Jeffrey Walker v. Guzman, et al
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
22-15868
-
Filing Date:
06/10/2022
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Prisoner - Civil Right
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
Party Details
Plaintiff / Appellant
JEFFREY E. WALKER
San Francisco, CA 94103
Defendant / Appellees
GUZMAN, Officer #2427
OSHA, Officer
FIELDS, Officer
DEERING, Officer
TRACY, Officer
GOMEZ, Officer
HUERRERA, Sgt.
NG, Officer
TAYLOR, Officer
MALASPEINA, Sgt.
GOMEZ, Captain
KEVIN PAULSON, Chief
MIAAMOTO, Sheriff
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff / Appellant Attorney
Jeffrey E. Walker
Attorney at SFCJ - SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY JAIL
425 7Th Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Court Documents
Docketing Letter and Briefing Schedule
Notice to All Parties and Counsel
Case Opening Packet
(#2) Filed Appellant Jeffrey E. Walker motion for TRO/Iinjunction pending appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/18/2022. [12490104] (HH) [Entered: 07/10/2022 02:22 PM]
(#3) Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12492108] (AF) [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:41 PM]
(#4) MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, CMC and DPC) [12508246] (RL) [Entered: 08/03/2022 08:37 AM]
Docket Entries
- 08/03/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#4) MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, CMC and DPC) [12508246] (RL) [Entered: 08/03/2022 08:37 AM]
- 07/12/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#3) Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12492108] (AF) [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:41 PM]
- 07/08/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#2) Filed Appellant Jeffrey E. Walker motion for TRO/Iinjunction pending appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/18/2022. [12490104] (HH) [Entered: 07/10/2022 02:22 PM]
- 06/10/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#1) DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jeffrey E. Walker opening brief due 08/08/2022. [12468329] (ABT) [Entered: 06/10/2022 11:05 AM]
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases