SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE VS. RICHARD ANTOGNINI
Case Summary
On 07/28/2020 SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE filed a Contract - Professional Negligence lawsuit against RICHARD ANTOGNINI. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts, Civic Center Courthouse located in San Francisco, California. The Judge overseeing this case is GARRETT L. WONG. The case status is Not Classified By Court.
Case Details
-
Case Number:
*******5617
-
Filing Date:
07/28/2020
-
Case Status:
Not Classified By Court
-
Case Type:
Contract - Professional Negligence
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
San Francisco, California
Judge Details
Judge
GARRETT L. WONG
Party Details
Plaintiff
SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
Defendant
ANTOGNINI, RICHARD
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
SULLIVAN, KEVIN MICHAEL
1839 Ygnacio Valley Road #420
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Court Documents
COMPLAINT
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE, COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO DEFENDANT ANTOGNINI, RICHARD SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR DEC-30-2020 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON SEP-28-2020 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON DEC-07-2020
Notice to Plaintiff
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF
Docket Entries
- 12/30/2020
-
HearingMatter(s): CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Location: CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE ROOM 610; Judge Name: GARRETT L. WONG
- 07/28/2020
- View Court Documents
-
DocketNOTICE TO PLAINTIFF
- 07/28/2020
-
FinancialPayment : CIVIL COMPLAINT/PETITION/OTHER FIRST PAPER; Amount : $450; Payment Type : CHECK ; Receipt Number : W1320728F004
- 07/28/2020
- View Court Documents
-
DocketPROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE, COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP AS TO DEFENDANT ANTOGNINI, RICHARD SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR DEC-30-2020 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON SEP-28-2020 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON DEC-07-2020 (Fee:$450.00)
Tentative Rulings
| Case Number: | *******5617 | |
| Case Title: | SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE VS. RICHARD ANTOGNINI | |
| Court Date: | FEB-28-2022 09:00 AM | |
| Calendar Matter: | Notice Of Motion To Compel | |
| Rulings: | Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Monday, February 28, 2022, Line 3, PLAINTIFF SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE's Motion To Compel.Continued to March 17, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. on the court's motion.Pursuant to the instructions on the department's court website (https: sfsuperiorcourt.org/divisions/civil/law-motion), parties are reminded if they have not done so already to please email electronic courtesy copies of their discovery motion papers to Discovery302@sftc.org. The subject line of the email should state the case name and number and the date of the continued hearing. =(302/JPT) |
| Case Number: | *******5617 | |
| Case Title: | SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE VS. RICHARD ANTOGNINI | |
| Court Date: | MAR-17-2022 09:00 AM | |
| Calendar Matter: | Notice Of Motion To Compel | |
| Rulings: | Matter on the Discovery Calendar for Thursday, March 17, 2022, Line 3, PLAINTIFF SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE's Motion To Compel.Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling:Motion is granted. Request for sanctions is granted in the amount of $1910.20 against Defendant Richard Antognini in the amount of $1,910.20. Unopposed. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPT 301 @ 9:00AM), or dial the corresponding phone number.Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If parties have arranged for a court reporter to appear, please include the following in your email: (1) ensure that they are California Certified Shorthand Reporters; (2) the reporter's full contact information [name, CSR number, personal work email, and phone number]. If the reporter is not a California Certified Shorthand Reporter, the transcript cannot be certified for use in California courts. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. =(302/JPT) |
| Case Number: | *******5617 | |
| Case Title: | SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE VS. RICHARD ANTOGNINI | |
| Court Date: | MAY-12-2022 09:00 AM | |
| Calendar Matter: | Motion To Compel The Production Of Docs | |
| Rulings: | Discovery Calendar for Thursday, May 12, 2022, Line 4, PLAINTIFF SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE's Motion To Compel The Production Of Docs:Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling:Parties to Appear. The parties are reminded that, as instructed on the department's court website(https: sfsuperiorcourt.org/divisions/civil/law-motion), parties are reminded to please submit electronic courtesy copies of their discovery motion papers as attachments to an email sent to Discovery302@sftc.org. The subject line of the email should state the case name and number and the date of the continued hearing. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 301 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Department 301. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If parties have arranged for a court reporter to appear, please include the following in your email: the reporter's full contact information [name, CSR number, personal work email, and phone number]. If the reporter is not a California Certified Shorthand Reporter, the transcript cannot be certified for use in California courts. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. =(302/JPT) |
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases
Latest cases where Spielbauer Law Office is a litigant
Latest cases represented by Lawyer SULLIVAN, KEVIN M.
Case Type:
Contract - Professional Negligence
Case Category:
Civil
Description:
Cases involving professional negligence (legal, medical, etc.) that did not result in personal injury
SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE VS. RICHARD ANTOGNINI