This case was last updated from PACER on 09/14/2019 06:02:29

Get the Latest Court Record Available:

Case Summary

On 07/16/2019 a Civil Right - Other Civil Right case was filed by Worsten Andrews against City of Pittsburg, in the jurisdiction of U.S. Courts Of Appeals, U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Case Details

  • Case Number 19-16399
  • Filing Date 07/16/2019
  • Case Status Pending - Other Pending
  • Case Type Civil Right - Other Civil Right
  • Jurisdiction U.S. Courts Of Appeals
  • Courthouse U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Party Details

  • Plaintiff / Appellee WORSTEN MACK ANDREWS
  • Represented By
    • Brittany Halley Hendrix-Smith
  • Defendant / Appellant MICHAEL KEEFE, individually and in his Official Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Pittsburg
  • Represented By
    • Noah G. Blechman Esquire
    • Amy S. Rothman Esquire
  • Defendant / Appellant CITY OF PITTSBURG, a municipal corporation
  • Represented By
    • Noah G. Blechman Esquire
    • Amy S. Rothman Esquire

Court Documents

#10

(#10) Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SJS) Appellants motion to d...

Fees Apply
#9

(#9) Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Pittsburg and Michael Ke...

Fees Apply
#8

(#8) MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The dial-in assessment conferenc...

Fees Apply
#7

(#7) MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Con...

Fees Apply
#5

(#5) Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Pittsburg and Michael Ke...

Fees Apply
#4

(#4) Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): In addition to a...

Fees Apply
#2

(#2) Filed (ECF) Appellee Worsten Mack Andrews Mediation Que...

Fees Apply
1 #6

Attorneys Not Registered for E-Filing

Fees Apply
1 #5

Case Opening Packet

Fees Apply
1 #4

Mediation Questionnaire

Fees Apply
#1

Docketing Letter

Fees Apply

Docket Entries

  • 09/06/2019
  • (#10) Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SJS) Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ] ) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [11424124] (JPD) [Entered: 09/06/2019 04:39 PM]
  • 08/28/2019
  • (#9) Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Pittsburg and Michael Keefe Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 08/28/2019. [11413950] [19-16399] (Rothman, Amy) [Entered: 08/28/2019 02:48 PM]
  • 08/15/2019
  • (#8) MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The dial-in assessment conference scheduled for 8/16/19 is CANCELED. By 09/30/2019, Appellant to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. See order for details. [11398478] (CL) [Entered: 08/15/2019 12:17 PM]
  • 07/25/2019
  • (#7) MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 08/16/2019, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11377143] (CL) [Entered: 07/25/2019 03:53 PM]
  • 07/22/2019
  • (#6) The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/22/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11372551][19-16399] (AD) [Entered: 07/22/2019 06:44 PM]
  • 07/22/2019
  • (#5) Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Pittsburg and Michael Keefe Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/22/2019. [11371806] [19-16399] (Rothman, Amy) [Entered: 07/22/2019 02:10 PM]
  • 07/22/2019
  • (#4) Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address the basis of this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Maropulos v. Cty. of Los Angeles, 560 F.3d 974, 975 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) ([A]n order denying qualified immunity on the ground that a genuine issue of material fact exists is not a final, immediately appealable order.); Rodriguez v. Cty. of Los Angeles, 891 F.3d 776, 791 (9th Cir. 2018). The briefing schedule established previously remains in effect. [11371802] (RT) [Entered: 07/22/2019 02:09 PM]
  • 07/21/2019
  • (#3) The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/21/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11370587][19-16399] (AD) [Entered: 07/21/2019 06:44 PM]
  • 07/21/2019
  • (#2) Filed (ECF) Appellee Worsten Mack Andrews Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/21/2019. [11370539] [19-16399] (Hendrix-Smith, Brittany) [Entered: 07/21/2019 05:22 PM]
  • 07/16/2019
  • (#1) DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/23/2019. Transcript ordered by 08/15/2019. Transcript due 09/16/2019. Appellants City of Pittsburg and Michael Keefe opening brief due 10/24/2019. Appellee Worsten Mack Andrews answering brief due 11/25/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11365489] (RT) [Entered: 07/16/2019 03:01 PM]

Please submit a removal request if you do not want this court record to appear in search engine results.