Search online court records for free in First Appellate District - Division 5 Court by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, and more. Filter cases further by date of filing, case type, party type, party representation, and more.
With UniCourt, you can access cases online in First Appellate District - Division 5, view case summary, check case status, download court documents, as well as track cases and get alerts on new case updates and access California Courts of Appeal - First Appellate District - Division 5 cases with Enterprise APIs. UniCourt also allows you to lookup court cases and find latest docket information for all courthouses in California Courts of Appeal, California.
HEARING
10/26/2023
DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/26/2023
DESCRIPTION: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - COURT REPORTER OR ATTY.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
09/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: OTHER INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANTS GHC OF SAN FRAN 180, ET AL HAVING FILED A STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2023, THIS APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. AS STATED IN THE STIPULATION, THE PARTIES SHALL BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS ON APPEAL. THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IS DIRECTED TO CONCURRENTLY FILE THIS ORDER AND ISSUE THE REMITTITUR.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/09/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:
[-] Read LessDOCKET
10/02/2023
DESCRIPTION: RETURNED DOCUMENT FOR NON-CONFORMANCE.; NOTES: APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; THE COURT HAS DEEMED THIS MATTER AS FULLY BRIEFED. YOU WILL NEED TO FILE A MOTION OR REQUEST REGARDING THE FILING OF YOUR REPLY BRIEF. ANY EXHIBITS SUPPORTING YOUR MOTION OR REQUEST MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE MOVING DOCUMENT AND COMPLY WITH CRC 8.74.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/14/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL FILED IN TRIAL COURT ON:; NOTES: 06/26/2023. DESIGNATING 8.124 WITH RT.
[-] Read LessHEARING
08/10/2023
DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
12/26/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FILED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL FILED. DUE ON 12/26/2023 BY 47 DAY(S) BY THE COURT: ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2023, APPELLANT FILED A "NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF APPEAL& AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DISMISSAL." THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED IN PART. THE CURRENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE IS VACATED. APPELLANT MUST FILE THE DISMISSAL REQUEST NO LATER THAN 90 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO FILE THE DISMISSAL REQUEST BY THAT TIME WILL CAUSE THE COURT TO DISMISS THE APPEAL (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.244(A)(4).)
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/17/2023
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/13/2023
DESCRIPTION: FILED:; NOTES: CORRECTED ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING; SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER CORRECTED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
11/13/2023
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/29/2023
DESCRIPTION: MOD. OF OPINION FILED (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT).; NOTES: THE OPINION FILED SEPT. 13, 2023, IS MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: THE SECOND SENTENCE OF SECTION C. ON PAGE 11 SHALL BE REPLACED WITH THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE: THIS COURT CONSOLIDATED THE TWO APPEALS AND GRANTED MITCHELL'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CALENDAR PREFERENCE. THIS ORDER DOES NOT EFFECT A CHANGE IN THE JUDGMENT. DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT STEVIE MITCHELL'S APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF ERROR IN COURT'S OPINION IS GRANTED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/19/2023
DESCRIPTION: EMAIL SENT TO:; NOTES: COUNSEL RE REMOTE AND/OR IN-PERSON ORAL ARGUMENT INSTRUCTIONS
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/19/2023
DESCRIPTION: CALENDAR NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY. CALENDAR DATE:; NOTES: OCTOBER 17, 2023 AT 9:00 A.M.
[-] Read LessHEARING
11/17/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FILED TO:; NOTES: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED. DUE ON 11/17/2023 BY 60 DAY(S)
[-] Read LessHEARING
09/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/23/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: STEPHEN WONG ATTORNEY: BORIS BINDMAN
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/02/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/21/2023
DESCRIPTION: MOTION/APPLICATION TO AUGMENT RECORD FILED.; NOTES: FROM ATTORNEY DIRCK NEWBURY FOR APPELLANT 1. RT - 1/11, 2023, 1/12/2023, 1/17/2023, 1/18/2023, 1/19, 2023 30-DAY EOT REQUESTED
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY PATRICK BURNS FOR RESPONDENT; IN-PERSON APPEARANCE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/08/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY WALLACE DOOLITTLE FOR APPELLANT; REMOTE APPEARANCE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/12/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FILED TO:; NOTES: REQUEST TO PROCEED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT FROM ATTORNEY ORY SANDEL FOR RESPONDENT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/05/2023
DESCRIPTION: ISSUED TENTATIVE OPINION OR DISPUTED ISSUED MEMO; NOTES: BY THE COURT: THIS CASE IS CURRENTLY SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2023, AT 9:00 A.M. TO ASSIST THE PARTIES, A TENTATIVE OPINION IS ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER. IF A PARTY THAT PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED ARGUMENT NOTIFIES THE COURT, OPPOSING COUNSEL, AND ANY UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN WRITING BY SEPTEMBER 18 THAT THEY STILL WISH TO PROCEED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT, ORAL ARGUMENT WILL TAKE PLACE AS SCHEDULED AND THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THE TENTATIVE OPINION WILL BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. EACH SIDE WILL BE PERMITTED 10 MINUTES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.256(C).) IF NO SUCH NOTIFICATION IS GIVEN, ORAL ARGUMENT WILL NOT BE HELD, AND THE COURT'S FINAL OPINION WILL REFLECT THE SUBSTANCE OF THE TENTATIVE OPINION. [FULL TENTATIVE AVAILABLE ON .PDF]
[-] Read LessHEARING
09/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
09/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - COURT REPORTER OR ATTY.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - COURT REPORTER OR ATTY.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/16/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY BOBBIE STEIN FOR APPELLANT; IN-PERSON APPEARANCE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/14/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: DAG MARC KOHM FOR RESPONDENT; OPTION C CHECKED - REMOTE APPEARANCE IF ORAL ARGUMENT IS CALENDARED
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/30/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/04/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPEAL DISMISSED PER RULE 8.100(C).
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/16/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/05/2023
DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO COUNSEL RE:; NOTES: RECORD FILED TODAY. AOB DUE 40 DAYS.
[-] Read LessHEARING
01/02/2024
DESCRIPTION: BANKRUPTCY UPDATE DUE OR DISMISS AS ABA.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: ORDER FILED.; NOTES: ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2023, APPELLANT KELHAM VINEYARDS & WINERY NOTIFIED THIS COURT THAT A CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY CASE HAD BEEN FILED IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT. IN LIGHT OF THIS FILING, THIS APPEAL, WHICH WAS FILED ON MAY 23, 2023, IS HEREBY STAYED PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. SECTION 362. PURSUANT TO FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 12(C), RESPONDENT SHALL SERVE AND FILE A REPORT ON THE FIRST COURT DAY OF JANUARY, APRIL, JULY AND OCTOBER TO APPRISE THE COURT OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS. THE NEXT SUCH REPORT IS DUE ON JANUARY 2, 2024.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/09/2023
DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/26/2023
DESCRIPTION: RULING ON REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE DEFERRED.; NOTES: APPELLANT ALAMEDA COUNTY TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION FILED A REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ON SEPTEMBER 7, 2023. NO OPPOSITION HAS BEEN FILED. THE COURT DEFERS RULING ON THIS REQUEST UNTIL THE COURT'S DECISION ON THE MERITS. (SEE PEOPLE V. PRESLIE (1977) 70 CAL.APP.3D 486, 493-494 ["[B]ECAUSE THE PROPRIETY OF TAKING JUDICIAL NOTICE USUALLY REQUIRES AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES INVOLVED, THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT JUDICIAL NOTICE WILL IN FACT BE TAKEN WILL NORMALLY BE POSTPONED AND MADE AT THE TIME THE CAUSE IS CONSIDERED ON THE MERITS"]; SEE ALSO FIRST DISTRICT LOCAL RULES, RULE 9(B).)
[-] Read LessHEARING
11/15/2023
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
09/15/2023
DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE ORDER SUSTAINING THE DEMURRER WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IS AFFIRMED. DEFENDANTS ARE ENTITLED TO COSTS ON APPEAL. (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.278(A)(2).); PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: JACKSON, TERI L.; PARTICIPANTS: SIMONS, MARK B. (CONCUR) BURNS, GORDON B. (CONCUR)
[-] Read LessHEARING
12/08/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/19/2023
DESCRIPTION: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FILED TO:; NOTES: APPELLANT'S APPENDIX AND OPENING BRIEF FILED. DUE ON 12/08/2023 BY 60 DAY(S)
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF. DUE ON 10/18/2023 BY 30 DAY(S)
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - COURT REPORTER OR ATTY.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/05/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPEAL DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/20/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT NOTIFIED RE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: SAN FRANCISCO EAGLE BAR LLC ATTORNEY: GEOFFREY MARTIN MURRY DEADLINE WAS 09/18/2023
[-] Read LessHEARING
12/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/27/2023
DESCRIPTION: RECORD TRANSMITTED TO SUPREME COURT ELECTRONICALLY.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/20/2023
DESCRIPTION: FILED LETTER FROM:; NOTES: DAG VICTORIA RATNIKOVA FOR RESPONDENT DATED SEP. 20, 2023; RESPONDENT STILL WISHES TO PROCEED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/19/2023
DESCRIPTION: ISSUED TENTATIVE OPINION OR DISPUTED ISSUED MEMO; NOTES: BY THE COURT: THIS CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON THE COURT'S SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 CALENDAR AT 11:00 A.M. ON ITS OWN MOTION, THE COURT HAS DECIDED TO DISTRIBUTE AN ABBREVIATED TENTATIVE OPINION (SEE ATTACHED) TO THE PARTIES BEFORE ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, RULE 15, SUBDIVISION (B). IF A PARTY THAT PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED ARGUMENT NOTIFIES THE COURT, OPPOSING COUNSEL, AND ANY UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN WRITING BY THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2023, THAT THEY STILL WISH TO PROCEED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT, ORAL ARGUMENT WILL TAKE PLACE AS SCHEDULED AND THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THE TENTATIVE OPINION WILL BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. EACH SIDE WILL BE ALLOCATED 10 MINUTES FOR ARGUMENT. (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.256(C).) IF NO SUCH NOTIFICATION IS GIVEN, ORAL ARGUMENT WILL NOT BE HELD, AND THE COURT'S FINAL OPINION WILL REFLECT THE SUBSTANCE OF THE TENTATIVE OPINION. [FULL TENTATIVE AVAILABLE ON .PDF]
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/03/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/13/2023
DESCRIPTION: FILED DOCUMENT ENTITLED:; NOTES: RESPONDENT EDEN HOUSING'S JOINDER WITH FILING FEE
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/20/2023
DESCRIPTION: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FILED TO:; NOTES: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF. DUE ON 10/25/2023 BY 30 DAY(S)
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/06/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPEAL DISMISSED - CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT NOT FILED.; NOTES: DEADLINE RE-SET TO 15 DAYS AFTER NOTICE SENT TO CORRECTED ADDRESS
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/27/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARG - DENIED.; NOTES: BY THE COURT: THE PARTIES' SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARGUMENT IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILING A RENEWED REQUEST BEFORE 10:00 A.M. ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2023.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO CONTINUE ORAL ARG - TO COURT.; NOTES: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ORAL ARGUMENT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/05/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE FULLY BRIEFED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/05/2023
DESCRIPTION: WENDE CASE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/28/2023
DESCRIPTION: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN SUPREME COURT.; NOTES: PETITION FOR REVIEW & APPLICATION FOR STAY DENIED
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: SERVICE COPY OF PETITION FOR REVIEW RECEIVED.; NOTES: FILED IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT BY STEPHEN TEMKO, ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER AKRIDGE; INCLUDES STAY REQUEST
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/16/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPEAL DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/29/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT NOTIFIED RE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: SF MARKETS, LLC ATTORNEY: AMY SHARYL WILLIAMS DEADLINE WAS 09/27/2023
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/21/2023
DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; NOTES: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: LARA GABATO ATTORNEY: DOUGLAS A. APPLEGATE
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/20/2023
DESCRIPTION: REPLY FILED TO:; NOTES: DEADLINE FOR PETITIONER TO FILE REPLY
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/27/2023
DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: REPLY FILED TO:. DUE ON 10/20/2023 BY 21 DAY(S) NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME ARE CONTEMPLATED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/21/2023
DESCRIPTION: REPLY FILED TO:; NOTES: PETITIONER'S REPLY
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/11/2023
DESCRIPTION: EXHIBITS LODGED.; NOTES: EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE TO PETITION, FROM RESPONDENT SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/26/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/26/2023
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
08/31/2023
DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL IS GRANTED. THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AND THE REMITTITUR SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH. EACH PARTY SHALL BEAR ITS OWN COSTS ON APPEAL.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/31/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/21/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY STEVEN KUHN FOR APPELLANT; IN-PERSON APPEARANCE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/21/2023
DESCRIPTION: FILED DOCUMENT ENTITLED:; NOTES: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMMENT FORM FROM ATTORNEY MATTHEW MRAULE FOR RESPONDENT; OPTION A CHECKED - RESPONDENT WAIVES ORAL ARGUMENT
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/06/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/29/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY MARGARET STEVENS FOR RESPONDENT; REMOTE APPEARANCE
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/25/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/09/2023
DESCRIPTION: REPLACE APPOINTED COUNSEL. (RE: DFC NOTICE)
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/08/2023
DESCRIPTION: DEFAULT SENT TO COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: ERIC GORDON HOLT ATTORNEY: CHRISTOPHER STANSELL DEADLINE WAS 09/05/2023
[-] Read LessDOCKET
01/17/2017
DESCRIPTION: RECORD DESTROYED PURSUANT TO RULE 10.1028(C).
[-] Read LessDOCKET
01/15/2004
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L174
[-] Read LessHEARING
08/02/2023
DESCRIPTION: SOMETHING IS DUE; SEE NOTE.; NOTES: UPDATE FROM SONOMA SUPERIOR COURT RE PENDING AUGMENT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/18/2023
DESCRIPTION: EMAIL RECEIVED FROM:; NOTES: SONOMA SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS CLERK; WORKING ON MISSING RTS
[-] Read LessDOCKET
01/30/2008
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L253
[-] Read LessDOCKET
12/22/2005
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessHEARING
06/10/2020
DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.
[-] Read LessHEARING
06/10/2020
DESCRIPTION: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - COURT REPORTER OR ATTY.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/14/2011
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: 315-05 MOST LIKELY SHIPPED 5/24/11
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
01/13/2011
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT:* THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE IS DENIED. THE PETITION FAILS TO ARTICULATE COMPELLING CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANTING REVIEW OF THE CHALLENGED ORDER BY EXTRAORDINARY WRIT, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES PRESENTED IN THE PETITION AND ACCOMPANYING RECORD. (SEE BABB V. SUPERIOR COURT (1971) 3 CAL.3D 841, 851; JAMES W. V. SUPERIOR COURT (1993) 17 CAL.APP.4TH 246, 252; OMAHA INDEMNITY CO. V. SUPERIOR COURT (1989) 209 CAL.APP.3D 1266, 1273.) * BEFORE SIMONS, ACTING P.J., NEEDHAM, J., AND BRUINIERS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
11/08/2018
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L374
[-] Read LessDOCKET
01/26/2017
DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: DREYER BABICH, ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER Z.H.: THE COURT HAS RECEIVED YOUR REQUEST TO PUBLISH IN THIS CASE. THE PETITION HAD BEEN DISMISSED ON JANUARY 17, BEFORE RECEIPT OF YOUR REQUEST. THEREFORE, THE COURT CANNOT TAKE ANY ACTION ON THE REQUEST TO PUBLISH. (SEE CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.490(B)(1)(B).)
[-] Read LessDOCKET
10/15/2007
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L260
[-] Read LessDOCKET
04/03/2006
DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: SENT REFUND CHECK #885832 TO ONE LEGAL THIS DATE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/07/2020
DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: NO ANSWERS FILED TO AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF; DEADLINE WAS 6/18/20
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/06/2020
DESCRIPTION: REPLY FILED TO:; NOTES: CONSOLIDATED REPLY TO RETURNS, FROM MICHAEL BURT AND JOHN PHILIPSBORN, ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIOINER ALFARO
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
09/19/2023
DESCRIPTION: PETITION DENIED OR DISMISSED AFTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OR PALMA ISSUED.; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: THE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF A LETTER FROM PETITIONER, DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 2023, CONFIRMING THAT THE SUPERIOR COURT TOOK THE ACTIONS OUTLINED IN THIS COURT'S AUGUST 30, 2023 ORDER AND SUGGESTIVE PALMA NOTICE. (PALMA V. U.S. INDUSTRIAL FASTENERS, INC. (1984) 36 CAL.3D 171, 177-180; BROWN, WINFIELD & CANZONERI, INC. V. SUPERIOR COURT (2010) 47 CAL.4TH 1233.) ACCORDINGLY, THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE IS DISMISSED AS MOOT, THE STAY IS DISSOLVED, AND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE PREVIOUSLY ORDERED BY THIS COURT IS VACATED. * BEFORE JACKSON, P.J., SIMONS, J., AND BURNS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/19/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
06/25/2014
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L344
[-] Read LessDOCKET
05/01/2013
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/23/2018
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L368
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
12/13/2016
DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: APPELLANT HAVING FILED A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL IN THIS COURT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. THE REMITTITUR SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH. EACH PARTY SHALL BEAR ITS OWN COSTS ON APPEAL.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
05/19/2021
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: THE CITY OF RICHMOND'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW IS DENIED. RESPONDENT MICHAEL TISCARENO'S REQUEST FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEY FEE AWARD IS DENIED. THIS ORDER IS FINAL AS TO THIS COURT ON THE DATE IT IS FILED.; AUTHOR: RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR A.; PARTICIPANTS: SIMONS, MARK B. NEEDHAM, JR., HENRY E.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
05/19/2021
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
05/20/2021
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT:* THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO BEING REFILED WITH AN ADEQUATE RECORD OF PETITIONER'S PLEA AND SENTENCING PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CHANGE OF PLEA FORM, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPTS, FILINGS, MINUTE ORDERS, AND THE ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT. (PEOPLE V. DUVALL (1995) 9 CAL.4TH 464, 474 [HABEAS PETITION SHOULD INCLUDE COPIES OF REASONABLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE].) * BEFORE NEEDHAM, ACTING P.J. AND BURNS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
05/20/2021
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
03/23/2023
DESCRIPTION: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL APPELLANTS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL HAVING FILED A REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL ON MARCH 22, 2023, THIS APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IS DIRECTED TO CONCURRENTLY FILE THIS ORDER AND ISSUE THE REMITTITUR.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
03/23/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
02/04/2022
DESCRIPTION: ORDER DISMISSING PETITION; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT:* THE COURT IS IN RECEIPT OF PETITIONER'S COUNSEL'S FEBRUARY 4, 2022 LETTER, INFORMING THE COURT THAT THE PETITION IS NOW MOOT GIVEN PETITIONER'S RESENTENCING. CONSEQUENTLY, THE PETITION IS DISMISSED. THE COURT COMMENDS THE PARTIES AND THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR EXPEDITIOUSLY RESOLVING THE UNDERLYING ISSUES. * BEFORE JACKSON, P.J., NEEDHAM, J., AND BURNS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/04/2022
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/12/2023
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/12/2023
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/02/2023
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: ENTIRE FILE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
04/07/2022
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT:* THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE FILING OF A NEW PETITION IN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.385(C)(1)(A) & (C)(2).) IN THE EVENT PETITIONER WISHES TO SEEK FURTHER HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOLLOWING EXHAUSTION OF HIS SUPERIOR COURT HABEAS REMEDY, ANY SUCH RELIEF SHOULD BE SOUGHT IN THE FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO. * BEFORE JACKSON, P.J. AND BURNS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
11/08/2018
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L374
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
12/07/2015
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT:* THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND ACCOMPANYING STAY REQUEST ARE DENIED. * BEFORE JONES, P.J., SIMONS, J. AND BRUINIERS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
05/30/2008
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L277
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/13/2007
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L262
[-] Read LessHEARING
06/10/2020
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
03/10/2020
DESCRIPTION: DISMISSED PER RULE 8.140(B); DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: APPELLANT HAVING FAILED TO PROCURE THE RECORD ON APPEAL WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED OR WITHIN ANY VALID EXTENSIONS OF TIME, AND HAVING FAILED TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR RELIEF FROM DEFAULT, THE APPEAL FILED DECEMBER 2, 2019, IS DISMISSED. (SEE CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.140(B)(1).)
[-] Read LessDOCKET
01/07/2020
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
01/07/2020
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/30/2019
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/30/2019
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/03/2017
DESCRIPTION: RECORD DESTROYED PURSUANT TO RULE 10.1028; NOTES: PER L173
[-] Read LessDOCKET
11/22/2002
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L173 B69
[-] Read LessDOCKET
11/17/2022
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
11/17/2022
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
03/01/2021
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: ***NOTE: ENTIRE FILE ELECTRONIC***
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
12/17/2020
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE COURT:* THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF REVIEW IS DENIED. *BEFORE NEEDHAM, ACTING P.J., BURNS, J., AND REARDON, J. (JUDGE OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ASSIGNED BY THE CHIEF JUSTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE VI, SECTION 6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION); AUTHOR: BURNS, GORDON B.; PARTICIPANTS: NEEDHAM, JR., HENRY E. REARDON, THOMAS MATTHEW
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/07/2020
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY JAN CHILTON FOR RESPONDENT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/05/2020
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY ARLYN ESCALANTE FOR APPELLANT; ATTORNEY HALLEN ROSNER WILL ARGUE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/18/2022
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
02/18/2022
DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/07/2023
DESCRIPTION: ORDER FILED.; NOTES: BY THE COURT: APPELLANT DAVID MARTIN'S SEPTEMBER 5,2023 REQUEST TO SET ASIDE HIS WAIVER OF ORAL ARGUMENT AND BE ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN ORAL ARGUMENT IS GRANTED. THE PARTIES WILL BE NOTIFIED OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT DATE AT A LATER TIME.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
08/21/2023
DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: ATTORNEY ROBERT BELES FOR APPELLANT; IN-PERSON APPEARANCE
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/03/2023
DESCRIPTION: ARGUMENT WAIVED BY: (NO RESPONSE - 10 DAY NOTICE); NOTES: NO PARTY CHECKED OPTION BE ON THE REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FORM
[-] Read LessDOCKET
07/03/2023
DESCRIPTION: FILED DOCUMENT ENTITLED:; NOTES: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FORM FROM ATTORNEY PAUL KLEVEN FOR APPELLANT; OPTION A CHECKED, APPELLANT WAIVES ORAL ARGUMENT
[-] Read LessDOCKET
11/08/2018
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L374
[-] Read LessDISPOSITION
01/11/2016
DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL BY THE COURT: * THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND ACCOMPANYING STAY REQUEST ARE DENIED. * BEFORE SIMONS, ACTING P.J., NEEDHAM, J., AND BRUINIERS, J.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
04/02/2018
DESCRIPTION: SHIPPED TO STATE RETENTION CENTER, BOX # / LIST #:; NOTES: L370
[-] Read LessDOCKET
05/03/2016
DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.
[-] Read LessHEARING
10/24/2023
DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.
[-] Read LessDOCKET
09/14/2023
DESCRIPTION: ELECTRONIC REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT FILED
[-] Read LessFirst Appellate District - Division 5
(California Courts of Appeal, California)
350 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA