***7661
01/19/2022
Pending - Other Pending
Other
Statewide, California
Stern, Michael
Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Janaina Pontes Silva Monteiro
Isabela Do Nascimento Fonseca Galvao
Rodrigo Ferreira
Stephen E. Ronk
Attorney at Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
633 W. 5Th Street, 52Nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tim A. Goetz
Attorney at Attorney at Law
2901 Airport Drive
Torrance, CA 90505
Candice S. Nam
Attorney at Gordon & Rees LLP
633 W 5Th St Fl 52
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2086
Cathrine E. Tauscher
Attorney at Robinson Helicopter Company
2901 Airport Drive
Torrance, CA 90505
Hon. Michael Stern
Attorney at Dept. 62
Los Angeles Superior Court 111 N. Hill St., Dept. 1
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Frederick Bennett
Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County
111 North Hill Street, Room 546
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Elizabeth L. Crooke
Attorney at Engstrom Lipscomb & Lack
10100 Santa Monica Blvd. 16Th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4107
Kathryn Maher Infante
1111 Alexandria Dr
San Diego, CA 92107
Walter John Lack
Attorney at Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack
10100 Santa Monica Blvd. 12Th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4107
Michael Pendlebury Lewis
Attorney at Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack
10100 Santa Monica Blvd Fl 12
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4113
Steven C. Marks
Attorney at Podhurst Orseck Josefsburg Eaton
25 W. Flagler Street Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130-1780
Court documents are not available for this case.
DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final The petition for writ of mandate filed on January 19, 2022, has been read and considered, along with the preliminary opposition and reply. The petition is denied because petitioner fails to demonstrate a prima facie case that the trial court abused its discretion. (Martinez v. Ford Motor Co. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 9, 18.)
DocketDescription: Case complete.
DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: The petition for writ of mandate filed on January 19, 2022, has been read and considered, along with the preliminary opposition and reply. The petition is denied because petitioner fails to demonstrate a prima facie case that the trial court abused its discretion. (Martinez v. Ford Motor Co. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 9, 18.)
DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.; Notes: Proof of Service for Petitioner Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.'s Reply to Preliminary Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate
DocketDescription: Reply filed to:; Notes: Petitioner Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.'s Reply to Preliminary Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate
DocketDescription: Default notice for responsive filing fee sent to:; Notes: RPIs Monteiro, et al.
DocketDescription: Telephone conversation with:; Notes: Elizabeth Crooke, counsel for RPI, re incorrect email address on file
DocketDescription: Opposition filed.; Notes: Preliminary opposition to petition for writ of mandate, filed by RPIs Monteiro, et al. via letter from Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack dated January 31, 2022
DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.; Notes: Petition for writ of mandate
DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.; Notes: Petition for writ of mandate
DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Civil Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief (Stay Requested) Vol 5 of 5
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Civil Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief (Stay Requested) Vol 4 of 5
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Civil Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief (Stay Requested) Vol 3 of 5
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Civil Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief (Stay Requested) Vol 2 of 5
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Civil Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief (Stay Requested) Vol 1 of 5
DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Civil Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Appropriate Relief (Stay Requested)
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases