*******6587
12/03/2012
Not Classified By Court
Contract - Debt Collection
San Francisco, California
MARLA J. MILLER
ERNEST H. GOLDSMITH
CYNTHIA M. LEE
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
HOANG, BINH
DOES 1 TO 5, INCLUSIVE
HOANG, BINH THANH
San Francisco, CA 94122
BLEIER, ELIZABETH A
Attorney at BLEIER & COX LLP
16130 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 620
Encino, CA 914362568
TRAN, JIM
Attorney at COAST LAW CENTER
5 Park Plaza, Ste 650
Irvine, CA 92614
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. ESTIMATED TIME FOR TRIAL: 2.0 HOURS
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, $812.00 TOTAL COSTS, MATURE DATE JUN-25-2013, FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
GENERAL DENIAL FILED BY DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH THANH (Fee:225.00)
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY: TRAN, JIM SUBSTITUTED FOR PRO PER AS ATTORNEY FOR HOANG, BINH THANH
EXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740), COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. AS TO DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH DOES 1 TO 5, INCLUSIVE SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON JUN-03-2013 (Fee:225.00)
SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT, PROOF OF SERVICE ONLY, FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. SERVED DEC-19-2012, SUBSTITUTE SERVICE ON NATURAL PERSON ON DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR JUL-24-2013 AT 10:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 610. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. ESTIMATED TIME FOR TRIAL: 2.0 HOURS
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE OF JUL-24-2013 CONTINUED TO OCT-02-2013 AT 10:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 610. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.
DocketSATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT, FULLY SATISFIED, (TRANSACTION ID # 100025582) FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. AS TO DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH THANH
DocketLAW AND MOTION, 302, RULING: THE COURT ADOPTED THE TENTATIVE RULING WHICH WAS NOT CONTESTED. DEFENDANT BINH HOANG'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 473(B) IS DENIED. THE MANDATORY RELIEF PROVISIONS OF CCP 473 DO NOT APPLY TO DEFENDANT BECAUSE DEFENDANT IS SEEKING RELIEF FROM AN ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ENTERED THEREON. SEE ENGLISH V. IKON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., (2001) 94 CAL. APP. 4TH 130, 138; PRIETO V. LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIV. (2005) 132 CAL.APP.4TH 290, 297; LAS VEGAS LAND AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC V. WILKIE WAY, LLC (2013) 219 CAL.APP.4TH 1086. "A SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS NEITHER A 'DEFAULT,' NOR A 'DEFAULT JUDGMENT,' NOR A 'DISMISSAL' WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 473(B)." ENGLISH V. IKON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., SUPRA, 94 CAL. APP. 4TH AT 133. DEFENDANT'S MOTION APPEARS TO BE BASED SOLELY ON THE MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF CCP 473. IN THE LAST SENTENCE OF ITS REPLY BRIEF, DEFENDANT STATES THAT EVEN IF THE MANDATORY PROVISION IS NOT APPLICABLE, "DISCRETIONARY RELIEF IS STILL AVAILABLE TO DEFENDANT." REPLY BR. AT 3. HOWEVER, DEFENDANT FAILS TO ESTABLISH ANY FACTUAL BASIS FOR RELIEF UNDER THE DISCRETIONARY PORTIONS OF CCP 473. ORDER SIGNED. JUDGE: MARLA J. MILLER; CLERK: GINA GONZALES; REPORTER: SHERRY SAWYER CSR# 5976.
DocketORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
DocketMINI MINUTES FOR MAY-01-2014 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302
HearingMatter(s): MOTION FOR SET ASIDE\/VACATE JUDGMENT Off Calendar May-01-2014 Denied MINI MINUTES: No appearance. RULING: The Court adopted the tentative ruling which was not contested. DEFENDANT BINH HOANG'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 473(b) is denied. The mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 do not apply to defendant because defendant is seeking relief from an order granting summary judgment and judgment entered thereon. See English v. IKON Business Solutions, Inc., (2001) 94 Cal. App. 4th 130, 138; Prieto v. Loyola Marymount Univ. (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 290, 297; Las Vegas Land and Development Company, LLC v. Wilkie Way, LLC (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1086. "A summary judgment is neither a 'default,' nor a 'default judgment,' nor a 'dismissal' within the meaning of section 473(b)." English v. IKON Business Solutions, Inc., supra, 94 Cal. App. 4th at 133. Defendant's motion appears to be based solely on the mandatory provisions of CCP 473. In the last sentence of its reply brief, Defendant states that even if the mandatory provision is not applicable, "discretionary relief is still available to Defendant." Reply Br. at 3. However, Defendant fails to establish any factual basis for relief under the discretionary portions of CCP 473. ORDER SIGNED. Judge: Marla J. Miller; Clerk: Gina Gonzales; Reporter: Sherry Sawyer CSR# 5976.; Location: CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE ROOM 302; Judge Name: MARLA J. MILLER
DocketNOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
DocketLAW AND MOTION 302, DEFENDANT BINH HOANG'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT IS CONTINUED TO MAY 1, 2014 AT 9:30 AM IN DEPT. 302, TO GIVE THE OPPOSING PARTY A CHANCE TO COMPLY WITH SAN FRANCISCO LOCAL RULE 2.6B. THE OPPOSING PARTY SHALL IMMEDIATELY PROVIDE A COURTESY COPY OF THE OPPOSITION WITH A COVER LETTER REFLECTING THE NEW HEARING DATE. JUDGE: ERNEST H. GOLDSMITH, CLERK: LESLEY FISCELLA, NOT REPORTED. (302)
DocketMINI MINUTES FOR APR-01-2014 09:30 AM FOR DEPT 302
DocketSUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY: TRAN, JIM SUBSTITUTED FOR PRO PER AS ATTORNEY FOR HOANG, BINH THANH
HearingMatter(s): MOTION FOR SET ASIDE\/VACATE JUDGMENT Off Calendar Apr-01-2014 Continued To May-01-14 At 09:30 A.M. In Dept 302 MINI MINUTES: No appearance on this matter. RULING: The Court adopted its tentative ruling. DEFENDANT BINH HOANG'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE\/VACATE JUDGMENT is continued to May 1, 2014, to give the opposing party a chance to comply with San Francisco Local Rule 2.6B. The opposing party shall immediately provide a courtesy copy of the opposition with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. Judge: Ernest H. Goldsmith, Clerk: Lesley Fiscella, Not reported.; Location: CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE ROOM 302; Judge Name: ERNEST H. GOLDSMITH
DocketDECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
DocketMEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
DocketMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. HEARING SET FOR SEP-09-2013 AT 09:30 AM IN DEPT 302 (Fee:$500.00)
DocketCASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR JUL-24-2013 AT 10:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 610. NOTICE SENT BY COURT.
FinancialPayment : FIRST PAPER RESPONSE/PLEADING $2,500 - $10,000; Amount : $225; Payment Type : CASH ; Receipt Number : R1613118F027
DocketGENERAL DENIAL FILED BY DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH THANH (Fee:$225.00)
DocketSUMMONS ON COMPLAINT, PROOF OF SERVICE ONLY, FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. SERVED DEC-19-2012, SUBSTITUTE SERVICE ON NATURAL PERSON AS TO DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH
FinancialPayment : COMPLAINT/PETITION/FIRST PAPER; Amount : $225; Payment Type : CHECK ; Receipt Number : W1012C04F011
DocketEXEMPT COLLECTIONS (RULE 3.740), COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. AS TO DEFENDANT HOANG, BINH DOES 1 TO 5, INCLUSIVE SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON JUN-03-2013 (Fee:$225.00)
Case Number: | *******6587 | |
Case Title: | CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS. BINH HOANG et al | |
Court Date: | APR-01-2014 09:30 AM | |
Calendar Matter: | MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT | |
Rulings: | Set for hearing on Tuesday, April 1, 2014, line 9. DEFENDANT BINH HOANG'S MOTION FOR SET ASIDE/VACATE JUDGMENT. Continued to May 1, 2014, to give the opposing party a chance to comply with San Francisco Local Rule 2.6B. The opposing party shall immediately provide a courtesy copy of the opposition with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. =(302/EHG) |
Case Number: | *******6587 | |
Case Title: | CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS. BINH HOANG et al | |
Court Date: | SEP-09-2013 09:30 AM | |
Calendar Matter: | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | |
Rulings: | Matter on Calendar for Monday, September 9, 2013, Line 15, PLAINTIFF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Granted. No opposition was filed. The Court will sign the proposed order and judgment submitted with the moving papers. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order with the name and address of the prevailing party's counsel or the prevailing party if pro per in the top left of the first page of proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must bring the proposed order to the hearing or email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the motion is not opposed or the tentative ruling is not contested. =(302/MJM) |
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases