Hooman Automotive Group et al. v. Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro, LLP

HearingDescription: Respondent's brief.

DocketDescription: Granted - extension of time.; Notes: Respondent's brief. Due on 10/20/2023 By 45 Day(s)

DocketDescription: Requested - extension of time; Notes: Respondent's brief. Requested for 10/20/2023 By 45 Day(s)

DocketDescription: Association of attorneys filed for:; Notes: Additional handling attorney for respondent Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro (Daniel Reback from Nemecek & Cole, APC)

DocketDescription: Stipulation of extension of time filed to:; Notes: Respondent's brief. Due on 09/05/2023 By 60 Day(s) RBF +60

DocketDescription: Appellant's appendix filed.; Notes: APPELLANTS' APPENDIX [VOLUME 2 OF 2 - PAGES 244 - 466] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS

DocketDescription: Appellant's appendix filed.; Notes: APPELLANTS' APPENDIX [VOLUME 1 OF 2 - PAGES 1 - 243] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS

DocketDescription: Filed document entitled:; Notes: Notice of change of firm name for counsel for appellants TO THE COURT AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that ESNER, CHANG & BOYER, counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants Hooman Automotive Group, Hooman Nissani, HK Automotive Group, Inc., RHC Automotive, Inc., and RHH Automotive, Inc., has changed its name to ESNER, CHANG, BOYER & MURPHY.

DocketDescription: Appellant's opening brief.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Hooman Automotive Group Attorney: Stuart B. Esner

DocketBrief: Respondent's brief.; Due Date: 10/20/2023; Party Attorney: Defendant and Respondent: Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro, LLPAttorney: Claudia L. Stone

DocketDescription: Requested - extension of time

DocketDescription: Stipulation of extension of time filed to:; Notes: AOB +30

DocketDescription: Reporter's transcript filed.; Notes: ONE: reporter (R-1).

DocketDescription: Notice per rule 8.124 - with reporter's transcript.; Notes: Notice dated Sept. 29, 2022

DocketDescription: Filing fee.; Notes: Check #7839 for $775 from lasc.

DocketDescription: Returned document for non-conformance.; Notes: Substitution of attorney submitted on September 8, 2022 rejected due to former legal representative for plaintiff/appellant does not match what we have on file. (submitted 5 duplicate forms, all rejected)

DocketDescription: Civil case information statement filed.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Hooman Automotive Group Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: Hooman Nissani Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: HK Automotive Group, Inc. Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: RHC Automotive, Inc. Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: RHH Automotive, Inc. Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner

DocketBrief: Civil case information statement filed.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Appellant: Hooman Automotive GroupAttorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: Hooman NissaniAttorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: HK Automotive Group, Inc.Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: RHC Automotive, Inc.Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner Plaintiff and Appellant: RHH Automotive, Inc.Attorney: Elizabeth Leigh Bradley Attorney: Stuart B. Esner

DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Appeal filed on July 25, 2022 by Hooman Automotive Group.

DocketTrial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court; County: Los Angeles; Trial Court Case Number: 21STCV45057; Trial Court Judge: Fahey, William