21-16002
06/14/2021
Pending - Other Pending
Civil Right - Employment Discrimination
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, NASA, a Federal Agency
PETER ANGELO ALDEN
Fairhaven, MA 02719
Laura Jean Maechtlen Esquire
Attorney at Seyfarth Shaw LLP
560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Alison Elaine Daw
Attorney at DOJ - Office of the U.S. Attorney
150 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 900
San Jose, CA 95113
Neill Tseng
Attorney at DOJ-USAO
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Peter Angelo Alden
12 Fisherman Rd.
Fairhaven, MA 02719
(#5) Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12175034] (AF) [Entered: 07/16/2021 02:48 PM]
(#2) Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By July 14, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect.confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12154389] (AF) [Entered: 06/25/2021 10:09 AM]
Case Opening Packet
Notice to All Parties and Counsel
Docketing Letter and Briefing Schedule
Docket(#5) Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12175034] (AF) [Entered: 07/16/2021 02:48 PM]
Docket(#4) Attorney Alison Elaine Daw in 21-16002 substituted by Attorney Neill Tseng in 21-16002 [12172231] (DJV) [Entered: 07/14/2021 11:18 AM]
Docket(#3) Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Neill T. Tseng (United States Attorney's Office, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055, San Francisco, CA 94102) for Appellee NASA. Substitution for Attorney Alison Elaine Daw for Appellee NASA. Date of service: 07/14/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12172223] [21-16002] (Tseng, Neill) [Entered: 07/14/2021 11:15 AM]
Docket(#2) Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By July 14, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect.confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12154389] (AF) [Entered: 06/25/2021 10:09 AM]
Docket(#1) DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Peter Angelo Alden opening brief due 08/16/2021. Appellees AECOM Technology Corporation and National Aeronautics and Space Administration answering brief due 09/16/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12142938] (RT) [Entered: 06/14/2021 09:52 AM]
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases