This case was last updated from San Mateo County Superior Courts on 07/19/2018 at 20:46:09 (UTC).

MULE ZHANG ETAL VS RASA ALANOVNA PETAUSKAITE ETAL

Case Summary

On 06/29/2012 MULE ZHANG ETAL filed a Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle lawsuit against RASA ALANOVNA PETAUSKAITE ETAL. This case was filed in San Mateo County Superior Courts, Southern Branch Hall Of Justice And Records located in San Mateo, California. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *****5061

  • Filing Date:

    06/29/2012

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Dismissed

  • Case Type:

    Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle

  • Court:

    San Mateo County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Southern Branch Hall Of Justice And Records

  • County, State:

    San Mateo, California

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

MULE ZHANG

YAN GAO

YUNQIANG ZHANG

ZHANG, YUNQIANG

ZHANG, MULE

GAO, YAN

Defendants

RASA ALANOVNA PETRAUSKAITE

OLGA PETRAUSKENE

PETRAUSKENE, OLGA

PETRAUSKAITE, RASA ALANOVNA

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

LIM, DEREK D.

 

Court Documents

Conversion Hearing.

CMC NOTICE Comment CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Request for Dismissal of - WITH prejudice in its entirety.

DISMISSAL Comment REQDEA: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FILED AND ENTERED.

Civil Case Cover Sheet.

COVERSHEET Comment CCS: CIVIL CASE COVERSHEET RECEIVED

Summons Issued / Filed.

SUMMONS Comment S30IF: 30 DAY SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED.

Complaint.

COMPLAINT Comment COM: (S) COMPLAINT FILED

 

Docket Entries

  • 09/12/2012
  • Disposition: Judgment; Judgment Type; Dismissal - Other Dismissal; Party; Name: PETRAUSKENE OLGA; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT; Party; Name: PETRAUSKAITE, RASA ALANOVNA; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT; Party; Name: ZHANG, YUNQIANG; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT; Party; Name: GAO, YAN; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT; Party; Name: ZHANG, MULE; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/15/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: CMC NOTICE Comment CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/15/2012
  • Case Management Conference. Additional Info: Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Vacated Comment Dept: 21 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/12/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • Request for Dismissal of - WITH prejudice in its entirety. Additional Info: DISMISSAL Comment REQDEA: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FILED AND ENTERED.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • Cause Of Action. Additional Info: Action Complaint File Date 06/29/2012

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • New Filed Case.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • Civil Case Cover Sheet. Additional Info: COVERSHEET Comment CCS: CIVIL CASE COVERSHEET RECEIVED

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • Summons Issued / Filed. Additional Info: SUMMONS Comment S30IF: 30 DAY SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment *FEE: 120629-0487-CK 166/ 395.00 PAYMT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • Complaint. Additional Info: COMPLAINT Comment COM: (S) COMPLAINT FILED

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • Financial info for ZHANG, MULE : Case Payment Receipt # 201206290487 ZHANG, MULE $395.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • Financial info for ZHANG, MULE : Transaction Assessment $395.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • Financial: ZHANG, MULE; Total Financial Assessment $395.00; Total Payments and Credits $395.00

    Read MoreRead Less

Complaint Information

PLD-PI-001

SHORT TITLE: CASE NUMBER

Zhang, et al. v. Petrauskaite, et al.

4. [_] Piaintiff (name): is doing business under the fictitious name (specify):

and has complied with the fictitious business name laws. 5. Each defendant named above is a natural person

a. [__| except defendant (name): c. [__] except defendant (name): (1) [__] a business organization, form unknown (1) [__] a business organization, form unknown (2) [__] a corporation (2) [__] a corporation (3) [__] an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) [__] an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) [___] a public entity (describe): (4) [_] a public entity (describe): (5) [_] other (specify): (5) [__] other (specify): b. [_] except defendant (name): d. [__] except defendant (name): (1) [[_] a business organization, form unknown (1) [__] abusiness organization, form unknown (2) [___] a corporation (2) [__] acorporation (3) [__] an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) [__1 an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) [___] a public entity (describe): (4) [ ] a public entity (describe): (5) [__] other (specify): (5) [_] other (specify):

[ ] Information about additional defendants who are not natural persons is contained in Attachment 5.

6. The true names of defendants sued as Does are unknown to plaintiff. a. [__] Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): were the agents or employees of other named defendants and acted within the scope of that agency or employment. b. Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): 1to 10 are persons whose capacities are unknown to plaintiff. 7. [ Defendants who are joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 382 are (names):

8. This court is the proper court because

a. [___] atleast one defendant now resides in its jurisdictional area. . ] the principal place of business of a defendant corporation or unincorporated association is in its jurisdictional area. injury to person or damage to personal property occurred in its jurisdictional area.

. ] other (specify):

9. [ Plaintiff is required to comply with a claims statute, and a. [__] has complied with applicable claims statutes, or

b. [_] is excused from complying because (specify):