U.S. Courts Of Appeals - Prisoner Case Search

FORWARDING MOTION FOR IFP RECEIVED FROM APPELLANT MR. ROBERT T. MCCLURE TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR FILING.FEE DEADLINE CANCELED. [19-50430] (MRW) [ENTERED: 07/02/2019 02:54 PM]

CLERK ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO PAY FILING FEE FILED BY APPELLANT MR. ROBERT T. MCCLURE [ # 9066083-2 ] FEE DEADLINE UPDATED TO 06/27/2019 FOR APPELLANT ROBERT T. MCCLURE [19-50430] (CNF) [ENTERED: 06/03/2019 10:50 AM]

(#3) DEFENDANT NOT SERVED IN DISTRICT COURT, COMPLAINT DISMISSED PRIOR TO SERVICE. (SSS) [ENTERED: 05/20/2021 01:42 PM]

(#2) THE CASE MANAGER FOR THIS CASE IS: SHARDAY SWAIN (SSS) [ENTERED: 05/20/2021 01:42 PM]

JUDGMENT FILED - APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, RALPH R. ERICKSON AND L. STEVEN GRASZ ADP MAR 2022 [5139007] [22-1454] (HAG) [ENTERED: 03/22/2022 09:06 AM]

CASE SUBMITTED AD PANEL SUBMISSION BEFORE JUDGES RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, RALPH R. ERICKSON, L. STEVEN GRASZ IN ST. LOUIS [5138989] [22-1454] (HAG) [ENTERED: 03/22/2022 08:49 AM]

EXTENSION RECEIVED FOR APPELLANT MR. BLAKE ROBERTSON. EXTENSION GRANTED TO AND INCLUDING 06/29/2020. FEE DEADLINE UPDATED TO 06/29/2020 FOR APPELLANT BLAKE ROBERTSON [20-10442] (MFY) [ENTERED: 06/03/2020 01:43 PM]

INITIAL CASE CHECK BY ATTORNEY ADVISOR COMPLETE, ACTION: CASE OK TO PROCESS. [9312297-2] INITIAL AA CHECK DUE SATISFIED.. FEE DUE ON 05/28/2020 FOR APPELLANT BLAKE ROBERTSON [20-10442] (MRW) [ENTERED: 05/13/2020 08:58 AM]

(#4) ORDER RE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. [ # 3 ] THIS APPEAL IS SUBJECT TO THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT AND THEREFORE ALL PROCEEDINGS ARE SUSPENDED PENDING THE ASSESSMENT AND PAYMENT OF ANY NECESSARY FEES. SEE NEWLIN V. HELMAN, 123 F.3D 429, 434 (7TH CIR. 1997). A REVIEW OF THE DOCKET INDICATES THAT THE APPELLANT'S FEE STATUS HAS NOT YET BEEN DETERMINED. ACCORDINGLY, THE MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE APPELLANT SHALL FILE THE CIRCUIT RULE 3(C) DOCKETING STATEMENT AND TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION SHEET, IF ONE IS NECESSARY, WITH THIS COURT BY JANUARY 26, 2021. FURTHER, THE APPELLANT SHALL EITHER PAY THE $505.00 FILING FEE OR FILE A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS IN THE DISTRICT COURT BY JANUARY 26, 2021. [4] [7131562] CMD [20-3324] (AD) [ENTERED: 01/04/2021 08:52 AM]

(#3) PRO SE MOTION FILED BY APPELLANT STEVEN BROWN TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE IFP FORMS. (FORWARDED FROM THE DISTRICT COURT).. [3] [7131410] [20-3324] (CM) [ENTERED: 12/30/2020 03:37 PM]

(#5) CLERK ORDER FILED (DEPUTY CLERK CKP) PRISONER COMPLETED AUTHORIZATION FEE ORDER. [11688245] (CKP) [ENTERED: 05/12/2020 12:44 PM]

(#4) RECEIVED PLRA AUTHORIZATION RESPONSE FROM APPELLANT. DATED 05/04/2020. [11685159] (NAC) [ENTERED: 05/08/2020 01:09 PM]

RESPONSE BRIEF ON BEHALF OF APPELLANT TAYLOR MENDEZ TO SUMMARY ACTION, FILED. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATED 06/26/2019. SERVICE MADE BY ECF. (PDB) [ENTERED: 06/26/2019 11:40 AM]

LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT ADVISING THAT THE CASE WILL BE SUBMITTED TO A PANEL OF THIS COURT FOR POSSIBLE SUMMARY ACTION. (JW) [ENTERED: 05/15/2019 11:51 AM]

APPEARANCE FILED BY MICHAEL D GOOCH FOR APPELLANT MR. STEVEN L. PINDER W/SERVICE 11/23/2022 [5221034] [22-3050] (MDG) [ENTERED: 11/23/2022 03:25 PM]

BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: APPENDIX DUE ON 12/23/2022. BRIEF OF APPELLANT STEVEN L. PINDER DUE 12/23/2022. APPELLEE BRIEF IS DUE 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE COURT ISSUES THE NOTICE OF DOCKET ACTIVITY FILING THE BRIEF OF APPELLANT. [5220654] [22-3050] (CAH) [ENTERED: 11/23/2022 08:58 AM]

USDC ORDER DENYING IFP AS TO APPELLANT TAVARES KEITH WAS FILED ON 05/29/2019. DOCKET ENTRY 80. [ENTERED: 06/03/2019 07:52 AM]

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FILED BY ATTORNEY JANE ELIZABETH MCBATH FOR APPELLEE USA. ON THE SAME DAY THE CIP IS SERVED, THE PARTY FILING IT MUST ALSO COMPLETE THE COURT'S WEB-BASED STOCK TICKER SYMBOL CERTIFICATE AT THE LINK HERE HTTP://WWW.CA11.USCOURTS.GOV/WEB-BASED-CIP OR ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE. SEE 11TH CIR. R. 26.1-2(B). [19-11350] (ECF: JANE MCBATH) [ENTERED: 05/01/2019 11:57 AM]

APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED BY APPELLANT TYREN ALI. NUMBER OF COPIES: 1. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATED 05/07/2020. BRIEF DUE 07/09/2020 FOR APPELLEE ROBERT HAZELWOOD. [20-1414] (CMP) [ENTERED: 06/09/2020 09:42 AM]

PLEADING TENDERED: BRIEF FILED BY APPELLANT TYREN ALI. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATED 05/07/2020. [20-1414] (CMP) [ENTERED: 05/08/2020 04:35 PM]

(#7) ORDER FILED: IT IS ORDERED THAT APPEAL NO. 21-5138 IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE OCTOBER 26 ORDER THAT SLIDER APPEALED HAS BEEN VACATED BY THE DISTRICT COURT, AND, AS A RESULT, THERE IS NO ACTIVE CASE OR CONTROVERSY PRESENTED HERE. DECISION NOT FOR PUBLICATION. JEFFREY S. SUTTON, CIRCUIT JUDGE; DEBORAH L. COOK, CIRCUIT JUDGE AND CHAD A. READLER, CIRCUIT JUDGE. (MMP) [ENTERED: 03/31/2021 02:56 PM]

(#6) COPY OF DISTRICT COURT ORDER FILED REGARDING A FEE RELATED MATTER. (MMP) [ENTERED: 03/22/2021 03:26 PM]

(#3) FILED CLERK ORDER (DEPUTY CLERK: LKK): (ECF FILING) FILED BY APPELLANT LUIS GONZALAS; GRANTING MOTION [ # 2 ] (ECF FILING) MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF FILED BY APPELLANT LUIS GONZALAS. APPELLANT LUIS GONZALAS OPENING BRIEF DUE 07/31/2023. APPELLEES ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, JEREMY BEAN, RONALD OLIVER, JAMES SCALLY AND JULIE WILLIAMS ANSWERING BRIEF DUE 08/30/2023. THE OPTIONAL REPLY BRIEF IS DUE 21 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE ANSWERING BRIEF. [12702306] (LKK) [ENTERED: 04/25/2023 10:04 AM]

(#2) FILED (ECF) APPELLANT LUIS GONZALAS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF UNTIL 07/31/2023. DATE OF SERVICE: 04/24/2023. [12701401] [23-15292] (KIRSCHNER, COURTNEY) [ENTERED: 04/24/2023 11:43 AM]

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-70033 AFFIRMED ] JUDGE: CDK , JUDGE: EGJ , JUDGE: CH MANDATE PULL DATE IS 08/31/2015 [14-70033]

NON DISPOSITIVE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. JUDGE: CDK , JUDGE: EGJ , JUDGE: CH; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FILED BY APPELLANT MR. ROBERT LESLIE ROBERSON, III [7847367-2] [14-70033]

(#3) RECEIVED COPY OF DISTRICT COURT ORDER FILED ON 05/07/2020. ON APRIL 13, 2020, I ISSUED MY OPINION AND ORDER 54 DENYING PETITIONERS MOTION TO VACATE OR CORRECT SENTENCE VIA 2255 47 . AT THAT TIME, I FAILED TO RULE ON WHETHER A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULD BE ISSUED. I DO SO NOW: BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, I DECLINE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. 28 U.S.C. 2253(C)(2). ORDERED BY JUDGE MICHAEL W. MOSMAN. (KMS) MODIFIED ON 5/7/2020- COPY MAILED TO TERRY LINTOTT (KMS). [11684632] (NAC) [ENTERED: 05/08/2020 09:43 AM]

(#2) FILED ORDER (APPELLATE COMMISSIONER): THE DISTRICT COURT HAS NOT ISSUED OR DECLINED TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN THIS APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURTS APRIL 13, 2020 ORDER, WHICH APPEARS TO ARISE UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2255. THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF GRANTING OR DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AT THE COURTS EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. SEE 28 U.S.C. 2253(C); FED. R. APP. P. 22(B); UNITED STATES V. ASRAR, 116 F.3D 1268, 1270 (9TH CIR. 1997). IF THE DISTRICT COURT ISSUES A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, THE COURT SHOULD SPECIFY WHICH ISSUE OR ISSUES MEET THE REQUIRED SHOWING. SEE 28 U.S.C. 2253(C)(3); ASRAR, 116 F.3D AT 1270. UNDER ASRAR, IF THE DISTRICT COURT DECLINES TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE, THE COURT SHOULD STATE ITS REASONS WHY A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED, AND THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL FORWARD TO THIS COURT THE RECORD WITH THE ORDER DENYING THE CERTIFICATE. SEE ASRAR, 116 F.3D AT 1270. THE CLERK SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE DISTRICT COURT. (PRO SE) [11682601] (CKP) [ENTERED: 05/06/2020 01:51 PM]

(#10) RULE 42(B) MANDATE ISSUED. ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 7:22-CV-00173-JPJ-PMS. MAILED TO: JEFFREY D. CHERIPKA. [1001390447] [23-6513] CP [ENTERED: 06/23/2023 03:25 PM]

(#9) ORDER FILED GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL PURSUANT TO FRAP 42(B) [ # 8 ]. COPIES TO ALL PARTIES. MAILED TO: JEFFREY CHERIPKA. [1001390438] [23-6513] CP [ENTERED: 06/23/2023 03:21 PM]

(#4) FILED ORDER (JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN AND BRIDGET S. BADE) THE REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (DOCKET ENTRY NO. [ # 2 ] & [ # 3 ]) IS DENIED BECAUSE THE UNDERLYING 28 U.S.C. 2254 PETITION FAILS TO STATE ANY FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS DEBATABLE AMONG JURISTS OF REASON. SEE 28 U.S.C. 2253(C)(2)-(3); GONZALEZ V. THALER, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (WHEN ... THE DISTRICT COURT DENIES RELIEF ON PROCEDURAL GROUNDS, THE PETITIONER SEEKING A COA MUST SHOW BOTH THAT JURISTS OF REASON WOULD FIND IT DEBATABLE WHETHER THE PETITION STATES A VALID CLAIM OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND THAT JURISTS OF REASON WOULD FIND IT DEBATABLE WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT WAS CORRECT IN ITS PROCEDURAL RULING.) (QUOTING SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). ANY PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. DENIED. [12671939] (ABT) [ENTERED: 03/10/2023 04:07 PM]

(#3) FILED APPELLANT JESSE STEPHEN KING MOTION MOTION. DEFICIENCIES: NONE. [12650553] (JFF) [ENTERED: 02/10/2023 09:52 AM]

(#5) APPEARANCE FILED FOR RESPONDENT USA BY TERRY M. CUSHING. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: 06/22/2021. [21-5603] (TMC) [ENTERED: 06/22/2021 01:02 PM]

(#4) RULING LETTER SENT DIRECTING MOVANT BRIAN SEAN MCCLENDON TO FILE A CORRECTED SECOND SUCCESSIVE HABEAS MOTION. CORRECTED MOTION DUE 07/21/2021. (CAM) [ENTERED: 06/21/2021 12:41 PM]

(#2) THE CASE MANAGER FOR THIS CASE IS: JULIE A. CONNOR (JAC) [ENTERED: 12/07/2020 11:13 AM]

(#1) PRISONER CASE DOCKETED WITH CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED IN DISTRICT COURT ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2020. NOTICE FILED BY APPELLANT MR. LIONEL VARNES. TRANSCRIPT NEEDED: N. (JAC) [ENTERED: 12/07/2020 11:07 AM]

(#3) FILED SEVENTH CIRCUIT TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION SHEET BY APPELLANT MERRICK T. THOMPSON. [3] [6986851] [19-1246] (CAG) [ENTERED: 02/25/2019 04:21 PM]

(#2) CIRCUIT RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND APPEARANCE FILED BY ATTORNEY PATRICIA C. MCMATH FOR APPELLEE RICHARD BROWN. [2] [6984556] (L-YES; E-YES; R-YES) [19-1246] --[EDITED 02/14/2019 BY AP- TO REFLECT TERMINATION AND ADDITION OF COUNSEL] (MCMATH, PATRICIA) [ENTERED: 02/14/2019 02:30 PM]

(#3) APPEARANCE FILED FOR APPELLEES MICHAEL EUBANKS AND COLLIN PERRY BY JOSEPH Y. HO (P77390). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: 07/15/2021. [21-2598] (JYH) [ENTERED: 07/15/2021 03:05 PM]

(#2) THE CASE MANAGER FOR THIS CASE IS: C. ANTHONY MILTON (CAM) [ENTERED: 06/15/2021 10:27 AM]

INITIAL CASE CHECK BY ATTORNEY ADVISOR COMPLETE, ACTION: CASE OK TO PROCESS. [9075161-2] INITIAL AA CHECK DUE SATISFIED.. FEE OR MOTION FOR IFP IN DC DUE ON 08/07/2019 FOR APPELLANT ROBERT MILLER [19-40521] (LLL) [ENTERED: 06/13/2019 11:54 AM]

PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. ROBERT MILLER [19-40521] (CCR) [ENTERED: 06/06/2019 11:47 AM]

(#5) CJA APPOINTMENT FOR ATTORNEY MR. DAVID ADLER FOR MR. JOSEPH RAYMOND WEEKS. COUNSEL MUST USE THE EVOUCHER SYSTEM TO FILE THE VOUCHER AT DISPOSITION OF THE CASE. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: STX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 4:20-CR-239-1 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 1 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 03/20/2023 [23-20111] (CCR) [ENTERED: 03/23/2023 12:29 PM]

(#4) JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE ON 04/07/2023 FOR APPELLANT JOSEPH RAYMOND WEEKS [23-20111] (CCR) [ENTERED: 03/23/2023 12:27 PM]

(#6) ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (VLP) [ENTERED: 06/21/2023 07:29 AM]

(#5) ORDER FILED: WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. NO MANDATE TO ISSUE, DECISION NOT FOR PUBLICATION. ALAN E. NORRIS, CIRCUIT JUDGE; EUGENE E. SILER, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE AND ERIC E. MURPHY, CIRCUIT JUDGE. (VLP) [ENTERED: 06/21/2023 07:25 AM]

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: PURSUANT TO THE 11TH CIR.R.42-1(B), THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BECAUSE THE APPELLANT MARC AARON GASIEWICZ FAILED TO PAY THE FILING AND DOCKETING FEES TO THE DISTRICT COURT, OR FILE A CONSENT FORM WITHIN THE TIME FIXED BY THE RULES. [ENTERED: 02/04/2020 12:59 PM]

NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY TO MARC AARON GASIEWICZ. YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED THE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-1 THROUGH 26.1-4 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE OR APPEAL UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), RETURN OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT ACTION, OR OTHER SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL, THE PARTY, OR BOTH. [ENTERED: 01/09/2020 02:44 PM]

(#3) ORDER FILED: IT IS ORDERED THAT THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED (LACK OF JURISDICTION). JOHN M. ROGERS, CIRCUIT JUDGE; JOHN B. NALBANDIAN, CIRCUIT JUDGE AND ERIC E. MURPHY, CIRCUIT JUDGE. (MTW) [ENTERED: 07/17/2020 02:15 PM]

(#2) THE CASE MANAGER FOR THIS CASE IS: BRISTON MITCHELL (BSM) [ENTERED: 06/23/2020 11:08 AM]

[11041075] NOTIFICATION OF DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN DISTRICT COURT. APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY FILED (NOA - SEE FED. R. APP. P. 22(B)). [23-6176] [ENTERED: 11/01/2023 01:03 PM]

[11040836] PRISONER CASE DOCKETED. DATE RECEIVED: 10/27/2023. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND FEE OR IFP FORMS DUE 11/30/2023 FOR THOMAS ROYE WAHPEKECHE. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE DUE ON 11/14/2023 FOR LUKE PETTIGREW. [23-6176] [ENTERED: 10/31/2023 04:52 PM]

(#3) JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. MISCELLANEOUS DUE ON 07/14/2023 FOR APPELLANT CHRISTOPHER MCINTOSH (UNEQUIVOCAL LETTER) [23-20275] (ABT) [ENTERED: 06/14/2023 10:21 AM]

(#1) DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. CHRISTOPHER MCINTOSH [23-20275] (ABT) [ENTERED: 06/14/2023 10:09 AM]

(#2) FILED APPELLANT GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO MOTION TO APPOINT PRO BONO COUNSEL. DEFICIENCIES: NONE. SERVED ON 03/27/2023. [12685221] (BJK) [ENTERED: 03/29/2023 04:38 PM]

(#1) DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. THIS APPEAL IS SUBJECT TO A PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDER IN CASE NUMBER 19-80161. THE APPEAL WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT WILL BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED. NO BRIEFING SCHEDULE WILL BE SET UNTIL/UNLESS THE COURT DETERMINES THAT THE APPEAL SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PROCEED. [12659964] (RT) [ENTERED: 02/23/2023 01:44 PM]

CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL PURSUANT TO 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42 FOR FAILURE TO PAY FEE [9002652-2] [19-40113] (ABT) [ENTERED: 03/12/2019 12:44 PM]

INITIAL CASE CHECK BY ATTORNEY ADVISOR COMPLETE, ACTION: CASE OK TO PROCESS. [8985727-2] INITIAL AA CHECK DUE SATISFIED. FEE DUE ON 03/04/2019 FOR APPELLANT GILBERT LOPEZ [19-40113] (CAS) [ENTERED: 02/15/2019 04:44 PM]

(#4) FILED ORIGINAL AND 6 COPIES OF APPELLANT JOHN CHRISTOPHER BROWN OPENING BRIEF OF 20 PAGES (INFORMAL: YES). SERVED ON 08/17/2023. (MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL PENDING, BRIEFING REMAINS STAYED) [12778829] (SML) [ENTERED: 08/22/2023 01:53 PM]

(#3) FILED APPELLANT JOHN CHRISTOPHER BROWN FORM 24 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. DEFICIENCIES: NONE. SERVED ON 07/08/2023. [12753893] (RL) [ENTERED: 07/12/2023 01:59 PM]

(#5) INITIAL CASE CHECK BY ATTORNEY ADVISOR COMPLETE. ACTION: CASE OK TO PROCESS. [5] INITIAL AA CHECK DUE SATISFIED.. FEE DUE ON 11/01/2023 FOR APPELLANT RICARDO RODRIGUEZ [23-11047] (JJF) [ENTERED: 10/17/2023 08:28 AM]

(#1) PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. RICARDO RODRIGUEZ [23-11047] (JJF) [ENTERED: 10/16/2023 09:07 AM]

CLERK ORDER:IF THE ORIGINAL FILE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT, THE COURT WILL RELY ON THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE RECORD IN ITS REVIEW. THE APPENDICES REQUIRED BY EIGHTH CIRCUIT RULE 30A SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH EIGHTH CIRCUIT LOCAL RULE 30A(A)(2), THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IS REQUESTED TO FORWARD TO THIS COURT FORTHWITH ANY PORTIONS OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD WHICH ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT THROUGH PACER, INCLUDING ANY DOCUMENTS MAINTAINED IN PAPER FORMAT OR FILED UNDER SEAL, EXHIBITS, ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS AND STATE COURT FILES. THESE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 10 DAYS. [5283547] [23-2353] (CAH) [ENTERED: 06/05/2023 10:22 AM]

ORIGINATING COURT DOCUMENT FILED CONSISTING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL, DOCKET ENTRIES, ORDER 4/20/23, JUDGMENT 4/21/23. [5283553] [23-2353] (CAH) [ENTERED: 06/05/2023 10:28 AM]

(#5) FILED APPELLANT PEDRO RODRIGUEZ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COA REQUEST. DEFICIENCIES: NONE [12600599] (NAC) [ENTERED: 12/02/2022 07:27 AM]

(#4) FILED APPELLANT PEDRO RODRIGUEZ MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE. DEFICIENCIES: NONE. SERVED ON 11/19/2022.RECORDS FOR MERITS PANEL [12595543] (DJV) [ENTERED: 11/25/2022 07:16 AM]

NOTICE [1823324] TO CHANGE PARTY ADDRESS (CORRECT ON DOCKET) FILED BY MAKUSHA GOZO [SERVICE DATE: 01/09/2020 ] [19-5348] [ENTERED: 01/09/2020 11:59 AM]

RECEIPT [1821771] RECEIVED FROM MAKUSHA GOZO [SIGNED FOR ON 12/16/2019] FOR DOCUMENTS [ # 1819581-2 ] SENT TO APPELLANT MAKUSHA GOZO [19-5348] [ENTERED: 12/27/2019 01:25 PM]

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION FILED. ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 1:13-CV-00339-LO-TCB. COPIES TO ALL PARTIES AND THE DISTRICT COURT/AGENCY [999761844]. MAILED TO: MALCOLM MUHAMMAD. [15-7294]

JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE ON 04/27/2022 FOR APPELLANT ALFRED JOHN MCDONALD [22-10352] (MBC) [ENTERED: 04/12/2022 12:25 PM]

DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. ALFRED JOHN MCDONALD [22-10352] (MBC) [ENTERED: 04/12/2022 12:18 PM]

MEMO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [ # 9526467-2 ] FILED BY APPELLANT MR. DARRYL LYNN BROWN [21-50154] (CNF) [ENTERED: 04/09/2021 09:53 AM]

MOTION FILED BY APPELLANT MR. DARRYL LYNN BROWN TO APPOINT COUNSEL [9526477-2]. [21-50154] (CNF) [ENTERED: 03/16/2021 07:59 AM]

MANDATE ISSUED. [5021447] [21-1240] (JPP) [ENTERED: 04/02/2021 11:13 AM]

JUDGMENT FILED - APPELLANT HAS FAILED TO RESPOND TO THE SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND THE TIME FOR A RESPONSE HAS EXPIRED. THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. MANDATE SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH. [5021444] [21-1240] (JPP) [ENTERED: 04/02/2021 11:08 AM]

DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP PENDING FOR APPELLANT MR. ERIC DESHAUN SMITH. FEE DEADLINE SATISFIED. [20-40490] (DLM) [ENTERED: 08/27/2020 09:46 AM]

INITIAL CASE CHECK BY ATTORNEY ADVISOR COMPLETE, ACTION: CASE OK TO PROCESS. [9371620-2] INITIAL AA CHECK DUE SATISFIED.. FEE DUE ON 08/20/2020 FOR APPELLANT ERIC DESHAUN SMITH [20-40490] (JMW) [ENTERED: 08/05/2020 04:22 PM]

CLERK ORDER: THE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FILED BY APPELLANT ADAM LANE IS HEREBY ORDERED TAKEN WITH THE CASE FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE PANEL TO WHICH THIS CASE IS SUBMITTED FOR DISPOSITION ON THE MERITS. - FOR CAL [4905006] [20-1565] (CMH) [ENTERED: 04/21/2020 11:10 AM]

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, FILED BY APPELLANT ADAM LANE W/SERVICE 04/21/2020. [4905002] [20-1565] (CMH) [ENTERED: 04/21/2020 11:07 AM]

(#2) ORDER (CLERK) ON MARCH 12, 2021, THIS COURT RECEIVED THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION: 2254. UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 22(A), AN APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS MUST BE MADE TO THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT. IF MADE TO A CIRCUIT JUDGE, THE APPLICATION MUST BE TRANSFERRED TO THE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT COURT. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITION IS TRANSFERRED TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. (CJG) [ENTERED: 03/15/2021 08:45 AM]

(#1) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED BY PETITIONER SAMUEL SANTIAGO. (CJG) [ENTERED: 03/15/2021 08:42 AM]

(#3) ORDER: PURSUANT TO THE 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BECAUSE THE APPELLANT FRANK PATE FAILED TO PAY THE FILING AND DOCKETING FEES TO THE DISTRICT COURT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IN DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE TIME FIXED BY THE RULES [ENTERED: 04/19/2023 02:33 PM]

(#2) NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY TO FRANK PATE. YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED THE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-1 THROUGH 26.1-4 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE OR APPEAL UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), RETURN OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT ACTION, OR OTHER SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL, THE PARTY, OR BOTH. IF YOU ARE AN APPELLANT OR PETITIONER, UPON EXPIRATION OF 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, YOUR APPEAL WILL BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IF THE DEFAULT HAS NOT BEEN REMEDIED, PURSUANT TO 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-5(C) AND 42-1(B). IF YOU ARE AN APPELLEE OR RESPONDENT, NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED UNTIL THE CIP DEFICIENCY IS REMEDIED. SEE 11TH CIR. R. 26.1-5. [ENTERED: 04/12/2023 03:51 PM]

(#6) FILED ORDER (INTERIM APPELLATE COMMISSIONER): AFTER RECEIVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THIS COURTS APRIL 19, 2021 ORDER, ATTORNEY ROBERT BELES WAS DIRECTED TO FILE, NO LATER THAN MAY 24, 2021, EITHER A NOTICE THAT HIS OFFICE INTENDS TO REPRESENT APPELLANT ON APPEAL OR A MOTION TO WITHDRAW UNDER NINTH CIRCUIT RULE 4-1(C). THE COURT FURTHER DIRECTED MR. BELES TO SUBMIT, NO LATER THAN MAY 24, 2021, A DECLARATION STATING WHO SIGNED THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED APRIL 8, 2021, AND ON WHAT DATE. TO DATE, THE COURT HAS RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THIS ORDER, MR. BELES OR ANOTHER ATTORNEY IN HIS OFFICE MUST SUBMIT A RESPONSE TO THIS COURTS APRIL 19, 2021 AND MAY 13, 2021 ORDERS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. THE CLERK WILL SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON LUIS MONTENEGRO, CDCR AL6347, CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE TREATMENT FACILITY, P.O. BOX 5248, CORCORAN, CA 93212. (COA) [12138817] (JBS) [ENTERED: 06/09/2021 11:39 AM]

(#5) FILED CLERK ORDER (DEPUTY CLERK: KMB): ATTORNEY ROBERT BELESS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME (DOCKET ENTRY NO. [ # 4 ]) TO RESPOND TO THIS COURTS APRIL 19, 2021 ORDER IS GRANTED. BY MAY 24, 2021, MR. BELES MUST EITHER NOTIFY THIS COURT THAT HIS OFFICE INTENDS TO REPRESENT APPELLANT ON APPEAL OR FILE A MOTION TO WITHDRAW UNDER NINTH CIRCUIT RULE 4-1(C). THE COURT NOTES THE LETTER DATED APRIL 26, 2021, ADDRESSED FROM MR. BELES TO APPELLANT, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME. SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. [ # 4 ], EXHIBIT A. IN THAT LETTER, MR. BELES EXPLAINED TO APPELLANT THAT, BECAUSE MR. BELESS OFFICE HAD NOT HEARD FROM APPELLANT BY APRIL 8, 2021, THEY FILED A NOTICE OF APPEAL LISTING YOU AS IN PRO PER TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHT FOR APPEAL. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT ON APRIL 8, 2021 BEARS AN ILLEGIBLE, HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE. MR. BELESS APRIL 26, 2021 LETTER SUGGESTS THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SIGNED BY APPELLANT. SEE FED. R. APP. P. 3(C). TO CLARIFY THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE LETTER AND THE NOTICE OF APPEAL, MR. BELESS RESPONSE TO THIS COURTS APRIL 19, 2021 ORDER MUST ALSO INCLUDE A DECLARATION ATTESTING TO WHO SIGNED THE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED ON APRIL 8, 2021, AND THE DATE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS SIGNED. THE CLERK WILL SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER ON LUIS MONTENEGRO, CDCR AL6347, CALIFORNIA SUBSTANCE TREATMENT FACILITY, P.O. BOX 5248, CORCORAN, CA 93212. [12111797] (JBS) [ENTERED: 05/13/2021 10:54 AM]

CJA APPOINTMENT FOR ATTORNEY MR. SHANNON CHARLES HOOKS FOR MR. MARK BLAYKE MAYS. COUNSEL MUST USE THE EVOUCHER SYSTEM TO FILE THE VOUCHER AT DISPOSITION OF THE CASE. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: NTX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 1:22-CR-41-1 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 1 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 12/19/2022 [22-11222] (RAJ) [ENTERED: 12/21/2022 04:18 PM]

JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE ON 01/05/2023 FOR APPELLANT MARK BLAYKE MAYS [22-11222] (RAJ) [ENTERED: 12/21/2022 04:16 PM]

(#4) JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE ON 10/05/2023 FOR APPELLANT MALIK QUENDELL NEWTON [23-30658] (JJF) [ENTERED: 09/20/2023 03:42 PM]

(#3) CJA APPOINTMENT FOR ATTORNEY MR. DOUGLAS LEE HARVILLE FOR MALIK QUENDELL NEWTON. COUNSEL MUST USE THE EVOUCHER SYSTEM TO FILE THE VOUCHER AT DISPOSITION OF THE CASE. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER GUIDANCE. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: WLA ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 5:23-CR-15-1 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 1 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 09/20/2023 [23-30658] (JJF) [ENTERED: 09/20/2023 03:39 PM]

(#7) FILED LETTER FROM APPELLANT PRAVEEN KHARB REGARDING APPEAL. [7] [7262959] [22-2345] (MAN) [ENTERED: 09/26/2022 02:34 PM]

(#6) FILED DISTRICT COURT ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT PRAVEEN KHARB LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. DATE IFP GRANTED: 08/16/2022. [6] [7254846] [22-2345] (CG) [ENTERED: 08/16/2022 11:31 AM]

(#4) STREAMLINED REQUEST BY APPELLANT ROBERT HACKWORTH, JR. TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE THE BRIEF IS NOT APPROVED BECAUSE IT IS UNNECESSARY. THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS STAYED. SEE 9TH CIR. R. 27-11. [11400275] (BG) [ENTERED: 08/16/2019 01:51 PM]

(#3) FILED APPELLANT ROBERT HACKWORTH, JR. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. DEFICIENCIES: NONE. SERVED ON. [11363563] (JFF) [ENTERED: 07/15/2019 01:51 PM]

[10831954] NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS FILED BY ISMAEL RUIZ. [21-8014] [ENTERED: 05/24/2021 12:04 PM]

[10830623] NOTICE ISSUED BY THE COURT- APPELLANT IS REQUIRED TO EITHER PAY THE FILING FEE FOR THIS APPEAL OR FILE FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 USC 1915. FEE OR 1915 FORMS DUE BY 06/28/2021 FOR ISMAEL RUIZ [21-8014] [ENTERED: 05/17/2021 04:08 PM]

JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE ON 10/17/2022 FOR APPELLANT JOEL MILES [22-10932] (RSM) [ENTERED: 09/30/2022 12:38 PM]

DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. JOEL MILES [22-10932] (RSM) [ENTERED: 09/30/2022 12:08 PM]

(#4) JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. TRANSCRIPT ORDER DUE ON 05/22/2023 FOR APPELLANT ROBERT CHARLES JOHN. [23-30301] (SEP) [ENTERED: 05/05/2023 11:26 AM]

(#1) DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. ROBERT CHARLES JOHN. [23-30301] (SEP) [ENTERED: 05/05/2023 11:23 AM]

(#9) DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON THE ELECTION OF OPTIONS FORM RECEIVED FROM APPELLANT MR. ALEX ADAMS, MARKING N/A FOR THE FILING FEE, BECAUSE THERE WILL BE A FILING FEE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO PROCEED WITH THE APPEAL. [23-20177] (DLM) [ENTERED: 05/16/2023 02:32 PM]

(#8) DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON THE MOTION FOR COA AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT RECEIVED FROM APPELLANT MR. ALEX ADAMS BECAUSE A COA IS NOT REQUIRED IN THIS TYPE OF APPEAL. [23-20177] (DLM) [ENTERED: 04/27/2023 07:56 AM]

(#5) FILED APPELLANT DEPARRIS PRATT MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLRA MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. [5] [7073382] [20-1390] (CAH) [ENTERED: 04/07/2020 03:04 PM]

(#4) PROSE MOTION FILED BY APPELLANT DEPARRIS PRATT TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. [4] [7073381] [20-1390] (CAH) [ENTERED: 04/07/2020 03:04 PM]

(#4) RULE 45 NOTICE ISSUED TO ROBERT GRAHAM, JR. RE: FOR FAILURE TO SATISFY PLRA AND INFORMAL BRIEFING REQUIREMENTS. CASE WILL BE DISMISSED IF DEFAULT IS NOT CURED WITHIN 15 DAYS. INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF DUE 04/09/2021. PLRA DOCUMENTS DUE 04/09/2021.. [21-6261] RHS [ENTERED: 03/25/2021 03:49 PM]

(#3) INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER FILED.. INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF DUE 03/18/2021 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF, IF ANY: 14 DAYS AFTER INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF SERVED. [21-6261] RHS [ENTERED: 02/22/2021 03:43 PM]

[10639520] ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED BY AZLEN ADIEU FARQUOIT MARCHET. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: N. SERVED ON 04/02/2019. MANNER OF SERVICE: US MAIL [19-4045] [ENTERED: 04/08/2019 12:26 PM]

[10638129] ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED BY MARK FIELD FOR LARRY BENZON. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: N. SERVED ON 04/02/2019. MANNER OF SERVICE: US MAIL [19-4045] [ENTERED: 04/03/2019 06:46 AM]

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FILED BY. ON THE SAME DAY THE CIP IS SERVED, ANY FILER REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL MUST ALSO COMPLETE THE COURT'S WEB-BASED STOCK TICKER SYMBOL CERTIFICATE AT THE LINK HERE HTTP://WWW.CA11.USCOURTS.GOV/WEB-BASED-CIP OR ON THE COURT'S WEBSITE. SEE 11TH CIR. R. 26.1-1(B). [22-12780] (ECF: BRIAN WAHL) [ENTERED: 10/13/2022 12:18 PM]

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FORM FILED BY MICHAEL J. BENTLEY, APPELLEES, GONZALO ESPINO AND SINGLETARY [22-12780] (ECF: MICHAEL BENTLEY) [ENTERED: 10/13/2022 11:22 AM]

(#10) ORDER (CLERK) NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY APPELLANT COURTLAND D. ROMEO. IT IS NOTED THAT THE DISTRICT COURT PREVIOUSLY GRANTED APPELLANT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. (KR) [ENTERED: 08/08/2023 03:26 PM]

(#9) ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FROM BRIAN L. ARBAN ON BEHALF OF APPELLEE(S) ROBERT MAY, WARDEN JAMES T. VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. [23-2373] (BLA) [ENTERED: 08/07/2023 03:14 PM]

(#11) ISSUED CIRCUIT RULE 3(B) 14 DAY NOTICE TO FILE A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY THE DOCKETING FEE IN THE DISTRICT COURT. FEE OR IFP FORMS DUE ON 07/20/2022 FOR APPELLANT MICHAEL D. MORTON. [11] [7246381] [22-1837] (AD) [ENTERED: 07/06/2022 03:02 PM]

(#10) ORDER RE: RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF PETITIONER AND MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE NEW CUSTODIAN. THE MOTION IS GRANTED. THE CLERK WILL UPDATE THE COURTS DOCKET TO REFLECT THE APPELLANTS NEW ADDRESS. THE CLERK WILL FURTHER UPDATE THE DOCKET TO REFLECT THAT THE APPELLANTS CUSTODIAN AND THE APPELLEE IN THIS MATTER IS NOW WARDEN BRADLEY M. TRATE. [ # 9 ] SCR [10] [7245726] [22-1837] (CG) [ENTERED: 07/01/2022 02:05 PM]

(#11) ORDER (CLERK) THE FOREGOING ARE HEREBY CONSIDERED. ACTION ON THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WILL CONTINUE TO BE DEFERRED. AS PREVIOUSLY ADVISED, APPELLANT HAS HAD THREE PREVIOUS CASES DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS AND MAY NOT PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNLESS HE IS IN IMMINENT DANGER. THE CASES ARE: CARROLL V. WRIGHT, E.D. PA. NO. 5-19-CV-00238; CARROLL V. MALLON, E.D. PA. NO. 2-22-CV-00848; AND CARROLL V. WILLIAMS, E.D. PA. NO. 2-22-CV-02690. THEREFORE, APPELLANT MUST SUBMIT, WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, A MOTION DEMONSTRATING IMMINENT DANGER OF A SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY. FAILURE TO SUBMIT THIS MOTION WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPEAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. ONCE FILED, THE MOTION DEMONSTRATING IMMINENT DANGER WILL BE FORWARDED TO A PANEL OF THIS COURT ALONG WITH THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND THE TWO RESPONSES TO THE SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 CLERK'S ORDER. IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT APPELLANT MAY PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, THE COURT WILL THEN PROCEED TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE APPEAL WILL BE DISMISSED AS LEGALLY FRIVOLOUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION: 1915(E)(2) OR WHETHER SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE UNDER THIRD CIRCUIT L.A.R. 27.4 AND I.O.P. 10.6 IS APPROPRIATE. IN MAKING THIS DETERMINATION, THE DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND RECORD WILL BE EXAMINED. NO BRIEFING SCHEDULE WILL ISSUE UNTIL THIS DETERMINATION IS MADE. APPELLANT MAY SUBMIT ARGUMENT, NOT TO EXCEED 5 PAGES, IN SUPPORT OF THE APPEAL. THE DOCUMENT, WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, MUST BE FILED WITH THE CLERK WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. APPELLEE NEED NOT FILE A RESPONSE UNLESS DIRECTED TO DO SO. (DW) [ENTERED: 11/01/2022 03:15 PM]

(#10) MOTION FILED BY APPELLANT ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR. TO GRANT MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SECOND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE CLERK'S ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 2022. RESPONSE DUE ON 11/03/2022. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE DATED 10/21/2022. SERVICE MADE BY US MAIL. (DW) [ENTERED: 10/28/2022 03:16 PM]

(#2) FILED APPELLANT BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL MOTION TO STAY APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS. DEFICIENCIES: NONE. SERVED ON 05/15/2019. [11303524] (QDL) [ENTERED: 05/20/2019 04:26 PM]

(#1) OPEN 9TH CIRCUIT DOCKET: NEEDS CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. DATE COA DENIED IN DC: 03/04/2019. RECORD ON APPEAL INCLUDED: YES. [11285051] (JMR) [ENTERED: 05/02/2019 02:40 PM]

DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AT THIS TIME ON THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (IFP) AND FOR MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (COA) RECEIVED FROM APPELLANT MR. SHAWN MAYREIS. THE APPEAL IS PROCEEDING IFP ALREADY IN LIGHT OF THE DISTRICT COURT'S ORDER OF 2/18/19 THAT GRANTING IFP, AND A MOTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF COA HAVE ALREADY BEEN FILED. [19-20069] (DLM) [ENTERED: 03/19/2019 02:35 PM]

EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [ # 9005772-2 ] FILED BY APPELLANT MR. SHAWN MAYREIS [19-20069] (MRW) [ENTERED: 03/15/2019 08:46 AM]

(#6) ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM FILED BY APPELLANT KENNETH BRYAN RITCHEYFOR THE COURT TO PROCESS. DATE OF SERVICE: 08/31/2023 VIA EMAIL - ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: BUCKNER; ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: GILBERT. [23-60468] (JASON SCOTT GILBERT ) [ENTERED: 08/31/2023 04:56 PM]

(#5) APPEARANCE FORM RECEIVED FROM MR. JASON SCOTT GILBERT FOR KENNETH BRYAN RITCHEY FOR THE COURT'S REVIEW. LEAD COUNSEL? YES. [23-60468] (JASON SCOTT GILBERT ) [ENTERED: 08/31/2023 04:55 PM]

JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [22-11199] (MBC) [ENTERED: 12/15/2022 11:04 AM]

DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. NOA FILED BY APPELLANT MR. BRANDON KEITH WRIGHT [22-11199] (MBC) [ENTERED: 12/15/2022 10:58 AM]

CORRECTED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FILED BY APPELLANT GADIEL ROMERO. SERVED ON 12/20/2021. [21-1904] (TAM) [ENTERED: 12/20/2021 01:55 PM]

ORDER ADVISING PETITIONER THE REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THIS COURT FOR A DECISION. DATE OF DENIAL BY DISTRICT COURT: SEPTEMBER 22, 2021. [21-1904] (GAK) [ENTERED: 12/20/2021 09:58 AM]

(#5) JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-20277] (DLM) [ENTERED: 06/14/2023 02:14 PM]

(#4) EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO FILE SUCCESSIVE PETITION [ # 2 ] FILED BY MOVANT MR. NKRUMAH LUMUMBA VALIER [23-20277] (DLM) [ENTERED: 06/14/2023 02:14 PM]

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION FILED BY PETITIONER FRANKLIN E. PETERS. [21-1750] (GRC) [ENTERED: 09/22/2021 11:19 AM]

(#8) CLERK LETTER SENT DIRECTING APPELLANT TO PAY THE FILING FEE OF THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $505.00 DIRECTLY TO THE DISTRICT COURT OR FILE A MOTION OR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER. (DW) [ENTERED: 02/15/2022 02:26 PM]

(#7) LETTER FROM APPELLANT MR. CAREY ABNEY REGARDING COSTS FOR FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL. SERVICE MADE ON 02/15/2022 BY ECF. (DW) [ENTERED: 02/15/2022 02:19 PM]

NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY TO DAVID RODRIGUEZ. YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED THE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-1 THROUGH 26.1-4 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE OR APPEAL UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), RETURN OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT ACTION, OR OTHER SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL, THE PARTY, OR BOTH. [ENTERED: 10/06/2020 01:56 PM]

NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY TO DAVID RODRIGUEZ. YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED THE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-1 THROUGH 26.1-4 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE OR APPEAL UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), RETURN OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT ACTION, OR OTHER SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL, THE PARTY, OR BOTH. [ENTERED: 09/21/2020 12:59 PM]

APPEARANCE FORM FILED BY ATTORNEY JENNIFER WISSINGER FOR APPELLEE BOBBY LUMPKIN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION IN 20-40625 [20-40625] (JMW) [ENTERED: 11/13/2020 02:22 PM]

APPEARANCE FORM RECEIVED FROM MS. JENNIFER WISSINGER FOR MR. BOBBY LUMPKIN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION FOR THE COURT'S REVIEW. LEAD COUNSEL? YES. [20-40625] (JENNIFER WISSINGER ) [ENTERED: 11/12/2020 11:25 AM]

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: PURSUANT TO THE 11TH CIR.R.42-1(B), THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BECAUSE THE APPELLANT LEVI ARTHUR FEDD HAS FAILED TO PAY THE FILING AND DOCKETING FEES TO THE DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE TIME FIXED BY THE RULES. [ENTERED: 02/26/2019 10:04 AM]

NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY TO LEVI ARTHUR FEDD. YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED THE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-1 THROUGH 26.1-4 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE OR APPEAL UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), RETURN OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT ACTION, OR OTHER SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL, THE PARTY, OR BOTH. [ENTERED: 02/20/2019 10:08 AM]

(#4) ORDER: PURSUANT TO THE 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BECAUSE THE APPELLANT WASEEM DAKER FAILED TO PAY THE FILING AND DOCKETING FEES (OR FILE A MOTION IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR RELIEF FROM THE OBLIGATION TO PAY IN ADVANCE THE FULL FEE) TO THE DISTRICT COURT AND FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES ON CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS WITHIN THE TIME FIXED BY THE RULES. [ENTERED: 04/18/2023 03:49 PM]

(#2) NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY TO WASEEM DAKER. YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT COMPLETED THE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP). FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-1 THROUGH 26.1-4 MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE OR APPEAL UNDER 11TH CIR. R. 42-1(B), RETURN OF DEFICIENT DOCUMENTS WITHOUT ACTION, OR OTHER SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL, THE PARTY, OR BOTH. IF YOU ARE AN APPELLANT OR PETITIONER, UPON EXPIRATION OF 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, YOUR APPEAL WILL BE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IF THE DEFAULT HAS NOT BEEN REMEDIED, PURSUANT TO 11TH CIR. RULES 26.1-5(C) AND 42-1(B). IF YOU ARE AN APPELLEE OR RESPONDENT, NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED UNTIL THE CIP DEFICIENCY IS REMEDIED. SEE 11TH CIR. R. 26.1-5. [ENTERED: 03/30/2023 10:39 AM]

(#7) ORDER FILED GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED PLRA [6] FEE AMOUNT: $505.00. NAME AND PRISONER NUMBER: REGINALD L. WILSON, #0639675. COPIES TO ALL PARTIES. MAILED TO: WILSON; NYESHEA WILLIE, DIVISION OF PRISONS, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SECTION, 831 W. MORGAN STREET, 4265 MSC, RALEIGH, NC 27699-4265. [1001022593] [21-7222] TF [ENTERED: 09/14/2021 10:47 AM]

(#6) PLRA-APPLICATION (COURT ACCESS ONLY) BY REGINALD L. WILSON. CONSENT TO PAYMENT FORM: YES; TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT: YES. [21-7222] TF [ENTERED: 09/14/2021 10:43 AM]