This case was last updated from U.S. District Courts on 01/15/2021 at 10:08:20 (UTC).

Aguilar-Souza v. Jensen et al

Case Summary

On 11/16/2020 Aguilar-Souza filed a Prisoner - Prison Condition lawsuit against Jensen. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, Arizona District. The Judges overseeing this case are Michelle H Burns (PS), John J Tuchi and Michelle H Burns. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    2:20-CV-02194

  • Filing Date:

    11/16/2020

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Prisoner - Prison Condition

  • Courthouse:

    Arizona District

Judge Details

Presiding Judge

John J Tuchi

Referral Judges

Michelle H Burns (PS)

Michelle H Burns

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

Octavio Aguilar-Souza

Defendants

Claritza Perez

Cynthia

Edwin Jensen

Centurion of Arizona LLC

James W Baird

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

Joane E Hallinan

Attorney at Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm

5240 E Pima St.

Tucson, AZ 85712

Kirstin T Eidenbach

Attorney at Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm

5240 E Pima St.

Tucson, AZ 85712

Jeremy Wade Killpack

Attorney at Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm

5240 E Pima St.

Tucson, AZ 85712

Audrey Corinne Miller

Attorney at Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm

5240 E Pima St.

Tucson, AZ 85712

 

Court Documents

#4

(#4) ORDER: Plaintiff must either serve Defendants in compliance with the applicable rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court, or seek a waiver of service from Defendants. If Plaintiff does not obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv 16.2(b)(2)(B)(ii). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/11/20. (SST) (Entered: 12/11/2020)

#3

(#3) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DLC) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

2 #3

Summons

2 #2

Summons

2 #1

Summons

#2

(#2) SUMMONS Submitted by Octavio Aguilar-Souza. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(DLC) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

1 #2

Affidavit Certification of Medical Expert Necessity Pursuant to A.R.S. 12

1 #1

Civil Cover Sheet

#1

(#1) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18878896 filed by Octavio Aguilar-Souza. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Certification of Medical Expert Necessity Pursuant to A.R.S. 12.2603(A))(DLC) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

 

Docket Entries

  • 12/11/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#4) ORDER: Plaintiff must either serve Defendants in compliance with the applicable rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court, or seek a waiver of service from Defendants. If Plaintiff does not obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv 16.2(b)(2)(B)(ii). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/11/20. (SST) (Entered: 12/11/2020)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/16/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DLC) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/16/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) SUMMONS Submitted by Octavio Aguilar-Souza. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(DLC) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/16/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-18878896 filed by Octavio Aguilar-Souza. (Eidenbach, Kirstin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Certification of Medical Expert Necessity Pursuant to A.R.S. 12.2603(A))(DLC) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less