This case was last updated from U.S. District Courts on 12/26/2022 at 06:29:47 (UTC).

Schultz v. Ford Motor Company

Case Summary

On 11/23/2022 Schultz filed a Contract - Other Contract lawsuit against Ford Motor Company. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, Illinois Northern District Court. The Judge overseeing this case is Franklin U. Valderrama. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    1:22-CV-06586

  • Filing Date:

    11/23/2022

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Other Contract

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

Franklin U. Valderrama

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

Joseph Schultz

Defendant

Ford Motor Company

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

Harry Christopher Bradley

Attorney at H.C. Bradley LLC

4320 Winfield Rd #200

Warrenville, IL 60555

Defendant Attorney

Edward E. Fu

Attorney at Donohue Brown Mathewson & Smyth LLC

131 South Dearborn Street, Ste 1600

Chicago, IL 60603

 

Court Documents

1 #1

Main Document

1 #1

Exhibit Exhibit 1

#2

(#2) ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Edward E. Fu (Fu, Edward) (Entered: 11/23/2022)

#4

(#4) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 02/06/2023, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) by that date, the removing party's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of notice of removal by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice (axc). (Entered: 11/28/2022)

#5

(#5) CIVIL Cover Sheet (Fu, Edward) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

#6

(#6) MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (kl, ) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

 

Docket Entries

  • 11/28/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#6) MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (kl, ) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/28/2022
  • DocketCLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kl, ) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/28/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#5) CIVIL Cover Sheet (Fu, Edward) (Entered: 11/28/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/28/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#4) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 02/06/2023, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. The removing party must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the opposing party has not been served with notice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) by that date, the removing party's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of notice of removal by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice (axc). (Entered: 11/28/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/23/2022
  • Docket(#3) ORDER: #Local Rule 3.1# requires at the time of filing a case, plaintiff's counsel, or if the case is filed pro se, the plaintiff shall file with the original papers a completed designation sheet (civil cover sheet). No civil cover sheet was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Ford Motor Company is directed to file the #Civil Cover Sheet# within 14 days of this notification. Signed by the Executive Committee. (kra, ) (Entered: 11/23/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/23/2022
  • DocketCASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) (Entered: 11/23/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/23/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Edward E. Fu (Fu, Edward) (Entered: 11/23/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/23/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) NOTICE of Removal from DuPage County, 18th Judicial Circuit, case number (2022LA000900) filed by Ford Motor Company Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20077153. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Fu, Edward) (Entered: 11/23/2022)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Ford Motor Company is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Edward Fu Esq.