2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS'' ASSOCIATION, A VS. ALLANA, BUICK & BERS INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
*******0360
-
Filing Date:
03/12/2021
-
Case Status:
Not Classified By Court
-
Case Type:
Other
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
San Francisco, California
Judge Details
Judge
SAMUEL K. FENG
Party Details
Plaintiff
2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION
Defendants
RICHARD AVELAR & ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE
ALLANA, BUICK & BERS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
SCHOECH, MATTHEW R
Attorney at SCHOECH LAW GROUP
3511 Del Paso Road, Suite 160, Pmb 227
Sacramento, CA 95835
Court Documents
OTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS, COMPLAINT (TRANSACTION ID # 66419937) FILED BY PLAINTIFF 2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION AS TO DEFENDANT ALLANA, BUICK & BERS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RICHARD AVELAR & ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE NO SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET NOT FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR AUG-11-2021 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON MAY-11-2021 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON JUL-19-2021
CIVIL CASE COVERSHEET FILED (TRANSACTION ID # 66419937) FILED BY PLAINTIFF 2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION
NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF
Docket Entries
- 08/11/2021
-
HearingMatter(s): CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Location: CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE ROOM 610; Judge Name: SAMUEL K. FENG
- 03/23/2021
-
FinancialPayment : CIVIL COMPLAINT/PETITION/OTHER FIRST PAPER; Amount : $450; Payment Type : ELECTRONIC ; Receipt Number : H2521323F004
- 03/12/2021
- View Court Documents
-
DocketNOTICE TO PLAINTIFF
- 03/12/2021
- View Court Documents
-
DocketCIVIL CASE COVERSHEET FILED (TRANSACTION ID # 66419937) FILED BY PLAINTIFF 2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION
- 03/12/2021
- View Court Documents
-
DocketOTHER NON EXEMPT COMPLAINTS, COMPLAINT (TRANSACTION ID # 66419937) FILED BY PLAINTIFF 2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC NONPROFIT CORPORATION AS TO DEFENDANT ALLANA, BUICK & BERS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION RICHARD AVELAR & ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE NO SUMMONS ISSUED, JUDICIAL COUNCIL CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET NOT FILED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR AUG-11-2021 PROOF OF SERVICE DUE ON MAY-11-2021 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT DUE ON JUL-19-2021 (Fee:$450.00)
Tentative Rulings
| Case Number: | *******0360 | |
| Case Title: | 2200-2204 MARKET STREET OWNERS'' ASSOCIATION, A VS. ALLANA, BUICK & BERS INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL | |
| Court Date: | MAR-24-2022 09:00 AM | |
| Calendar Matter: | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Request For Admissions, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, And Form Interrogatories, Set One To Plaintiff 2200-2204 Market Street Owner | |
| Rulings: | Matter on calendar for Thursday, March 24, 2022, Line 6, DEFENDANT RICHARD AVELAR & ASSOCIATES Motion To Compel Further Responses To Request For Admissions, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, And Form Interrogatories, Set One To Plaintiff 2200-2204 Market Street Owner.Pro Tem Judge William Lynn, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given by email. If not all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the Pro Tem Judge will hold a hearing on the motion and, based on the papers submitted by the parties and the hearing, issue a report in the nature of a recommendation to the Dept. 302 Judge, who will then decide the motion. If a party does not appear at the hearing, the party will be deemed to have stipulated that the motion will be decided by the Pro Tem Judge with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. The Pro Tem Judge has issued the following tentative ruling:Parties to appear. Neither party provided a courtesy copy as required by Local Rule 2.7. For the 9:00a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPT 301 @ 9:00AM), or dial the corresponding phone number.Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to williamclynn@gmail.com with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. If parties have arranged for a court reporter to appear, please include the following in your email: (1) ensure that they are California Certified Shorthand Reporters; (2) the reporter's full contact information [name, CSR number, personal work email, and phone number]. If the reporter is not a California Certified Shorthand Reporter, the transcript cannot be certified for use in California courts. If the tentative ruling is not contested, the parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Pro Tem hearing the motion and the Pro Tem will sign an order confirming the tentative ruling. The prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order repeating verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must e-mail it to the Judge Pro Tem. =(302/RBU). |
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases