE OF PRESUMPTION, CONCESSION, OR ADMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY LIABILITY, NEGLIGENCE, FAULT, OR WRONGDOING, OR IN ANY WAY REFERRED TO FOR ANY OTHER REASON AS AGAINST DEPENDANTS', IN ANY OTHER CIVIL, CRIMINAL, OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN ANY COURT, ARBITRATION PROCEEDING, ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY, OR FORUM OR TRIBUNAL IN WHICH THE DEPENDANTS' ARE OR BECOME PARTIES, OTHER THAN SUCH PROCEEDINGS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS STIPULATION; AND (C) SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS OR RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE AS AN ADMISSION, CONCESSION, OR PRESUMPTION AGAINST ANY PLAINTIFF OR ANY OF THE CLASS MEMBERS THAT ANY OF THEIR CLAIMS ARE WITHOUT MERIT, OR THAT ANY DEFENSES ASSERTED BY DEFENDANT'S HAVE ANY MERIT. (15.) WITHOUT AFFECTING THE FINALITY OF THIS JUDGMENT IN ANY WAY, THIS COURT RETAINS CONTINUING JURISDICTION OVER (A)IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS SETTLEMENT AND ANY AWARD OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE SETTLEMENT FUND, INCLUDING INTEREST EARNED THEREON; (B) DISPOSITION OF THE SETTLEMENT FUND; (C) ALL PARTIES HERETO FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUING, ENFORCING AND ADMINISTERING THE SETTLEMENT. (16) PER STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT THE COURT FINDS THAT DURING THE COURSE OF THE ACTION, THE PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AT ALL TIMES ACTED PROFESSIONALLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, INCLUDING SS128.7 THEREOF AND ALL SIMILAR STATUTES OR COURT RULES WITH RESPECT TO THE LITIGATION OR DEFENSE OF THIS ACTION. (17) IN THE EVENT THAT THE STIPULATION IS TERMINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS, (I) THIS FINAL JUDGMENT SHALL BE RENDERED NULL AND VOID AND SHALL BE VACATED NUNC PRO TUNC, AND (II) THIS ACTION SHALL PROCEED AS PROVIDED IN ~33 OF THE STIPULATION. (18) THERE IS NO JUST REASON FOR DELAY, AND THIS IS A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER AS WHEN IT IS RECEIVED FOR FILING. (19) FINAL JUDGMENT SHALL BE AND HEREBY IS ENTERED HEREIN. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2018 AT THE COURTHOUSE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN MATEO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE JUDE MARIE S. WEINER JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT.).

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER; WEINER MARIE S.; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITHOUT PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (); PARTY; NAME: SAMRA, JAGDIP; COMMENT: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF PLTF JAGDIP SAMRA'S CLAIMS FILED 2/1/17.

CONVERSION MINUTE. ADDITIONAL INFO: COMMENT HOC: HEARING OFF CALENDAR. REASON: PER JUDGE WEINER.

CONVERSION HEARING. ADDITIONAL INFO: CMC NOTICE (2) COMMENT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

DISBURSEMENT. ADDITIONAL INFO: COMMENT PROCESSED DISBURSEMENT OTHER OF $1000 TO ROBBINS ARROYO LLP DOC/REF 1908001850

REQUEST. ADDITIONAL INFO: REQUEST REQUEST FOR REFUND OF $1000.00 SENT TO FINANCE DIVISION ATTN: JOHN CRUZ COMMENT REQUEST FOR REFUND OF $1000.00 SENT TO FINANCE DIVISION ATTN: JOHN CRUZ

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITHOUT PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (CASE DISMISSED PER REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FILED ON 10-04-17).

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; SETTLEMENT; COMMENT; COMMENT; (CONDITIONAL CROSS DEFENDANT.).

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE COMPLAINT AND CROSS-COMPLAINT).

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER BUCHWALD GERALD J. HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON VACATED

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER FOILES ROBERT D HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON VACATED COMMENT DEPT: 21 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

COMPLEX CASE STATUS CONFERENCE. ADDITIONAL INFO: JUDICIAL OFFICER MASTER CALENDAR - HEARING TIME 9:00 AM CANCEL REASON VACATED COMMENT DEPT: PJLM COMPLEX CASE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING CONTINUED FROM 8/24/16 TO 11/2/16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING COMPLEX CASE STATUS CONFERENCE SIGNED BY JUDGE GRANDSAERT ON 8/16/16

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; DISMISSAL - WITH PREJUDICE; COMMENT; COMMENT; (COMPLAINT AND CORSS COMPLAINT DISMISSED PER REQUESTS FOR DISMISSAL FILED 3-28-17).

DISPOSITION: JUDGMENT; JUDGMENT TYPE; SETTLEMENT; COMMENT; COMMENT; (CONDITIONAL).