PERRY v. S.C. (NP PARC CHATEAUX)
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
***8057
-
Filing Date:
04/12/2021
-
Case Status:
Disposed - Other Disposed
-
Case Type:
Other
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Statewide, California
Party Details
Petitioner
Michael (Moshe) Perry
West Hills, CA 91307
Respondent
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Interested Parties
Appellate Division of the Superior Courts
NP Parc Chateaux, LLC
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Respondent Attorney
Frederick Bennett
Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County
111 North Hill Street, Room 546
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Interested Party Attorney
Tania Kim Cardoso
Attorney at Hollenbeck & Cardoso, LLP
7755 Center Avenue, Suite 1100
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.
Docket Entries
- 05/26/2021
-
DispositionDescription: Petition for review denied
- 05/26/2021
-
DocketDescription: Petition for review denied
- 04/19/2021
-
DocketDescription: Received:; Notes: Third document entitled amended petitioner's motion pursuant to CRC, rule 3.515. Michael (Moshe) Perry, Petitioner Pro Per
- 04/19/2021
-
DocketDescription: Received:; Notes: Second document entitled amended petitioner's motion pursuant to CRC, rule 3.515. Michael (Moshe) Perry, Petitioner Pro Per
- 04/19/2021
-
DocketDescription: Received:; Notes: Document entitled amended petitioner's motion pursuant to CRC, rule 3.515. Michael (Moshe) Perry, Petitioner Pro Per
- 04/19/2021
-
DocketDescription: Received:; Notes: Document entitled Petitioner's motion pursuant to CRC, rule 3.515. Michael (Moshe) Perry, Petitioner Pro Per
- 04/15/2021
-
DocketDescription: Received Court of Appeal record
- 04/13/2021
-
DocketDescription: Forma Pauperis application granted
- 04/13/2021
-
DocketDescription: Record requested; Notes: Court of Appeal record imported and available electronically.
- 04/12/2021
-
DocketDescription: Forma pauperis application filed
- 04/12/2021
-
DocketDescription: Petition for review filed; Notes: Petitioner: Michael (Moshe) Perry Pro Per
- 04/06/2021
-
DocketDescription: Letter sent to:; Notes: Dear Mr. Perry: The court has considered your application to file an overlength petition for review which we received electronically on April 6, 2021. Your application to file an overlength petition has been denied. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.504 (d).) With the court's permission, you must resubmit a new petition for review not exceeding the 8,400 words on or before April 12, 2021. In addition, you must also submit the filing fee for a petition for review which is $710 or submit a properly completed FW -001 form with information that demonstrates that you are eligible for a fee waiver. You have Ten (10) days from the date of this notice to pay your fees and costs, or submit your fee waiver, failure to do so may result in the court striking the filing of your petition for review.
- 04/06/2021
-
DocketDescription: Application to file over-length brief denied; Notes: Michael (Moshe) Perry, Petitioner Pro Per
- 04/06/2021
-
DocketDescription: Application to file over-length brief filed; Notes: Michael (Moshe) Perry, Petitioner Pro Per
- 04/06/2021
-
DocketDescription: Received oversized petition for review; Notes: Petitioner: Michael (Moshe) Perry Pro Per
- 03/30/2021
-
DocketCourt of Appeal District/Division: Second Appellate District , Div. 8; Court of Appeal Case Number: B311362; Disposition: Petition summarily denied by order; Trial Court: Los Angeles County Superior Court; Trial Court Case Number: 20CHUD00033
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases