David Stebbins v. USDC-CAOAK
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
22-70132
-
Filing Date:
06/28/2022
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Other - Writ Of Mandamus
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
Party Details
Petitioner
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS
Harrison, AR 72601
Respondent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Not Classified By Court
In re: DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS
KARL POLANO
ALPHABET, INC.
DISCORD, INC.
FACEBOOK, INC.
FREDERICK ALLISON, DBA InitiativeKookie
AMAZON.COM, INC.
RAUL MATEAS, DBA TGP482
YOUTUBE, LLC
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Petitioner Attorney
David Anthony Stebbins
123 W Ridge Avenue, Apt. D
Harrison, AR 72601
Not Classified By Court Attorneys
Ryan S. Benyamin Esquire
633 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Ryan Benyamin
Attorney at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC
633 W 5Th Street, Suite 1550
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Jeffrey G. Landis
Attorney at ZwillGen, PLLC
1900 M Street, Nw, Suite 250
Washington, DC 20036
James Orenstein
Attorney at ZwillGen, PLLC
183 Madison Avenue, Suite 1504
New York, NY 10016
Joseph E. Petersen Esquire
Attorney at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Sanjay Mohan Nangia
Attorney at Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Court Documents
Docketing Letter and Briefing Schedule
Notice to all Parties and Counsel
Writ of Mandamus
Attorneys Not Registered for E-Filing
(#2) Filed Petitioner Mr. David Anthony Stebbins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/28/2022. [12481757] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:58 AM]
(#3) Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS)Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus or prohibition. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. (COURT UPDATE: To reflect the correct order text; resend nda) [12492305] (WL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:55 PM]
Docket Entries
- 07/12/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#3) Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS)Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus or prohibition. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. (COURT UPDATE: To reflect the correct order text; resend nda) [12492305] (WL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:55 PM]
- 06/28/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#2) Filed Petitioner Mr. David Anthony Stebbins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/28/2022. [12481757] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:58 AM]
- 06/28/2022
- View Court Documents
-
Docket(#1) FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PETITIONER. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12481739] (JMR) [Entered: 06/28/2022 10:47 AM]
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases