Simonyans v. Torbati

HearingDescription: Record on appeal filed.

DocketDescription: Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on:; Notes: Notice dated Aug. 26, 2021: 8.122 w. RT

DocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: On August 31, 2021, the clerk received and filed appellant Rita Simonyans's response to the clerk's August 20, 2021 notice requesting Simonyans to provide the final, appealable judgment entered after the order granting summary judgment. In her response, Simonyans indicates that no final judgment has been entered in this case but that the order granting summary judgment ended the litigation and effectively resulted in a dismissal of the case. The determination of whether there exists sufficient finality in the appealed order granting summary judgment is deferred to the panel in the division that will hear the appeal. The clerk's August 20, 2021 notice is hereby discharged.

DocketDescription: Response filed:; Notes: Appellant's response to Court's August 20, 2021 notice

DocketDescription: Letter sent to:; Notes: The civil case information statement for the appeal filed July 2, 2021 was received and filed on August 16, 2021. However, the order attached to the civil case information statement is not a final judgment entered after an order granting summary judgment and is therefore nonappealable. (Code Civ. Proc., 437c, subd. (m)(1); Levy v. Skywalker Sound (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 753, 761, fn. 7; Stolz v. Wong Communications Limited Partnership (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 1811, 1816.) Please provide the court with an appealable judgment within 15 days of the date of this notice with proof of service on opposing party(ies). (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.25(a)(1)-(2).) If no final judgment has been entered, then you are requested to demonstrate in writing why the appeal should not be dismissed as having been taken from a nonappealable order. Failure to provide an appealable judgment or file a response within the time provided may result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice. (Sherman v. Standard Mines Co. (1913) 166 Cal. 524, 525.)

DocketDescription: Association of attorneys filed for:; Notes: Association of counsel within firm. Bradley Charles Clark of Schmid & Voiles associates Denise H Greer of Schmid & Voiles as attorney of record for respondent.

DocketDescription: Civil case information statement filed.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Rita Simonyans Attorney: Louis F. Teran

DocketBrief: Civil case information statement filed.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Appellant: Rita SimonyansAttorney: Louis F. Teran

DocketDescription: Case information statement returned for correction.; Notes: Civil case information statement submitted on August 12, 2021 returned for failure to attach the appealed order. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.100(g)(1).)

DocketDescription: Filing fee.; Notes: Appellant's filing fee paid via credit card.

DocketDescription: Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).; Notes: No fee received

DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Appeal filed on July 2, 2021 by Rita Simonyans

DocketTrial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court; County: Los Angeles; Trial Court Case Number: 19STCV46544; Trial Court Judge: Moreton, Jr., Edward