This case was last updated from San Francisco County Superior Courts on 04/11/2016 at 21:20:54 (UTC).

MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION et al VS. RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION et al

Case Summary

On 06/29/2012 MT TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION filed a Contract - Professional Negligence lawsuit against RONALD P GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts , Civic Center Courthouse located in San Francisco, California. The case status is Not Classified By Court.

Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *******1973

  • Filing Date:

    06/29/2012

  • Case Status:

    Not Classified By Court

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Professional Negligence

  • Court:

    San Francisco County Superior Courts

  • Courthouse:

    Civic Center Courthouse

  • County, State:

    San Francisco, California

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs and Appellants

MEIER, KAROL JAN

MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION

SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI

Defendants and Respondents

DOES 1 TO 20 INCLUSIVE

GOLDMAN, RONALD

RONALD P GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL

RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

RONALD P. GOLDMAN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

Other

WOLF, LAURENCE E.

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff and Appellant Attorney

BRADSHAW, DREXEL A.

Attorney at BRADSHAW & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

One Sansome, 34Th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

FRASSETTO, PAUL A

Attorney at FRASSETTO LAW OFFICES

505 Montgomery Street, 10Th Flr.

San Francisco, CA 94111

SHAUGHNESSY, GREGORY ROBERT

Attorney at THE LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY R SHAUGHNESSY

55 Main Street

Tiburon, CA 94920

GOOD, ROBERT V.

Attorney at THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

55 Main Street

Tiburon, CA 94920

Other Attorney

GOLDMAN, RONALD PAUL

Attorney at THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRMMERCHANT BANK BUILDING

55 Main Street

Tiburon, CA 94920

 

Court Documents

GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)

POS OF SEP STMT OF FACTS, DEC OF JACK V. VALINOTI, DEC OF SANDI SELIG-FARNEY, DEC OF KAROL JAN MEIER, MEMO OF PTS AND AUTH AND RESPONSE TO DEF'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS ISO OPPOS TO DEFS' MTN FOR SUMM JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMM ADJUDICATION FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI

GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)

POS OF: REPLY ISO DEF'S MTN FOR SUMM JUDGMENT; REPLY TO PLTFS' RESPONSE TO DEF'S SEP STATEMENT OF FACTS; RESPONSE TO PLTF'S SEP STMT OF FACTS IN OPPOS TO DEF'S MTN FOR SUMM JUDGMENT; SUPPLEMENTAL DEC OF GREGORY SHAUGHNESSY; SUPPLEMENTAL DEC OF RONALD P. GOLDMAN; OBJECTIONS TO THE DEC OF SANDI SELIG FARNEY AND KAROL JAN MEIER; [PROPOSED] ORDER FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

ORDER

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO RESET THE HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)

AMENDED INDEX OF EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO THE DECLARATIONNS SUBMITTED BY PLTFS IN SUPPORT OF PLTF'S SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOS TO DEFTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI

GENERIC CIVIL FILING (NO FEE)

POS OF: REPLY MEMO OF P&A ISO MTN FOR SUMM JUDGMENT AND/OR SUMM ADJUDICATION; OBJECTIONS; RESPONSE; SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY; DEC FRASSETTO FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

ORDER

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Order Setting Case Management Conference

REMOVED FROM MASTER JURY CALENDAR ON FEB-24-2014. CASE IS ASSIGNED TO CASE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 610 ON MAR-12-2014 AT 10:30 AM FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR STATUS OF FILING A JUDGMENT. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WAS FILED ON 2/10/14. NOTICE SENT BY COURT. (206)

Order Continuing Case Management Conference

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OF MAR-12-2014 CONTINUED TO MAY-14-2014 AT 10:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 610 FOR DEFENDANT(S) TO FILE JUDGMENT FOLLOWING ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI TAKE NOTHING FROM DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT

PROOF OF SERVICE OF MOTION

PROOF OF SERVICE OF MOTION DEMURRER FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

DECLARATION OF

DECLARATION OF S. CLINTON WOODS IN SUPPORT OF PLTFS' OPPOS TO DEF'S MTN TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI

ORDER

ORDER DENYING MOTION OF DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DBA THE GOLDMAN LAW FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO PLAINTIFFS' 1ST & 4TH CAUSES OF ACTION

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ISO PLTFS' MTN FOR A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO CA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 657 FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT A JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED ON APRIL 16, 2014

Order That Hearing is Off Calendar

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OF MAY-14-2014 IS OFF CALENDAR, JUDGMENT ON FILE. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.

NOTICE OF DEFAULT ON APPEAL SENT TO APPELLANT

NOTICE OF DEFAULT ON APPEAL SENT TO APPELLANT

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING AMENDED JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI TAKE NOTHING FROM DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION ON THE COMPLAINT, SAID DEFENDANT TO HAVE JUDGMENT THEREON FOR $7,276.90 COSTS, TOTAL JUDGMENT $7,276.90, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT

120 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 01/27/2016
  • View Court Documents
  • RETURN OF EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO MARIN COUNTY, RETURNED AND FILED, FULLY SATISFIED AS TO PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/19/2015
  • EXECUTION FOR MONEY ISSUED TO MARIN COUNTY AS TO PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION (Fee:25.00)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/04/2015
  • View Court Documents
  • THE COURT ORDERED THE FOLLOWING AMENDED JUDGMENT ENTERED: IT IS ADJUDGED THAT PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI TAKE NOTHING FROM DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION ON THE COMPLAINT, SAID DEFENDANT TO HAVE JUDGMENT THEREON FOR $7,276.90 COSTS, TOTAL JUDGMENT $7,276.90, SEE SCANNED DOCUMENT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/21/2015
  • View Court Documents
  • MEMORANDUM OF COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, $419.00 TOTAL COSTS, MATURE DATE OCT-12-2015,, (TRANSACTION ID # 15263068) FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/14/2015
  • View Court Documents
  • REMITTITUR AFFIRMED (A141939 DIV. 3)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/03/2014
  • REFUND/REIMBURSEMENT OF $100.00 RE 32766 FOR TRANSACTION W2814714A002 (REPORTERS COSTS DEPOSITED), PAYABLE TO BRADSHAW & ASSOC, DOC #1906398502, WARRANT #38203517, DATED NOV-03-2014

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/03/2014
  • REFUND/REIMBURSEMENT OF $100.00 RE 32766 FOR TRANSACTION W2814714A002 (REPORTERS COSTS DEPOSITED), PAYABLE TO CSR VAUGHN, DOC #1906398458, WARRANT #38203524, DATED NOV-03-2014

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/21/2014
  • View Court Documents
  • CERTIFICATION NOTICE

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/21/2014
  • APPEAL RECORD CERTIFIED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL - 8.124, 4 VOLS RT (APPEAL FILED 5/19/14, A141939 DIV 3)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/15/2014
  • View Court Documents
  • DIRECTORY NOTICE TO REPORTER - SANDY CARRANZA

    Read MoreRead Less
365 More Docket Entries
  • 08/13/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/27/2012
  • COURT REPORTING SERVICES LESS THAN 1 HOUR FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL (Fee:30.00)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/27/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/27/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/27/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • PROOF OF SERVICE OF MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/27/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE FILED BY DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL HEARING SET FOR AUG-27-2012 AT 09:30 AM IN DEPT 302 (Fee:900.00)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI SERVED JUN-29-2012, PERSONAL SERVICE ON DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/02/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI SERVED JUN-29-2012, PERSONAL SERVICE ON DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2012
  • View Court Documents
  • PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE, COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION MEIER, KAROL JAN SELIG-FARNEY, SANDI AS TO DEFENDANT RONALD P. GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS THE GOLDMAN LAW FIRM GOLDMAN, RONALD AN INDIVIDUAL DOES 1 TO 20 INCLUSIVE SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR NOV-28-2012 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON AUG-28-2012 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON NOV-13-2012 (Fee:410.00)

    Read MoreRead Less

Complaint Information

Paul A. Frassetto (Bar No. 114802) Frassetto Law Offices

505 Montgomery St., 10" Floor $&h Francisco County Superior Court San Francisco, CA 94111 ' Telephone: (415) 354-2700 MAY 14 2014

Email: paulfrassetto@yahoo.com

| | | CLEBK OF,THE COURT Att(gé)rneys foét Defendant RONALD P. GOLDMAN, Bv = e

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

MT TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CASE NO. CGC-12-521973 CORPORATION, KAROL JAN MEIER, and - S ANDI SELIG FARNEY )(posed] ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

| COMPLAINT

V. DATE: May 14, 2014 RONALD P, GOLDMAN, A PROFESSIONAL | TIME: 9:30 a.m. LAW CORPORATION, et al. DEPT: 302

Defendants.

The motion of Piamtlfis MT. TAM LASER AND SKIN CARE CORPORATION,

KAROL JAN MEIER and SANDI-SELIG-FARNEY for a leave to file a first amended | complamt came on for hearing in Department 302 of the above-entitled Court on May 14, 20]J|4 The Court, having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the |

morlon, having issued its tentative ruling to deny the motion, and the Court having heard

the|oral argument of counsel, rules as follows:

O 0 ~J & W A~ W N

:/‘\& | f/‘—\

The motion is denied. Judgment was entered on April 16, 2014, and the Court lacks

the é@luthority to grant leave to amend because the judgment has not been vacated. See