Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from PACER on 07/01/2021 at 17:44:41 (UTC).

City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc. et al

Case Summary

On 06/09/2021 City of East St Louis filed an Other - Communication lawsuit against Netflix, Inc. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, Illinois Southern District. The Judge overseeing this case is Mark A. Beatty. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    3:21-CV-00561

  • Filing Date:

    06/09/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other - Communication

  • Court:

    U.S. District Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Illinois Southern District

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

Mark A. Beatty

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

City of East St. Louis, Illinois

City of East St. Louis

Defendants

Peacock TV, LLC

DirectTV Corporation

Hulu, LLC

Amazon. Com Services, LLC

Apple. Inc.

CBS Entertainment, LLC

Home Box Office, Inc.

Netflix, Inc.

CuriosityStream, Inc.

Dish Network Service, LLC

Disney Streaming Services, LLC

YouTube, Inc.

Amazon.com Services, LLC

Apple Inc.

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

Charles J Baricevic

Attorney at Chatham & Baricevic

107 West Main Street

Belleville, IL 62220

John J. Driscoll

Attorney at Driscoll Firm, LLC

1311 Avenida Juan Ponce De Leon, 6Th Floor

San Juan, PR 00907

 

Court Documents

#17

(#17) Summonses Issued as to Netflix, Inc., Disney Streaming Services, LLC, Apple Inc., Hulu, LLC, Home Box Office, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC, CBS Entertainment, LLC, YouTube, Inc., CuriosityStream, Inc., Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, and Dish Network Service, LLC. Original summonses mailed to Attorney Baricevic. (kek) (Entered: 06/11/2021)

#16

(#16) NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Driscoll on behalf of City of East St. Louis (Driscoll, John) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#15

(#15) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#14

(#14) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#13

(#13) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#12

(#12) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#11

(#11) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#10

(#10) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#9

(#9) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#8

(#8) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#7

(#7) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#6

(#6) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#5

(#5) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#4

(#4) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#3

(#3) NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: City of East St. Louis. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:21-cv-561-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 7/1/2021. (kls3) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

#2

(#2) NOTICE of Appearance by Charles J Baricevic on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/09/2021)

1 #1

Civil Cover Sheet

#1

(#1) COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4499307.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/09/2021)

7 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/11/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#17) Summonses Issued as to Netflix, Inc., Disney Streaming Services, LLC, Apple Inc., Hulu, LLC, Home Box Office, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC, CBS Entertainment, LLC, YouTube, Inc., CuriosityStream, Inc., Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, and Dish Network Service, LLC. Original summonses mailed to Attorney Baricevic. (kek) (Entered: 06/11/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#16) NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Driscoll on behalf of City of East St. Louis (Driscoll, John) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#15) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#14) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#13) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#12) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#11) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#10) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#9) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#8) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#7) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#6) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#5) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#4) Summons Requested. (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in the case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 257, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or nonconsent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: City of East St. Louis. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #http://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:21-cv-561-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 7/1/2021. (kls3) (Entered: 06/10/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/09/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) NOTICE of Appearance by Charles J Baricevic on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/09/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/09/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0754-4499307.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baricevic, Charles) (Entered: 06/09/2021)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Peacock TV LLC is a litigant

Latest cases where Home Box Office, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where YOUTUBE is a litigant

Latest cases where NETFLIX INC is a litigant