AUBREY BANDA VS. EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
*******8536
-
Filing Date:
08/20/2019
-
Case Status:
Not Classified By Court
-
Case Type:
Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
San Francisco, California
Judge Details
Judge
GARRETT L. WONG
Party Details
Plaintiff
BANDA, AUBREY
Defendants
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO
DOES 1 TO 25
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
GEERHART, CHARLES OWEN
Attorney at PAOLI & GEERHART, LLP
150 Post St. Ste. 600
San Francisco, CA 94108
Court Documents
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF
Docket Entries
- 08/20/2019
-
Payment : CIVIL COMPLAINT/PETITION/OTHER FIRST PAPER; Amount : $450; Payment Type : CHECK ; Receipt Number : W0919820F019
- 08/20/2019
- View Court Documents
-
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF
- 08/20/2019
-
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED, COMPLAINT FILED BY PLAINTIFF BANDA, AUBREY AS TO DEFENDANT EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DOES 1 TO 25 SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR JAN-22-2020 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON OCT-21-2019 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON DEC-30-2019 (Fee:$450.00)
Tentative Rulings
| Case Number: | *******8536 | |
| Case Title: | AUBREY BANDA VS. EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | |
| Court Date: | SEP-18-2020 09:00 AM | |
| Calendar Matter: | Defendant'S Motion To Compel The Mental Examination Of Plaintiff | |
| Rulings: | Matter on calendar for Friday, September 18, 2020, Line 4, 1-Defendant'S Motion To Compel The Mental Examination Of Plaintiff:Pro Tem Judge James Fleming, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling: The motion is unopposed and will be granted. Defendant shall submit a proposed order in Word format to jameshfleming@gmail.com. As a result of the COVID-19 emergency, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPT 301 @ 9:00AM), or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to jameshfleming@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If parties have arranged for a court reporter to appear, please include the following in your email: (1) ensure that they are California Certified Shorthand Reporters; (2) the reporter's full contact information [name, CSR number, personal work email, and phone number]. If the reporter is not a California Certified Shorthand Reporter, the transcript cannot be certified for use in California courts. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. =(302/JPT) |
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases