CHARLES FORD VS MOHAMMED YUSUF
Case Summary
On 01/03/2013 CHARLES FORD filed a Contract - Debt Collection lawsuit against MOHAMMED YUSUF. This case was filed in San Mateo County Superior Courts, Southern Branch Hall Of Justice And Records located in San Mateo, California. The Judges overseeing this case are Dylina, Steven L, Novak, Lisa A, Dylina, Steven L. and Novak, Lisa A.. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
*****8843
-
Filing Date:
01/03/2013
-
Case Status:
Disposed - Dismissed
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
San Mateo, California
Judge Details
Judges
Dylina, Steven L
Novak, Lisa A
Dylina, Steven L.
Novak, Lisa A.
Party Details
Plaintiffs
CHARLES FORD
FORD, CHARLES
Defendants
MOHAMED YUSUF
YUSUF, MOHAMED
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
LARSEN, BRIAN L.
Defendant Attorney
SMITH, CARY S
Court Documents
NOTICE (2) Comment NM: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING ATTENDANCE AND TESTIMONY AT DEPOSITION FILED BY MOHAMED YUSUF
FILING (4) Comment FILED: CLERK'S NOTICE OF PRE-ARBITRATION AND SETTING HEARING FILED.
SUMMONS Comment S30IF: 30 DAY SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED.
NOTICE (7) Comment NRA: NOTICE OF REJECTION OF ARBITRATOR ARA R. JABAGCHOURIAN FILED BY MOHAMED YUSUF
COMPLAINT Comment COM4: (L) COMPLAINT FILED - PRAYER AMOUNT OVER $10000.00.
ARBITRATION (4) Comment NPAP1: NOTICE OF PROPOSED ARBITRATORS PRINTED.
STIPULATION (2) Comment PCAH: PARTIES STIPULATE TO CONTINUE ARBITRATION HEARING FROM 02/11/15 TO 03/03/15.
NOTICE (6) Comment NAA: NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF ARBITRATOR FILED
ARBITRATION Comment NFAA: NOTICE OF FILING OF ARBITRATOR AWARD FILED.
Docket Entries
- 07/07/2015
-
Disposition: Judgment; Judgment Type; Dismissal - Other Dismissal; Party; Name: YUSUF MOHAMED; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT; Party; Name: FORD, CHARLES; Comment: 0001 COMPLAINT.
- 09/15/2015
-
Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: Comment OSC RE: DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT AT THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
- 09/15/2015
-
Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. Additional Info: Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Vacated Comment Dept: 21 OSC RE: DISMISSAL AFTER SETTLEMENT AT THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
- 07/07/2015
- View Court Documents
-
Request for Dismissal of - WITH prejudice in its entirety. Additional Info: DISMISSAL (8) Comment REQDEA: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FILED AND ENTERED.
- 06/22/2015
-
Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment HV: HEARING VACATED. REASON: MATTER SETTLED AT THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON 06-08-15
- 06/22/2015
-
Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment PNJT: PRINT NOTICES FOR JURY TRIAL
- 06/22/2015
- View Court Documents
-
Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: HEARING NOTICE Comment JURY TRIAL. TIME ESTIMATE: 5 DAYS 00:00 HOURS.
- 06/22/2015
-
Conversion Minute. Additional Info: Comment HV: HEARING VACATED. REASON: TRIAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN SET AS A JURY TRIAL - FEES WERE PAID ON 9-04-13
- 06/22/2015
-
Conversion Hearing. Additional Info: Comment COURT TRIAL (LONG CAUSE). TIME ESTIMATE: 5 DAYS 00:00 HOURS.
- 06/22/2015
-
Jury Trial. Additional Info: Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Vacated Comment Dept: PJ JURY TRIAL. TIME ESTIMATE: 5 DAYS 00:00 HOURS.
- 03/21/2014
-
Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Case Payment Receipt # 201403210556 YUSUF, MOHAMED $90.00
- 03/21/2014
-
Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Transaction Assessment $90.00
- 09/04/2013
-
Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Case Payment Receipt # 201309040520 YUSUF, MOHAMED $150.00
- 09/04/2013
-
Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Transaction Assessment $150.00
- 09/04/2013
-
Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Case Payment Receipt # 201309040516 YUSUF, MOHAMED $370.00
- 09/04/2013
-
Financial info for YUSUF, MOHAMED : Transaction Assessment $370.00
- 09/04/2013
-
Financial: YUSUF, MOHAMED; Total Financial Assessment $630.00; Total Payments and Credits $630.00
- 01/03/2013
-
Financial info for FORD, CHARLES : Case Payment Receipt # 201301030305 FORD, CHARLES $370.00
- 01/03/2013
-
Financial info for FORD, CHARLES : Transaction Assessment $370.00
- 01/03/2013
-
Financial: FORD, CHARLES; Total Financial Assessment $370.00; Total Payments and Credits $370.00
Complaint Information
ary S. Smith STATE BAR NO. 127854
CARBONE, SMOKE, SMITH,
BENT & LEONARD ATTORNEYSATEO COUNW
1735 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 500 SAN JOSE, CA 95110
(408) 392-8663 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MOHAMMED YUSUF
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
LIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
Charles Ford, Case No. CLJ518843 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT V. Mohammed Yusuf and Does 1- 10, Defendants.
COMES NOW defendant Mohammed Yusuf and answers the complaint on file herein as follows:
1. Under the provisions of Section 431.30 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, this answering defendant generally denies each and every allegation of the complaint, and the whole thereof, and further denies that plaintiff has been or is now or will be damaged to the extent alleged or to any other extent.
AS AND FOR FURTHER, SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, ANSWERING DEFENDANT AVERS:
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
2. The incident or incidents complained of by plaintiff herein were caused, in whole
or in part, by the negligence of the plaintiff. Any recovery by plaintiff in this case must be
reduced by that percentage of the plaintiff's negligence which contributed to the incident or
reduced by that percentage of the plaintiff's negligence which contributed to the incident or incidents.
incidents.
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
3. Plaintiff failed to use reasonable care to mitigate, in whole or in part, the damages alleged in the complaint.
THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
4. Damages complained of by plaintiff herein were caused, in whole or in part, by acts and omissions of persons other than this answering defendant, which other personsnamed as defendants in this action. This answering defendant should only be required to pay that portion of the plaintiff's damages attributable to this answering defendant pursuant to Civil Code sections 1431.2 and/or 1432.
FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
5. The complaint and/or causes of action therein fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against this answering defendant. WHEREFORE, defendant prays: 1. That plaintiff takes nothing; 2. For costs of suit herein; and 3. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. DATED: 8/39 /\3 CARBONE, SMOKE, SMITH, BENT & LEONARD
Cary S. Smiifi
Attorneys for Defendant Mohammed Yusuf
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases