This case was last updated from U.S. Courts Of Appeals on 07/31/2022 at 09:12:53 (UTC).

David Stebbins v. USDC-CAOAK

Case Summary

On 06/28/2022 David Stebbins filed an Other - Writ Of Mandamus lawsuit against USDC-CAOAK. This case was filed in U.S. Courts Of Appeals, U.S. Court Of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    22-70132

  • Filing Date:

    06/28/2022

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other - Writ Of Mandamus

 

Party Details

Petitioner

DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS

Harrison, AR 72601

Respondent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND

Not Classified By Court

In re: DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS

KARL POLANO

ALPHABET, INC.

DISCORD, INC.

FACEBOOK, INC.

FREDERICK ALLISON, DBA InitiativeKookie

AMAZON.COM, INC.

RAUL MATEAS, DBA TGP482

YOUTUBE, LLC

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner Attorney

David Anthony Stebbins

123 W Ridge Avenue, Apt. D

Harrison, AR 72601

Not Classified By Court Attorneys

Ryan S. Benyamin Esquire

633 West Fifth Street

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Ryan Benyamin

Attorney at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC

633 W 5Th Street, Suite 1550

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Jeffrey G. Landis

Attorney at ZwillGen, PLLC

1900 M Street, Nw, Suite 250

Washington, DC 20036

James Orenstein

Attorney at ZwillGen, PLLC

183 Madison Avenue, Suite 1504

New York, NY 10016

Joseph E. Petersen Esquire

Attorney at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

1080 Marsh Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Sanjay Mohan Nangia

Attorney at Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, CA 94111

 

Court Documents

#1

Docketing Letter and Briefing Schedule

1 #2

Notice to all Parties and Counsel

1 #3

Writ of Mandamus

1 #4

Attorneys Not Registered for E-Filing

#2

(#2) Filed Petitioner Mr. David Anthony Stebbins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/28/2022. [12481757] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:58 AM]

#3

(#3) Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS)Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus or prohibition. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. (COURT UPDATE: To reflect the correct order text; resend nda) [12492305] (WL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:55 PM]

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/12/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#3) Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS)Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus or prohibition. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. (COURT UPDATE: To reflect the correct order text; resend nda) [12492305] (WL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:55 PM]

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#2) Filed Petitioner Mr. David Anthony Stebbins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/28/2022. [12481757] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:58 AM]

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/28/2022
  • View Court Documents
  • Docket(#1) FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PETITIONER. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12481739] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:47 AM]

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where YOUTUBE is a litigant

Latest cases where Amazon.Com, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where Alphabet, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where Discord, Inc. is a litigant