This case was last updated from PACER on 01/11/2020 at 06:05:26 (UTC).

Roberto Herrera v. D. Davey

Case Summary

On 11/12/2019 Roberto Herrera filed a Prisoner - Other Prisoner lawsuit against D Davey. This case was filed in U.S. Courts Of Appeals, U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    19-17296

  • Filing Date:

    11/12/2019

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Prisoner - Other Prisoner

  • Court:

    U.S. Courts Of Appeals

  • Courthouse:

    U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

 

Party Details

Petitioner / Appellant

ROBERTO HERRERA

Crescent City, CA 95532-7500

Respondent / Appellee

D. DAVEY

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner / Appellant Attorney

Roberto Herrera

Attorney at PBSP - PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON

P.O. Box 7500

Crescent City, CA 95532-7500

 

Court Documents

#2

(#2) Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIEL A. BRESS) : This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed November 7, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 14-80082. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 19-17296 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [11538467] (RT) [Entered: 12/19/2019 11:46 AM]

#1

(#1) DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 14-80082. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11496581] (RT) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:55 PM]

 

Docket Entries

  • 12/19/2019
  • View Court Documents
  • (#2) Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIEL A. BRESS) : This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed November 7, 2019 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 14-80082. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 19-17296 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [11538467] (RT) [Entered: 12/19/2019 11:46 AM]

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/12/2019
  • View Court Documents
  • (#1) DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 14-80082. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11496581] (RT) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:55 PM]

    Read MoreRead Less

Please submit a removal request if you do not want this court record to appear in search engine results.