In re TRAVIS O FOSTER on Habeas Corpus

DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final THE COURT: * The petition for writ of mandate filed on February 6, 2023, has been read and considered. It is denied for failure to produce an adequate record or a declaration explaining the exigent circumstances why the record is not available. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.486(b).) In addition, to the extent petitioner seeks resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.6, he has already sought the same relief in prior petitions. (See Hagan v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 767, 770-771 [a court may refuse to consider repetitive applications of the same petition].) To the extent he seeks relief under legislative changes last year, his notice of appeal provides an adequate remedy at law.

DocketDescription: Case complete.

DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: THE COURT: * The petition for writ of mandate filed on February 6, 2023, has been read and considered. It is denied for failure to produce an adequate record or a declaration explaining the exigent circumstances why the record is not available. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.486(b).) In addition, to the extent petitioner seeks resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.6, he has already sought the same relief in prior petitions. (See Hagan v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 767, 770-771 [a court may refuse to consider repetitive applications of the same petition].) To the extent he seeks relief under legislative changes last year, his notice of appeal provides an adequate remedy at law.

DocketDescription: Petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed.