1:21-CV-10993
12/22/2021
Pending - Other Pending
Civil Right - Other Disability Discrimination
Analisa Torres
Juan Ortega
Sazerac Company, Inc.
Jonathan Phillip Rubin
Attorney at Law Office Of Jonathan P. Rubin PLLC
3000 Marcus Ave., Ste 1E5
Lake Success, NY 11042
Edward Y. Kroub
Attorney at Mizrahi Kroub LLP
200 Vesey Street
New York, NY 10281
Sean Joseph Kirby
Attorney at Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
(#1) COMPLAINT against Sazerac Company, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25502921)Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Rubin, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
(#2) CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rubin, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
(#3) REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sazerac Company, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Rubin, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
(#4) ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sazerac Company, Inc...(gp) (Entered: 12/27/2021)
(#5) ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/14/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
(#6) INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by February 21, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/14/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
(#7) ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by February 21, 2022, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, as further set forth herein. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by February 21, 2022, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/14/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
Main Document
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
(#9) RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Sazerac Company, Inc...(Kirby, Sean) (Entered: 02/07/2022)
(#10) NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward Y. Kroub on behalf of Juan Ortega..(Kroub, Edward) (Entered: 02/10/2022)
Docket(#10) NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edward Y. Kroub on behalf of Juan Ortega..(Kroub, Edward) (Entered: 02/10/2022)
[-] Read LessDocket(#9) RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Sazerac Company, Inc...(Kirby, Sean) (Entered: 02/07/2022)
[-] Read LessDocket(#8) ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Sazerac Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C).(Kirby, Sean) (Entered: 02/03/2022)
[-] Read LessDocket(#7) ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by February 21, 2022, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, as further set forth herein. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by February 21, 2022, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/14/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
[-] Read LessDocket(#6) INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by February 21, 2022, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/14/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
[-] Read LessDocket(#5) ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/14/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 01/14/2022)
[-] Read LessDocket(#4) ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sazerac Company, Inc...(gp) (Entered: 12/27/2021)
[-] Read LessDocketCase Designated ECF. (gp) (Entered: 12/27/2021)
[-] Read LessDocketMagistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) (Entered: 12/27/2021)
[-] Read LessDocketCASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) (Entered: 12/27/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#3) REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sazerac Company, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Rubin, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#2) CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rubin, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
[-] Read LessDocket(#1) COMPLAINT against Sazerac Company, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25502921)Document filed by Juan Ortega..(Rubin, Jonathan) (Entered: 12/22/2021)
[-] Read LessDig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases