Search

Attributes

This case was last updated from PACER on 04/20/2021 at 09:16:08 (UTC).

Brown County Publishing Company, Inc. et al v. Google LLC et al

Case Summary

On April 19, 2021, Brown County Publishing Company, Inc. and Multi Media Channels, LLC (“Multi media” or “Plaintiffs”), represented by Erin K. Dickinson of Crueger Dickinson LLC, filed an antitrust action against Google, LLC and Facebook, Inc. (“Defendants”), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and an accounting of damages along with treble damages for allegedly monopolizing and conspiring to engage in anticompetitive conduct and unjust enrichment by the Defendants. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin with Judge William C. Griesbach presiding.

 

In its complaint, the Plaintiffs alleged that “Plaintiffs, and other newspapers across the country, compete for revenue in the digital advertising market. Google monopolizes the market to such an extent that it threatens the extinction of local newspapers across the country. There is no longer a competitive market in which newspapers can fairly compete for online advertising revenue. Google has vertically integrated itself, through hundreds of mergers and acquisitions, to enable dominion over all sellers, buyers, and middlemen in the marketplace. It has absorbed the market internally and consumed most of the revenue. Google’s unlawful anticompetitive conduct is directly stripping newspapers across the country, including Plaintiffs, of their primary revenue source.”

 

The Plaintiff further alleged that “Google and Facebook, archrivals in the digital advertising market, conspired to further their worldwide dominance of the digital advertising market in a secret agreement codenamed “Jedi Blue.” The two archrivals, who are sometimes referenced as operating a duopoly in the market, unlawfully conspired to manipulate online auctions which generate digital advertising revenue. Facebook and Google agreed to avoid competing with another in September 2018. The quid pro quo was as follows—Facebook would largely forego its foray into header bidding and would instead bid through Google’s ad server. In exchange, Google agreed to give Facebook preferential treatment in its auctions. This agreement closed a growing threat to Google’s primacy and further cemented its stranglehold on the marketplace. These actions are illegal and directly caused newspapers across the country, including Plaintiffs, enormous financial harm in the form of loss of revenue sources.”

 

There are three claims for relief laid down by the Plaintiff. The first claim is for Google’s Monopolization of the Digital Advertising Market, hence, for alleged violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act: 15 U.S.C. § 2. The second claim is for Google and Facebook’s unlawful agreement to unreasonably restrain the trade, hence, for alleged violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act: 15 U.S.C. § 1. The third claim is for alleged Unjust Enrichment.

 

In its prayer for relief, the Plaintiff has requested the court to declare that the Defendants’ actions violate the law, and to award damages, treble damages, punitive damages, and/or restitution in an amount to be determined at trial. The Plaintiffs further requested the Court to permanently enjoin Defendants from continuing, maintaining, or renewing the conduct alleged herein, and from adopting or following any practice, plan, program, or device having a similar purpose or effect, and award Plaintiffs pre- and post-judgment interest and their costs of suit, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.

 

This case summary may not reflect the current position of the parties to this litigation or the status of this case. Sign up to view the latest case updates and court documents.



Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    2:21-CV-00498

  • Filing Date:

    04/19/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other - Antitrust

  • Court:

    U.S. District Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Wisconsin Eastern District

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

Brown County Publishing Company, Inc.

Multi Media Channels, LLC

Defendants

Google LLC

Facebook Inc

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

Erin K Dickinson

Attorney at Crueger Dickinson LLC

4532 N Oakland Ave

Whitefish Bay, WI 53211

 

Court Documents

1 #3

Summons Google LLC

1 #2

Summons Facebook Inc

1 #1

Civil Cover Sheet

#1

(#1) COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Brown County Publishing Company, Inc., Multi Media Channels, LLC. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3796080) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Facebook Inc, #3 Summons Google LLC)(Dickinson, Erin)

 

Docket Entries

  • 04/19/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Brown County Publishing Company, Inc., Multi Media Channels, LLC. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3796080) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Facebook Inc, #3 Summons Google LLC)(Dickinson, Erin)

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Google LLC is a litigant

Latest cases where Facebook is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Erin Kathleen Dickinson