This case was last updated from San Mateo County Superior Courts on 07/20/2018 at 16:35:53 (UTC).

CHARLES FORD VS MOHAMMED YUSUF

Case Summary

On 01/03/2013 CHARLES FORD filed a Contract - Debt Collection lawsuit against MOHAMMED YUSUF. This case was filed in San Mateo County Superior Courts, Southern Branch Hall Of Justice And Records located in San Mateo, California. The Judges overseeing this case are Dylina, Steven L, Novak, Lisa A, Dylina, Steven L. and Novak, Lisa A.. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *****8843

  • Filing Date:

    01/03/2013

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Dismissed

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Debt Collection

  • County, State:

    San Mateo, California

Judge Details

Judges

Dylina, Steven L

Novak, Lisa A

Dylina, Steven L.

Novak, Lisa A.

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

CHARLES FORD

FORD, CHARLES

Defendants

MOHAMED YUSUF

YUSUF, MOHAMED

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

LARSEN, BRIAN L.

Defendant Attorney

SMITH, CARY S

 

Court Documents

Motion.

NOTICE (2) Comment NM: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING ATTENDANCE AND TESTIMONY AT DEPOSITION FILED BY MOHAMED YUSUF

Document.

FILING (4) Comment FILED: CLERK'S NOTICE OF PRE-ARBITRATION AND SETTING HEARING FILED.

Summons Issued / Filed.

SUMMONS Comment S30IF: 30 DAY SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED.

Conversion Action.

NOTICE (7) Comment NRA: NOTICE OF REJECTION OF ARBITRATOR ARA R. JABAGCHOURIAN FILED BY MOHAMED YUSUF

Complaint.

COMPLAINT Comment COM4: (L) COMPLAINT FILED - PRAYER AMOUNT OVER $10000.00.

Conversion Action.

ARBITRATION (4) Comment NPAP1: NOTICE OF PROPOSED ARBITRATORS PRINTED.

Conversion Action.

STIPULATION (2) Comment PCAH: PARTIES STIPULATE TO CONTINUE ARBITRATION HEARING FROM 02/11/15 TO 03/03/15.

Notice of Assignment of Arbitrator.

NOTICE (6) Comment NAA: NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF ARBITRATOR FILED

Conversion Action.

ARBITRATION Comment NFAA: NOTICE OF FILING OF ARBITRATOR AWARD FILED.

12 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 07/07/2015
  • Disposition: Judgment; Judgment Type; Dismissal - Other Dismissal; Party; Name: YUSUF MOHAMED; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT; Party; Name: FORD, CHARLES; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/15/2015
  • Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: Comment OSC RE: DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT AT THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/15/2015
  • Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. Additional Info: Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Vacated Comment Dept: 21 OSC RE: DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT AT THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/07/2015
  • View Court Documents
  • Request for Dismissal of - WITH prejudice in its entirety. Additional Info: DISMISSAL (8) Comment REQDEA: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FILED AND ENTERED.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/22/2015
  • Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment HV: HEARING VACATED. REASON: MATTER SETTLED AT THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON 06-08-15

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/22/2015
  • Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment PNJT: PRINT NOTICES FOR JURY TRIAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/22/2015
  • View Court Documents
  • Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: HEARING NOTICE Comment JURY TRIAL. TIME ESTIMATE: 5 DAYS 00:00 HOURS.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/22/2015
  • Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment HV: HEARING VACATED. REASON: TRIAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN SET AS A JURY TRIAL - FEES WERE PAID ON 9-04-13

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/22/2015
  • Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: Comment COURT TRIAL (LONG CAUSE). TIME ESTIMATE: 5 DAYS 00:00 HOURS.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/22/2015
  • Jury Trial. Additional Info: Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Vacated Comment Dept: PJ JURY TRIAL. TIME ESTIMATE: 5 DAYS 00:00 HOURS.

    Read MoreRead Less
95 More Docket Entries
  • 03/21/2014
  • Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Case Payment Receipt # 201403210556 YUSUF, MOHAMED $90.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/21/2014
  • Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Transaction Assessment $90.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/04/2013
  • Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Case Payment Receipt # 201309040520 YUSUF, MOHAMED $150.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/04/2013
  • Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Transaction Assessment $150.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/04/2013
  • Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Case Payment Receipt # 201309040516 YUSUF, MOHAMED $370.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/04/2013
  • Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Transaction Assessment $370.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/04/2013
  • Financial: YUSUF, MOHAMED; Total Financial Assessment $630.00; Total Payments and Credits $630.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/03/2013
  • Financial info for FORD, CHARLES : Case Payment Receipt # 201301030305 FORD, CHARLES $370.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/03/2013
  • Financial info for FORD, CHARLES : Transaction Assessment $370.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 01/03/2013
  • Financial: FORD, CHARLES; Total Financial Assessment $370.00; Total Payments and Credits $370.00

    Read MoreRead Less

Complaint Information

ary S. Smith STATE BAR NO. 127854

CARBONE, SMOKE, SMITH,

BENT & LEONARD ATTORNEYSATEO COUNW

1735 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 500 SAN JOSE, CA 95110

(408) 392-8663 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MOHAMMED YUSUF

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

Charles Ford, Case No. CLJ518843 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT V. Mohammed Yusuf and Does 1- 10, Defendants.

COMES NOW defendant Mohammed Yusuf and answers the complaint on file herein as follows:

1. Under the provisions of Section 431.30 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, this answering defendant generally denies each and every allegation of the complaint, and the whole thereof, and further denies that plaintiff has been or is now or will be damaged to the extent alleged or to any other extent.

AS AND FOR FURTHER, SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, ANSWERING DEFENDANT AVERS:

FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

2. The incident or incidents complained of by plaintiff herein were caused, in whole

or in part, by the negligence of the plaintiff. Any recovery by plaintiff in this case must be

reduced by that percentage of the plaintiff's negligence which contributed to the incident or

reduced by that percentage of the plaintiff's negligence which contributed to the incident or incidents.

incidents.

SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

3. Plaintiff failed to use reasonable care to mitigate, in whole or in part, the damages alleged in the complaint.

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

4. Damages complained of by plaintiff herein were caused, in whole or in part, by acts and omissions of persons other than this answering defendant, which other personsnamed as defendants in this action. This answering defendant should only be required to pay that portion of the plaintiff's damages attributable to this answering defendant pursuant to Civil Code sections 1431.2 and/or 1432.

FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

5. The complaint and/or causes of action therein fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against this answering defendant. WHEREFORE, defendant prays: 1. That plaintiff takes nothing; 2. For costs of suit herein; and 3. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DATED: 8/39 /\3 CARBONE, SMOKE, SMITH, BENT & LEONARD

Cary S. Smiifi

Attorneys for Defendant Mohammed Yusuf

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer Larsen, Brian L.