This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 06/16/2022 at 14:11:52 (UTC).

Serrano v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Case Summary

On 05/12/2022 Serrano filed an Other lawsuit against Superior Court of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, Second Appellate District - Division 4 located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Meyer, Judith. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ***0257

  • Filing Date:

    05/12/2022

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • County, State:

    Statewide, California

Judge Details

Trial Court Judge

Meyer, Judith

 

Party Details

Petitioner

Onofre Serrano

Los Angeles, CA 90086

Respondent

Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Interested Party

The People

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Respondent Attorney

Hon. Judith Meyer

Governor George Deukmejian - Long Beach 275 Magnolia, Dept. S20

Long Beach, CA 90802

Interested Party Attorneys

Office of the Attorney General

300 South Spring St. 1St Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90013

Office of the District Attorney

320 W. Temple St. #540

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 05/19/2022
  • DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate filed on May 12, 2022 has been read and considered and is denied. The petition was filed beyond the 60-day deadline for nonstatutory writs without an adequate justification and is otherwise inadequate for review. (See Nixon Peabody LLP v. Superior Court (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 818, 822; Chapman v. Superior Court (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 261, 271; see also California Rules of Court, rules 8.485(b)(1)(A) & (b)(3)(B).) *

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/19/2022
  • DocketDescription: Case complete.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/19/2022
  • DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate filed on May 12, 2022 has been read and considered and is denied. The petition was filed beyond the 60-day deadline for nonstatutory writs without an adequate justification and is otherwise inadequate for review. (See Nixon Peabody LLP v. Superior Court (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 818, 822; Chapman v. Superior Court (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 261, 271; see also California Rules of Court, rules 8.485(b)(1)(A) & (b)(3)(B).) *

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/12/2022
  • DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate.

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a litigant

Latest cases where People is a litigant