This case was last updated from Santa Clara County Superior Courts on 06/06/2022 at 22:10:37 (UTC).

Mendoza v. Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc.

Case Summary

On 06/13/2018 Mendoza filed a Labor - Other Labor lawsuit against Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc. This case was filed in Santa Clara County Superior Courts, Downtown Superior Court located in Santa Clara, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Walsh, Brian C. The case status is Disposed - Other Disposed.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ******9544

  • Filing Date:

    06/13/2018

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Other Disposed

  • Case Type:

    Labor - Other Labor

  • County, State:

    Santa Clara, California

Judge Details

Judge

Walsh, Brian C

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

Christina Mendoza

Defendant

Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc.

Not Classified By Court

Superior Court of California

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

Lee, Larry W

Larry W Lee

Defendant Attorneys

Falcone, Elizabeth A

Elizabeth A Falcone

Not Classified By Court Attorney

Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara

 

Court Documents

Order: Deeming Case Complex

6/13/2018 Order: Deeming Case Complex

Civil Lawsuit Notice

6/13/2018 Civil Lawsuit Notice

Summons: Issued/Filed

6/13/2018 Summons: Issued/Filed

Civil Case Cover Sheet

6/13/2018 Civil Case Cover Sheet

Proof of Service: Summons DLR (Civil)

6/27/2018 Proof of Service: Summons DLR (Civil)

Answer (Unlimited) (Fee Applies)

7/18/2018 Answer (Unlimited) (Fee Applies)

Notice

7/30/2018 Notice

Complaint: Amended

8/14/2018 Complaint: Amended

Statement: Case Management Conference

10/19/2018 Statement: Case Management Conference

Declaration

6/17/2020 Declaration

Declaration

6/17/2020 Declaration

Motion: Order

6/17/2020 Motion: Order

Order

7/10/2020 Order

Minute Order

7/10/2020 Minute Order

Notice

9/1/2020 Notice

Declaration

4/8/2021 Declaration

Minute Order

4/22/2021 Minute Order

Judgment

4/23/2021 Judgment

58 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 04/23/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Judgment; Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: AMENDED JUDGMENT - signed/SRK.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/22/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • HearingDescription: Conference: Case Management; Department: Department 1; Time: 2:30PM; Result: Held

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/22/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Minute Order

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/08/2021
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Declaration; Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: HRG 4/16/21 - DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH KRUCKENBERG ON BEHALF OF SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR WITH RESPECT TO DISBURSEMENT OF SETTLEMENT FUNDS

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 09/01/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Notice; Comment: Compliance Hearing reset from 4/16/21 to 4/22/21

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/10/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • HearingDescription: Motion: Final Fairness Hearing; Department: Department 1; Time: 9:00AM; Result: Heard: Granted

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/10/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Minute Order

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/10/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Order; Comment: Order After Hearing on 7/10/20 and Judgment - signed/BCW

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Motion: Order; Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: HRG 7/10/20 - MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/17/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Declaration; Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: HRG 7/10/20 - DECLARATION OF LARRY W. LEE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

    Read MoreRead Less
35 More Docket Entries
  • 10/19/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Statement: Case Management Conference; Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: HRG 10/26/18 - Joint Case Management Conference Statement

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 08/14/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Complaint: Amended; Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: First Amended Complaint

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/30/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Notice; Comment: CMC reset from 10/5/18 to 10/26/18

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 07/18/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Answer (Unlimited) (Fee Applies); Filed By: Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc.,; Comment: Notice of Appearance

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/27/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Proof of Service: Summons DLR (Civil); Filed By: Christina Mendoza,; Comment: Proof of Service of Summons

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • DocketDescription: New Filed Case

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Civil Case Cover Sheet; Comment: COMPLEX

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Summons: Issued/Filed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Civil Lawsuit Notice; Comment: 1st CMC set for 10/5/18 at 10am in D1; assigned to Hon. Brian C. Walsh

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/13/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketDescription: Order: Deeming Case Complex; Comment: Order Deeming Case Complex and Staying Discovery and Responsive Pleading Deadline signed/BCW

    Read MoreRead Less

Complaint Information

18CV 329544

Santa Clara - Civil

) | Electronically Filed Elizabeth A. Falcone, CA Bar No. 219084 by Superior Court of CA,

elizabeth.falcone@ogletree.com

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, p.ccounty of Santa Clara, 222 SW Columbia Street, Suite 1500 Reviewed By: R. Walker Portland, OR 97201 Case #18CV329544 Telephone: 503.552.2140 Envelope: 2197317 Facsimile ;: 503.552.2100

Attorney for Defendant

PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

CHRISTINA MENDOZA, on behalf of herself | Case No. 18CV329544 and all other similarly situated employees, , Honorable Brian C. Walsh

Plaintiff, Department 1

DEFENDANT PLANNED PARENTHOOD

VS. MAR MONTE, INC.’S ANSWER TO

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED CLASS

PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, ACTION COMPLAINT

INC., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive

Defendants. Action Filed: June 13, 2018 Trial Date: Not set

TO PLAINTIFF CHRISTINA MENDOZA, AND TO HER ATTORNEYS OF

RECORD: Defendant PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. (“Defendant”) hereby

answers Plaintiff CHRISTINA MENDOZA’S (“Plaintiff”’) purported First Amended Class Action

Complaint (the “Complaint™) as follows:

GENERAL DENIAL

The Complaint is not verified. Thus, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 431.30(d), Defendant denies generally each and all of the allegations in the Complaint, including, but not limited to, the allegations that the putative class members whom Plaintiff

purports to represent and/or Plaintiff herself is entitled to any of the relief requested in thepage 1 can't be parsed

page 2 can't be parsed

page 3 can't be parsed

FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

(De Minimis)

15. Plaintiffs’ purported claims set forth in the Complaint are or may be barred on the grounds that any such violations were de minimis, and ignoring the de minimis violation of the law, Defendant complied with its obligation under the California Labor Code and/or wage and hour laws.

SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

(Set-Off and Recoupment)

16. Should Plaintiffs prevail on one or more of the purported claims set forth in the Complaint against Defendant, the award is barred, in whole or in part, because Defendant is entitled to a set-éff against any amounts awarded to Plaintiff and/or the members of the putative class (the existence of which is expressly disputed) equal to the amounts Defendant has already paid Plaintiff and/or the putative class members, and Defendant reserves the right to assert a claim for recoupment in the event of overpayment.

SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

(Consent)

17. The claims alleged in the Complaint are barred, in whole or in part, because Plaintiff and the putative class members consented to and/or acquiesced in the alleged conduct by Defendant of which Plaintiffs now complain.

i EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Estoppel)

18. To the extent Plaintiff and/or the members of the putative class (the existence of which is expressly disputed) failed to accurately report their hours worked, their claims are barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Each of the purported claims set forth in the Complaint is also barred, in whole or in part, by the doctrine of estoppel in that, inter alia, Plaintiff and/or the members of the putative class (the existence of which is expressly disputed) through their actions and representations led Defendant to believe that they were properly paid and received all wages to

which they were legally entitled.

5page 5 can't be parsed

page 6 can't be parsed

page 7 can't be parsed

page 8 can't be parsed

page 9 can't be parsed

DATED: November 21, 2018 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.

BY: 2(4( a - jfl Elizabeth &\. Falcone

Attorneys for Defendant PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC.

e

11page 11 can't be parsed

page 12 can't be parsed

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where Superior Court of California is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer LEE, LARRY W