Harris v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
***3302
-
Filing Date:
06/28/2021
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Other
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Statewide, California
Judge Details
Trial Court Judge
Sahagun, Raul
Party Details
Petitioner
Jade D. Harris
Respondent
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Interested Party
The People
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Petitioner Attorneys
Robin Francine Bernstein-Lev
Attorney at Los Angeles County Public Defenders Office
320 West Temple Street Room 590, Appellate Branch
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Ricardo Daniel Garcia
Attorney at Los Angeles County Public Defender
210 W Temple St Fl 19
Los Angeles, CA 90012-3231
Albert J. Menaster
Attorney at Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office
210 West Temple St
Los Angeles, CA 90012-3266
Lisa Anne Roth
Attorney at Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office
320 West Temple Street Suite 590
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Thomas Stephen Moore
Attorney at Office of the Public Defender
320 West Temple St., Room 590
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Respondent Attorney
Hon. Raul Anthony Sahagun
Norwalk Courthouse, Department D 12720 Norwalk Blvd
Norwalk, CA 90650
Interested Party Attorneys
Office of the Attorney General
300 South Spring St. 1St Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Office of the District Attorney
320 W. Temple St. #540
Los Angeles, CA 90012
John Edward McKinney
Attorney at Los Angeles County Distirct Attorney
211 W Temple St Ste 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.
Docket Entries
- 07/01/2021
-
DocketDescription: Supreme Court order filed re:; Notes: The petition for review and application for stay are denied. [S269619]
- 06/30/2021
-
DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final
- 06/30/2021
-
DocketDescription: Case complete.
- 06/30/2021
-
DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate filed on June 28, 2021 has been read and considered, and is denied for failure to demonstrate entitlement to the relief requested. (See Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1266, 1273.)
- 06/28/2021
-
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Volume 1 of 1.
- 06/28/2021
-
DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate with a STAY. (CAPITAL CASE)
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases