This case was last updated from U.S. District Courts on 06/18/2022 at 07:06:21 (UTC).

Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al

Case Summary

On 06/17/2022 Kim filed a Finance - Consumer Credit lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase Bank N A. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, New York Eastern District Court. The Judges overseeing this case are Eric N. Vitaliano and Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    1:22-CV-03585

  • Filing Date:

    06/17/2022

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Finance - Consumer Credit

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

Eric N. Vitaliano

Referral Judge

Ramon E. Reyes, Jr

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

Young Sook Kim

Defendants

JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Barclays Bank Delaware

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Equifax Information Services, LLC

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

Nicola Carlene Richards

Attorney at Sanders Law Group

100 Garden City Plaza, Fifth Floor

Garden City, NY 11530

Defendant Attorney

Christopher B. Turcotte

Attorney at Turcotte Law, P.C.

575 Madison Avenue, Suite 1006

New York, NY 10022

 

Court Documents

1 #1

Main Document

1 #1

Exhibit 1 (State Court Summons & Complaint)

1 #2

Exhibit 2 (Consents to Removal)

1 #3

Civil Cover Sheet

#2

(#2) Corporate Disclosure Statement by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. (Turcotte, Christopher) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

#3

(#3) In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

#4

(#4) This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/17/2022
  • DocketORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Diane Gujarati recused. Case reassigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano for all further proceedings. Type of Recusal: party.Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 6/17/2022. (Mahoney, Brenna) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2022
  • DocketThis case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#4) This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2022
  • DocketCase Assigned to Judge Diane Gujarati and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) Corporate Disclosure Statement by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.. (Turcotte, Christopher) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. from Queens County Supreme Court, case number 710274-2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15672272) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (State Court Summons & Complaint), #2 Exhibit 2 (Consents to Removal), #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Turcotte, Christopher) (Entered: 06/17/2022)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where BARCLAYS BANK is a litigant

Latest cases where Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where JPMorgan Chase Bank NA is a litigant