This case was last updated from U.S. Courts Of Appeals on 07/22/2022 at 05:00:33 (UTC).

Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert

Case Summary

On 07/19/2022 Charles TalbertIn re Charles Talbert was filed as an Other - Writ Of Mandamus lawsuit. This case was filed in U.S. Courts Of Appeals, U.S. Court Of Appeals, Third Circuit. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    22-2293

  • Filing Date:

    07/19/2022

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other - Writ Of Mandamus

 

Party Details

Petitioner

In re: CHARLES TALBERT

Camp Hill, PA 17001

Respondents

JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Deputy Secretary for Administration of the DOC

TABB BICKELL, Executive Deputy Secretary for the Institutional Operations of DOC

TAMMY FERGUSON, Deputy Secretary of the DOC for the Eastern Region

KEVIN RANSOM, Superintendent of SCI-Dallas

JASON BOHINSKI, Deputy Superintendent of Centralized Services at SCI-Dallas

MICHAEL GOYNE, Major at SCI-Dallas

SUSAN KUZMINSKI, Business Manager at SCI-Dallas

WILLIAM MIDLICK, Food Services Manager at SCI-Dallas

GISELLE MALET, Mailroom Supervisor at SCI-Dallas

LEA MARTIN, HealthCare Administrator at SCI-Dallas

JACQUELINE CHAKKAN, Registered Nurse at SCI-Dallas

KIMBERLEE DRUM, Advocate for the Office of Mental Health and Healthcare Systems

WELLPATH, a Corporation contracted to provide DOC Inmates professional medical services

JORGE DOMINICIS, Chief Executive Officer of Wellpath

SCOTT PRINCE, Contracted Medical Director at SCI-Dallas

CENTURION MEDICAL, a corporation, contracted to provide DOC inmates with professional mental health services

ERICK WEINSTEIN, Chief Executive Officer of Centurion

ADAM GLUSHAKOW, Certified Registered Nurse employed by Centurion employed by SCI-Camp Hill

19 More Parties Available

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner Attorney

Charles Talbert

Attorney at Camp Hill SCI

P.O. Box 8837, 2500 Lisburn Road

Camp Hill, PA 17001

Respondent Attorneys

Ryan B. Smith Esq.

Attorney at City of Philadelphia

1515 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19102

Nicole J. Boland Esq.

Attorney at Office of Attorney General of Pennsylvania

Strawberry Square, 15Th Floor

Harrisburg, PA 17120

Anthony Bowers Esq.

Attorney at Office of Attorney General of Pennsylvania

Strawberry Square, 15Th Floor

Harrisburg, PA 17120

Allison L. Deibert Esq.

Attorney at Office of Attorney General of Pennsylvania

Strawberry Square, 15Th Floor

Harrisburg, PA 17120

Alexander R. Ferrante Esq.

Attorney at Gold & Ferrante

716 North Bethlehem Pike, Suite 208

Lower Gwynedd, PA 19002

Cassidy L. Neal Esq.

Attorney at Matis Baum & O'Connor

912 Fort Duquesne Boulevard

Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Other Attorneys

Edward F. Beitz Esq.

Attorney at White & Williams

1650 Market Street, One Liberty Place, Suite 1800

Philadelphia, PA 19103

 

Court Documents

#1

Original Proceeding Docketed

1 #2

Case Caption

1 #3

Pro Se Mandamus Docketing Letter

#2

(#2) NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Charles Talbert. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioner's convenience. As required by the affidavit form and statute, the motion must be accompanied by a certified statement of Petitioner's institutional account for the six months prior to this date. It is noted that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioner's fee status in other proceedings. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. This Court does not provide service for litigants, even those who are found to be indigent. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition and motion have been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. See Rules 21 and 25, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit, the certified account statement, and the certificate of service are received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). (JK) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:49 PM]

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/19/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Charles Talbert. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit or remit payment of the $500.00 filing fee. A form affidavit is enclosed for Petitioner's convenience. As required by the affidavit form and statute, the motion must be accompanied by a certified statement of Petitioner's institutional account for the six months prior to this date. It is noted that a petition for writ of mandamus is an original action and a separate motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed, regardless of Petitioner's fee status in other proceedings. If the filing fee is not paid or the motion is not filed, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 107.1. Petitioner must also serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party), and provide a copy of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). In addition, a copy of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be served on each party to the proceeding, to include the District Court judge. This Court does not provide service for litigants, even those who are found to be indigent. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition and motion have been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. See Rules 21 and 25, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until the filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit, the certified account statement, and the certificate of service are received. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(a)(3). (JK) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:49 PM]

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/19/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) Submission titled Petition for Permission to Appeal, treated as Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Notice filed by Petitioner Charles Talbert. (JK) [Entered: 07/19/2022 02:40 PM]

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Centurion Medical is a litigant

Latest cases where Wellpath LLC is a litigant