This case was last updated from PACER on 10/19/2021 at 05:05:54 (UTC).

Wareka v. Shutterstock, Inc.et al

Case Summary

On October 15, 2021, Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams (“Williams” or “Plaintiff”), represented by Rayminh Ngo of Nao Law Practice, filed an intellectual property lawsuit against Shutterstock, Inc. (“Shutterstock”) and DOES 1-10 (“Defendants”), seeking injunctive relief and damages along with prejudgement and post-judgement interests among other relief for the alleged copyright infringement by Defendants. This case was filed in the United States District Court in the Eastern District of New York.

 

In the complaint, Plaintiff alleged that, “Williams licenses her work for a fee. Williams’ portfolio includes international clients, and Williams’ work has been featured in top publications such as Vogue, Harper’s Bazaar, Marie Claire, Elle, L’Officiel, Glamour, Cosmopolitan, Maxim, and many more. Additionally, her work has been used commercially by brands such as NARS, KKW, Fenty, and Benefit” and “Williams is the sole author and exclusive rights holder to one photograph of the model known professionally as Kiana Alexis.”

 

Plaintiff further alleged that, “Williams is informed and believes Shutterstock utilizes the Website for commercial purposes to license the stock photography content displayed on the Website” and “Williams is informed and believes Shutterstock has the ability to supervise and control the content on the Website.” The Plaintiff also alleged that, “On or about July 23, 2021, Williams discovered Shutterstock had used the Kiana Photograph on the Website” and “Williams did not consent to or authorize Shutterstock to use the Kiana Photograph on the Website.”

 

Plaintiff also alleged that, “Williams also discovered that the Kiana Photograph, as it was being displayed on the Website, included Shutterstock’s watermark” and “After discovering the infringement, Williams (through counsel) sent cease and desist correspondence to Shutterstock, regarding the Kiana Photograph, and requested an accounting of all licenses sold and sales data for the Kiana Photograph. Williams’s counsel attempted to settle the matter prior to filing this Compliant but was not successful.” The Plaintiff also alleged that, “Williams is informed and believes Shutterstock knew it did not have permission to use the Kiana Photograph on its website and willfully infringed Williams’ Kiana Photograph” and “Williams is informed and believes Shutterstock knowingly falsified the watermark on the Kiana Photograph, as used on the website, in order to conceal its infringing conduct.”

 

There are two claims of relief laid down by Plaintiff. The first claim is for the alleged copyright infringement 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The second claim is for the alleged falsification of copyright management information 17 U.S.C. § 1202.

 

In the prayer for relief, Plaintiff requested the court for injunctive relief and an award of actual damages and disgorgement of all profits attributable to the infringement as provided by 17 U.S.C. §504(b) in an amount to be proven or, in the alternative, at Williams’ election, an award for statutory damages against Shutterstock in an amount up to $150,000 for each infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), whichever is larger, along with costs of litigation and reasonable attorney’s fees, statutory damages against Shutterstock in an amount up to $25,000 with prejudgement and post-judgement interest, and any other relief the court deems just and proper.

 

This case summary may not reflect the current position of the parties to this litigation or the status of this case. Sign up to view the latest case updates and court documents.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    1:21-CV-05784

  • Filing Date:

    10/15/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Intellectual Property - Copyright

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

TAMARA WAREKA a/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS

Defendants

SHUTTERSTOCK, INC.

DOES 1-10, inclusive

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

Rayminh Ngo

Attorney at Nao Law Practice

715 East 3900 South, Suite 209

Salt Lake City, UT 84107

 

Court Documents

1 #1

Main Document

1 #1

Exhibit A

1 #2

Civil Cover Sheet

1 #3

Proposed Summons

#2

 

Docket Entries

  • 10/15/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) Corporate Disclosure Statement by TAMARA WAREKA a/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS (Ngo, Rayminh) (Entered: 10/15/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/15/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) COMPLAINT against DOES 1-10, inclusive, SHUTTERSTOCK, INC. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14939668 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by TAMARA WAREKA a/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Ngo, Rayminh) (Entered: 10/15/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Shutterstock.com is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Rayminh L. Ngo