This case was last updated from PACER on 09/18/2021 at 07:59:28 (UTC).

Foundation Food Group, Inc. et al v. Selective Way Insurance Company

Case Summary

 On September 17, 2021, Foundation Food Group, Inc. and Prime-Pak Foods, Inc. (collectively, “FFG” or “Plaintiffs”), represented by David Austin Bersinger of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, filed an insurance lawsuit against Selective Way Insurance Company (“Selective” or “Defendant”), seeking declaratory judgement along with attorney’s fees for the alleged breach of contract by the defendant. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Georgia with Judge Richard W. Story presiding.

 

In the complaint the plaintiffs alleged that, “FFG owns and operates four poultry production plants in Gainesville, Georgia. On and around January 28, 2021, a freezer in one of the poultry production plants, Plant 4, suffered physical damage and malfunctioned, causing a liquid nitrogen (LN2) overflow in the Plant 4 freezer room. Six (6) FFG employees died as a result of the freezer incident (the “Incident”), and several others suffered physical injuries. The Hall County Fire Department (“HCFD”) responded to the Incident and took control of Plant 4. Federal government agencies launched investigations into the Incident and took control of Plant 4 from the HCFD.”

 

The plaintiffs further alleged that, “Plant 4 was deemed an accident and crime scene; no one was allowed to enter for several days, and FFG was prevented from operating for several weeks. As a result of the Incident, FFG suffered over $2,000,000 in property loss, business income loss, and extra expense. FFG maintains commercial general property insurance for Plant 4 with Selective. FFG maintains the Selective Policy to cover risks like the January 28, 2021 Incident. FFG promptly reported the Incident and its losses to Selective. For the eight (8) months following the Incident, Selective has failed to pay any amount to cover FFG’s losses. Instead of paying covered losses, Selective has drowned FFG in requests for information and further explanations.”

 

The plaintiffs also alleged that, “FFG has complied with all of Selective’s requests and produced over 2400 pages of Bates-labeled documents to Selective. FFG also submitted sworn Proofs of Loss for its claims, as well as follow-up narratives and further explanations requested by Selective. Selective rejected FFG’s Proofs of Loss in total and continues to request additional information from FFG. By repeatedly failing to pay any amount towards FFG’s over $2,000,000 in losses, Selective has breached its duties to FFG under the Policy. . Selective’s dilatory failure to pay FFG’s covered losses has caused additional damage to FFG, including a forced sale of the company. Without coverage from Selective, FFG continues and will continue to suffer additional damages.”

 

There are three claims for relief laid down by the plaintiffs. The first claim is for declaratory judgement, the second claim is for the alleged breach of contract and the third claim is for the attorney’s fees.

 

In its prayer for relief the plaintiffs have requested the court to enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant on all of FFG’s claims and a declaration that the defendant must reimburse the plaintiffs for losses that the plaintiffs incurred as a result of the incident. The plaintiffs have also requested the court to hold that the defendant has breached its obligations under the Policy by failing to reimburse the plaintiffs for any of the losses that the plaintiffs incurred as a result of the incident.

 

This case summary may not reflect the current position of the parties to this litigation or the status of this case. Sign up to view the latest case updates and court documents.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    2:21-CV-00207

  • Filing Date:

    09/17/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Insurance

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

Richard W. Story

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

Foundation Food Group, Inc.

Prime-Pak Foods, Inc.

Defendant

Selective Way Insurance Company

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

David Austin Bersinger

Attorney at Barnes & Thornburg LLP

3475 Piedmont Road N.E., Suite 1700

Atlanta, GA 30305-3327

 

Court Documents

1 #15

Civil Cover Sheet

1 #14

Exhibit N

1 #13

Exhibit M

1 #12

Exhibit L

1 #11

Exhibit K

1 #10

Exhibit J

1 #9

Exhibit I

1 #8

Exhibit H

1 #7

Exhibit G

1 #6

Exhibit F

1 #5

Exhibit E

1 #4

Exhibit D

1 #3

Exhibit C

1 #2

Exhibit B

1 #1

Exhibit A

#1

(#1) COMPLAINT, with Jury Demand, filed by Foundation Food Group, Inc., Prime-Pak Foods, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11265494) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Entered: 09/17/2021)

5 More Documents Available
View All Documents

 

Docket Entries

  • 09/17/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) COMPLAINT, with Jury Demand, filed by Foundation Food Group, Inc., Prime-Pak Foods, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11265494) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Entered: 09/17/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Selective Way Insurance Company is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer David Austin Bersinger