Huh v. Superior Court Los Angeles County et al.

DispositionDescription: Order dismissing petition; Disposition Type: Final The petitions for writ of mandate filed on December 23, 2021 and April 7, 2022 are consolidated for consideration on the court's own motion. The pro hac vice motions in case B319547 are granted. The petition in case B319547 is denied for failure to state entitlement to extraordinary relief. The petition in case B317203 is dismissed as moot.

DocketDescription: Case complete.

DocketDescription: Dismissal order filed.; Notes: The petitions for writ of mandate filed on December 23, 2021 and April 7, 2022 are consolidated for consideration on the court's own motion. The pro hac vice motions in case B319547 are granted. The petition in case B319547 is denied for failure to state entitlement to extraordinary relief. The petition in case B317203 is dismissed as moot.

DocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: THE COURT:* The court is in receipt of the parties' letters regarding the March 23, 2022 denial of petitioner's motion to quash after consideration of real parties' evidence. If petitioner would like to challenge that order, he should do so by filing a timely new petition supported by exhibits. (Code Civ. Proc., 418.10, subd. (c); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.486(b).) The pending petition in this case will remain on file and may be consolidated for review with any new petition.

DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Letter from Counsel for RPI San Diego County Office of Education, along with copy of Notice of Ruling

DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Kellogg Hansen, etc. dated March 25, 2022 re: After further briefing, the trial court heard argument on March 23. At that hearing, the court adopted its tentative order "adding rationale" to its earlier order based on "new evidence" and again denied Dr. Huh's motion to quash.

DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Baron Budd, PC dated March 24, 2022 re: Real Parties in Interest, Grossmont Union High School and San Diego County Office of Education (collectively referred to as "Public Entity Plaintiffs"), submit this letter to inform the Court as to the recent hearing concerning the motion that is the subject of the Writ Petition before this Court.

DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Exhibit K to Declaration of David L. Schwarz in Support of Reply IN Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate

DocketDescription: Filed document entitled:; Notes: Declaration of David L. Schwarz in Support of Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate

DocketDescription: Reply filed to:; Notes: Petitioner's Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate

DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick dated January 28, 2022 Re: respond to the Public Entity Plaintiffs' letter of January 27, 2022, and to respectfully request that the Court decline their invitation to defer consideration of Dr. Huh's petition for a writ of mandate

DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Baron Budd dated January 27, 2022 re: inform the Court of a significant development that occurred in the Superior Court yesterday that directly impacts the order that is the subject of the Writ Petition now before this Court. Real Parties believe that this development will likely mean that the Court should defer consideration of this writ petition until the conclusion of presently contemplated proceedings in the trial court.

DocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs and Real Parties in Interest Grossmont Union High School District and San Diego County Office of Education, shall have an extension of time to fourteen (14) days, up to and including January 28, 2022, within which to file their Plaintiffs' Preliminary Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate. Petitioner's reply is now due February 4, 2022.

DocketDescription: Requested - extension of time; Notes: to ext opposition to 2/11/22

DocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate filed on December 23, 2021 has been read and considered. Real parties are invited to file a preliminary opposition by January 14, 2022. Petitioner may reply by January 21, 2022. The stay request is denied as unnecessary. (Code Civ. Proc., 418.10, subd. (c).) The motions for pro hac vice admission of Mark C. Hansen and Michael J. Guzman are granted.

DocketDescription: Email sent to:; Notes: Notice providing all parties correct division.

DocketDescription: pro hac vice application; Notes: Application for pro hac vice(Michael J. Guzman)

DocketDescription: pro hac vice application; Notes: Application for pro hac vice(Mark C. Hansen)

DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: One volume of exhibits.

DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate with a STAY.