This case was last updated from PACER on 09/18/2021 at 08:19:25 (UTC).

Whited v. Ford Motor Company

Case Summary

On September 17, 2021, Harley Whited (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”), represented by Stewart D. Matthews of SD Matthews & Associates, filed a personal injury lawsuit against Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”), seeking actual damages and cost of the suit along with pre-judgement and post-judgement interest, among other reliefs, for the alleged negligence of the Defendant that caused serious injuries to the Plaintiff. This case was filed in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Texas with Judge Reed C. O'Connor presiding.



In the complaint, the Plaintiff alleged that, “Allie Bindi was traveling west on Central Freeway. For unknown reasons Allie Bindi left his lane of travel and collided head-on with the vehicle driven by Harley Whited.” The Plaintiff then alleged that, “The subject Ford vehicle driven by Mrs. Whited was designed by Defendants Ford Motor Company. The result of the collision caused severe damage to the front of the Whited vehicle with extensive spooling of the seatbelt.”



The Plaintiff further alleged that, “At the time of the accident, Mrs. Whited was properly seated and properly wearing the available seat belt. As a result of the improper spooling and compartment compromise, Harley Whited sustained serious injuries when the vehicle failed to protect her because it violated several crashworthiness principles.” The Plaintiff then alleged that, “vehicle manufacturers have known for decades that crashworthiness is the science of preventing or minimizing injuries or death following an accident through the use of a vehicle’s various safety systems.”



The Plaintiff also alleged that, “Defendant Ford, either alone or in conjunction with some other individual(s) and/or entity(ies), designed, manufactured, marketed, assembled, and/or tested said vehicle in question.” Plaintiff then alleged that, “Defendant Ford either knew or should have known of at least one safer alternative design which would have prevented the serious injuries to the Plaintiff.” The Plaintiff also alleged that, “Defendant Ford was negligent in the manufacture, assembly, marketing, and/or testing of the vehicle in question. In designing a vehicle, efforts should be made by manufacturers to identify potential risks, hazards, and/or dangers that can lead to serious injury or death”



There are two claims of relief laid down by the Plaintiff. The first claim is for the alleged acts and/or omissions, design defects and negligence of Defendant Ford were the producing, direct, proximate and legal cause of the Plaintiffs’ serious injuries and damages. The second claim is for the alleged damages suffered by the Plaintiff, which include pain and suffering, emotional distress, mental anguish, impairment, and disfigurement, interference with her daily activities and a reduced capacity to enjoy life as a result of her injuries.



In her prayer for relief, the Plaintiff requested the Court for actual damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest beginning June 8, 2020; costs of suit; and all other relief, general and special, to which Plaintiff is entitled to at law and/or in equity, and/or which the Court deems proper.

 

This case summary may not reflect the current position of the parties to this litigation or the status of this case. Sign up to view the latest case updates and court documents.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    7:21-CV-00085

  • Filing Date:

    09/17/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Other Product Liability

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

Reed C. O'Connor

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

Harley Whited

Defendant

Ford Motor Company

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

Stewart D Matthews

Attorney at SD Matthews & Associates

2106 W Ennis Avenue, Suite B

Ennis, TX 75119

 

Court Documents

#4

(#4) Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (sre) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

#3

(#3) New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

#2

(#2) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Harley Whited. (Matthews, Stewart) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

1 #1

Cover Sheet

#1

(#1) COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Harley Whited. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12228280) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Matthews, Stewart) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

 

Docket Entries

  • 09/17/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#4) Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (sre) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/17/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/17/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Harley Whited. (Matthews, Stewart) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/17/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Harley Whited. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12228280) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Matthews, Stewart) (Entered: 09/17/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Ford Motor Company is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Stewart Donavan Matthews