This case was last updated from PACER on 03/03/2020 at 08:02:00 (UTC).

Bennett v. Social Security Administration

Case Summary

On 01/03/2020 Bennett filed a Government Benefit - Social Security Disability lawsuit against Social Security Administration. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, New Mexico District. The Judge overseeing this case is Stephan M. Vidmar. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    1:20-CV-00008

  • Filing Date:

    01/03/2020

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Government Benefit - Social Security Disability

  • Court:

    U.S. District Courts

  • Courthouse:

    New Mexico District

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

Stephan M. Vidmar

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

Derek A. Bennett

Defendant

Social Security Administration

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

Timothy Burns

Attorney at Keller & Keller

2850 N. Meridian St.

Indianapolis, IN 46208

Matthew Frederick Richter

Attorney at Keller & Keller LLP

2850 N. Meridian St.

Indianapolis, IN 46208

 

Court Documents

#3

RESTRICTED

 

Docket Entries

  • 01/29/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Richter on behalf of Derek A. Bennett (Richter, Matthew) (Entered: 01/29/2020)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/10/2020
  • DocketSummons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (arp) (Entered: 01/10/2020)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/03/2020
  • Docket(#2) PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (aek) (Entered: 01/03/2020)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/03/2020
  • DocketUnited States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (aek) (Entered: 01/03/2020)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/03/2020
  • DocketFiling and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6882742 re 1 Complaint filed by DEREK A. BENNETT (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Burns, Timothy) (Entered: 01/03/2020)

    Read MoreRead Less

Please submit a removal request if you do not want this court record to appear in search engine results.