Smith v. Olympia Healthcare, LLC et al.

HearingDescription: Record on appeal filed.

HearingDescription: Response filed:; Notes: Appellant's response to this court's notice sent April 14, 2022

DocketDescription: Letter sent to:; Notes: The civil case information statement for the (U) appeal filed February 25, 2022 was received and filed on April 4, 2022. However, the order attached to the civil case information statement is not a final judgment entered after an order granting summary judgment and is therefore nonappealable. (Code Civ. Proc., 437c, subd. (m)(1); Levy v. Skywalker Sound (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 753, 761, fn. 7; Stolz v. Wong Communications Limited Partnership (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1811, 1816.) Please provide the court with an appealable judgment within 15 days of the date of this notice with proof of service on opposing party(ies). (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.25(a)(1)-(2).) If no final judgment has been entered, then you are requested to demonstrate in writing why the appeal should not be dismissed as having been taken from a nonappealable order. Failure to provide an appealable judgment or file a response within the time provided may result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice. (Sherman v. Standard Mines Co. (1913) 166 Cal. 524, 525.) (U)

DocketDescription: Association of attorneys filed for:; Notes: David Sohn of Cole Pedroza is associated in as counsel of record for respondent Christos Kalatzis, M.D.

DocketDescription: Filing fee.; Notes: $775 filing fee paid. (U)

DocketDescription: Civil case information statement filed.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Nailah Smith Attorney: Suzanne Elizabeth Rand-Lewis (R1)

DocketDescription: Civil case information statement filed.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Nailah Smith Attorney: Suzanne Elizabeth Rand-Lewis (U)

DocketBrief: Civil case information statement filed.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Appellant: Nailah SmithAttorney: Suzanne Elizabeth Rand-Lewis; Notes: (R1)

DocketBrief: Civil case information statement filed.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Appellant: Nailah SmithAttorney: Suzanne Elizabeth Rand-Lewis; Notes: (U)

DocketDescription: Default notice sent; no case information statement filed, or statement incomplete.; Notes: Appellant (February 25, 2022 by Nailah Smith (U) ) is in default for failure to file a Case Information Statement pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.100(g).

DocketDescription: Filing fee.; Notes: Civil filing fee paid by Timothy Rand-Lewis.

DocketDescription: Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).; Notes: No fee received (R1)

DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Appeal filed on February 25, 2022 by Nailah Smith (R1)

DocketDescription: Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).; Notes: No fee received (U)

DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Appeal filed on February 25, 2022 by Nailah Smith(U)

DocketTrial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court; County: Los Angeles; Trial Court Case Number: BC712013; Trial Court Judge: Ford III, Harry