2:21-CV-00020
01/05/2021
Pending - Other Pending
Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury
Richard M Gergel
Mary Roe 1818
Bishop of Charleston, The
Anna Elizabeth Richter
Attorney at Richter Firm LLC
622 Johnnie Dodds Boulevard
Mount Pleasant, SC 29464
Lawrence Edward Richter, Jr
Attorney at Richter Firm
622 Johnnie Dodds Boulevard
Mt Pleasant, SC 29464
Richard S Dukes, Jr
Attorney at Turner Padget Graham and Laney
Po Box 22129, 40 Calhoun Street, Suite 200
Charleston, SC 29413-2129
Megan Rudd
Attorney at Turner Padget Graham and Laney
Po Box 1509
Greenville, SC 29602
Exhibit Order denying Defs' motion for partial summary judgment (Roe)
Exhibit Order denying Defs' motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doe)
Exhibit Transcript of Record 7.17.19
Exhibit Settlement Agreement in Class Action case
Exhibit Limited Warranty Deed
Exhibit Diocese Defs' Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment
Exhibit Complaint in 2014-CP-10-1283
Exhibit Orders denying Motions to Dismiss in Doe and Roe
Exhibit Motions to Dismiss in Doe and Roe (page 1)
Memo in Support
Memo in Support to Dismiss Bishop of Charleston, in his Official Capacity
Docket(#13) ORDER: The Bishop of the Diocese of Charleston, in his Official Capacity's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/3/21.(ltap, ) Modified on 3/3/2021 to edit docket text "Signed by", remove "Entered at the Direction of"(sshe, ). (Entered: 03/03/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#12) ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Dioceses motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 8) is DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/1/21.(ltap, ) Modified on 3/1/2021 to edit docket text, remove "TEXT" and "Entered at the Direction of" from ORDER (sshe, ). (Entered: 03/01/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#11) REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss , #8 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Bishop of Charleston, The(in His Official Capacity), Bishop of Charleston, The(a Corporation Sole). (Rudd, Megan) (Entered: 02/16/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#10) RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss , #8 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Mary Roe 1818.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/16/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motions to Dismiss in Doe and Roe (page 1), #2 Exhibit Orders denying Motions to Dismiss in Doe and Roe, #3 Exhibit Complaint in 2014-CP-10-1283, #4 Exhibit Diocese Defs' Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment, #5 Exhibit Limited Warranty Deed, #6 Exhibit Settlement Agreement in Class Action case, #7 Exhibit Transcript of Record 7.17.19, #8 Exhibit Order denying Defs' motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doe), #9 Exhibit Order denying Defs' motion for partial summary judgment (Roe))(Richter, Lawrence) (Entered: 02/09/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#9) MOTION to Dismiss by Bishop of Charleston, The(a Corporation Sole). Response to Motion due by 2/9/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(Dukes, Richard) (Entered: 01/26/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#8) MOTION to Dismiss by Bishop of Charleston, The(in His Official Capacity). Response to Motion due by 2/9/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support to Dismiss Bishop of Charleston, in his Official Capacity)No proposed order.(Dukes, Richard) (Entered: 01/26/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#7) Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mary Roe 1818.(Richter, Lawrence) (Entered: 01/18/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#6) SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Roe 1818. Bishop of Charleston, The(in His Official Capacity) served on 1/5/2021, answer due 1/26/2021.(Richter, Lawrence) Filing corrected for event type with corrected signature document as provided by filing user (sshe, ) (Entered: 01/15/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#5) SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Roe 1818. Bishop of Charleston, The(a Corporation Sole) served on 1/5/2021, answer due 1/26/2021.(Richter, Lawrence) Filing corrected for event type with corrected signature document as provided by filing user (sshe, ) (Entered: 01/15/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#4) NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Rudd on behalf of Bishop of Charleston, The(in His Official Capacity), Bishop of Charleston, The(a Corporation Sole) (Rudd, Megan) (Entered: 01/13/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#2) Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Bishop of Charleston, The(in His Official Capacity), Bishop of Charleston, The(a Corporation Sole).(sshe, ) (Entered: 01/05/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#1) NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 21-CP-10-00011. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9566263), filed by Bishop of Charleston, The(in His Official Capacity), Bishop of Charleston, The(a Corporation Sole). (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Richard S. Dukes)(sshe, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2021: #3 Exhibit A to Complaint filed in State Court, #4 Exhibit B to Complaint filed in State Court, #5 Exhibit Verification of plaintiff) (sshe, ). Modified on 1/14/2021 to add additional documents inadvertently not filed as requested and provided by filing user(sshe, ). (Entered: 01/05/2021)
[-] Read LessDig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases