Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from PACER on 05/11/2021 at 08:46:18 (UTC).

Nicole Thornhill et al v. Hyundai Motor Company et al

Case Summary

On March 12, 2021, Nicole Thornhill, Janet O’Brien and David Shaprio (the “Plaintiffs”), represented by Christopher Pitoun of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a personal injury class action lawsuit against Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America (both together “Hyundai”), Kia Motors Corporation, and Kia Motors America, Inc. (both together “Kia” and all collectively, “Defendants”), seeking recovery of damages and a repair under state consumer-protection statutes and implied warranties, and reimbursement of all expenses associated with the repair or replacement of the Class Vehicle for knowingly and intentionally concealing the Engine Defect in the Class Vehicles from Plaintiffs and Class members, along with concealing the risks, costs, and monetary damage resulting from the Engine Defect. This case was filed in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California with Judge John D. Early and Judge Josephine L. Staton presiding

 

Plaintiffs brought this action on behalf of themselves and as a class action under the provisions of Rules 23(a), b(2), and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of the all persons or entities who purchased or leased a Class Vehicle in the United States (the “Nationwide Class”) and on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased or leased a Class Vehicle in the State of California (the “California State Class”). 

 

In their complaint, the Plaintiffs alleged that “Certain Hyundai and Kia vehicles equipped with gasoline direct injection (“GDI”) and multipoint fuel injections (“MPI”) engines (“Class Vehicles”) contain an engine defect that presents consumers with an unacceptable risk of engine failure and spontaneous engine fire while driving. Hyundai and Kia knew before selling the Class Vehicles that their engines were defective, prone to premature and catastrophic failure, and posed an unreasonable risk of non-collision engine failures and fires.”

 

The Plaintiffs further alleged that “the catastrophic engine failure and fire risk is the direct result of a defect known to, concealed by, and still unremedied by Hyundai and Kia. Not only did Hyundai and Kia actively conceal the Engine Defect from consumers, but they also did not timely reveal that the Engine Defect poses a serious safety hazard” and that “despite Hyundai and Kia’s knowledge of the Engine Defect, the automakers have issued piecemeal and belated recalls over the last six years—most recently, the recall of the Class Vehicles—all while omitting similar vehicles without apparent explanation.”

 

There are four claims for relief laid down by the Plaintiffs. All four claims laid down on behalf of the Nationwide Class or, alternatively, the California Class are for Defendant’s violations of the CLRA under California Civil Code § 1782(a) regarding the Class Vehicles,  California Civil Code §§ 1668, 1709, 1710, and 1750, et seq., California Commercial Code § 2313, and violations of California False Advertising Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500, et. seq.) and violations of California False Advertising Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500, et. seq.).

In their prayer for relief, the Plaintiffs have requested the court to pass an order to certify the class as has been claimed under the complaint and to award damages including actual, compensatory, general, special, incidental, statutory, punitive, and consequential damages, costs, and disgorgement with pre and post judgment interest, along with injunctive and declaratory relief and costs of litigation.

 

This case summary may not reflect the current position of the parties to this litigation or the status of this case. Sign up to view the latest case updates and court documents.

 

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    8:21-CV-00481

  • Filing Date:

    03/12/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle Product Liability

  • Court:

    U.S. District Courts

  • Courthouse:

    California Central District

Judge Details

Referral Judge

John D. Early

Presiding Judge

Josephine L. Staton

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

David Shapiro

Janet O'Brien

Nicole Thornhill

Defendants

Hyundai Motor Company, -

Hyundai Motor America

Kia Motors America, Inc.

Kia Motors Corporation

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

Christopher Pitoun

Attorney at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

301 North Lake Avenue Suite 920

Pasadena, CA 91101

Rachel E. Fitzpatrick

Attorney at Hages Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

11 West Jefferson Suite 1000

Phoenix, AZ 85003

Steve W. Berman

Attorney at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

1301 2Nd Avenue Suite 2000

Seattle, WA 98101

Defendant Attorney

Shon Morgan

Attorney at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP

865 South Figueroa Street 10Th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543

 

Court Documents

#19

(#19) ORDER APPROVING The Parties Stipulation as to Service of Process #16 by Judge Josephine L. Staton,. (See document for further information). (jp) (Entered: 03/29/2021)

#18

(#18) CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, identifying Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, Nicole Thornhill, Janet O'Brien, and David Shapiro. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

#17

(#17) CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, identifying Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, Nicole Thornhill, Janet O'Brien, and David Shapiro. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

#15

(#15) WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by defendant Kia Motors Corporation. upon Kia Motors Corporation waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/18/2021, answer due 6/16/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Shon Morgan. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

#14

(#14) WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by defendant Kia Motors America, Inc.. upon Kia Motors America, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/18/2021, answer due 5/17/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Shon Morgan. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

#13

No Description Available

#12

No Description Available

#11

No Description Available

#10

(#10) ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:17-cv-00481 JLS(JDEx). Case transferred from Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-00481 JLS(JDEx). Signed by Judge Josephine L. Staton (rn) (Entered: 03/18/2021)

#9

(#9) NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rachel E. Fitzpatrick. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

#8

(#8) NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Steve W. Berman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

#6

(#6) NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) (Entered: 03/15/2021)

#4

(#4) NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill. Related Case(s): 8:18-cv-02223-JLS-JDE (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

#3

(#3) NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill, identifying Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Kia Motors Corporation, and Kia Motors America, Inc.. (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

#2

(#2) CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill. (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

9 More Documents Available
View All Documents

 

Docket Entries

  • 04/08/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#23) Text Only ORDER Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel E. Fitzpatrick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill #22 pursuant to the Courts directive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/08/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/06/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#22) APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rachel E. Fitzpatrick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31052693) filed by plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 04/06/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/31/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#21) Text Only ORDER GRANTING Application of Non-Resident Attorney Steve W. Berman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill #20 pursuant to the Courts directive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/31/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/30/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#20) APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Steve W. Berman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31012371) filed by plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/30/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/29/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#19) ORDER APPROVING The Parties Stipulation as to Service of Process #16 by Judge Josephine L. Staton,. (See document for further information). (jp) (Entered: 03/29/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#18) CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, identifying Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, Nicole Thornhill, Janet O'Brien, and David Shapiro. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#17) CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, identifying Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation, Nicole Thornhill, Janet O'Brien, and David Shapiro. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#16) Joint STIPULATION for Order regarding service filed by defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Shon Morgan added to party Hyundai Motor America(pty:dft), Attorney Shon Morgan added to party Hyundai Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Shon Morgan added to party Kia Motors America, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Shon Morgan added to party Kia Motors Corporation(pty:dft))(Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#15) WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by defendant Kia Motors Corporation. upon Kia Motors Corporation waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/18/2021, answer due 6/16/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Shon Morgan. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/25/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#14) WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by defendant Kia Motors America, Inc.. upon Kia Motors America, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/18/2021, answer due 5/17/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Shon Morgan. (Morgan, Shon) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
3 More Docket Entries
  • 03/18/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#10) ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:17-cv-00481 JLS(JDEx). Case transferred from Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-00481 JLS(JDEx). Signed by Judge Josephine L. Staton (rn) (Entered: 03/18/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/16/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#9) NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rachel E. Fitzpatrick. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/16/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#8) NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Steve W. Berman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/16/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#7) INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/15/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#6) NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) (Entered: 03/15/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/15/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#5) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) (Entered: 03/15/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/12/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#4) NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill. Related Case(s): 8:18-cv-02223-JLS-JDE (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/12/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill, identifying Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Kia Motors Corporation, and Kia Motors America, Inc.. (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/12/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Janet O'Brien, David Shapiro, Nicole Thornhill. (Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/12/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30912814 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Nicole Thornhill, David Shapiro, Janet O'Brien. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nicole Thornhill Re: CLRA Venue, #2 Declaration of Janet O'Brien Re: CLRA Venue, #3 Declaration of David Shapiro Re: CLRA Venue) (Attorney Christopher Pitoun added to party Janet O'Brien(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher Pitoun added to party David Shapiro(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher Pitoun added to party Nicole Thornhill(pty:pla))(Pitoun, Christopher) (Entered: 03/12/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Kia Motors Corporation is a litigant

Latest cases where HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA is a litigant

Latest cases where Kia Motors America, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Shon Morgan