This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 11/26/2021 at 14:12:51 (UTC).

Farzad et al. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al.

Case Summary

On 12/14/2020 Farzad filed an Other lawsuit against Superior Court of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, Second Appellate District - Division 1 located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Karlan, Craig. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ***9355

  • Filing Date:

    12/14/2020

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • County, State:

    Statewide, California

Judge Details

Trial Court Judge

Karlan, Craig

 

Party Details

Petitioners

Nasrin Farzad

Elite Pros, Inc.

Farbod Farzad

Behrouz Farzad

Respondents

Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Hon. Craig D. Karlan

Santa Monica, CA 90401

Interested Parties

Rahimi & CO.

Siamak Michael Rahimi

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner Attorneys

Desmond J. Hinds

Attorney at Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

11601 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 800

Los Angeles, CA 90025-1744

Linda L Streeter

Attorney at Hinshaw & Culberson, LLP

11601 Wilshire Blvd. #800

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Farzad Tabatabai

Attorney at Tabatabai & Miyamoto, APC

11111 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 1700

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Richard T Miyamoto

Attorney at Tabatabai & Miyamoto, APC

11111 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 1700

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Respondent Attorney

Frederick Bennett

Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County

111 North Hill Street, Room 546

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Interested Party Attorneys

Michael W. Vivoli

Attorney at Vivoli & Saccuzzo LLP

3104 Fourth Avenue

San Diego, CA 92103

Jason Paul Saccuzzo

Attorney at Vivoli & Saccuzzo, LLP

3104 Fourth Avenue

San Diego, CA 92103

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 03/26/2021
  • DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final The petition for writ of mandate, filed December 14, 2020, has been read and considered. The petition is denied.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/26/2021
  • DocketDescription: Case complete.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 03/26/2021
  • DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: The petition for writ of mandate, filed December 14, 2020, has been read and considered. The petition is denied.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/14/2020
  • DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Volumes 1-3; Record in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/14/2020
  • DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Joint Petition for Writ of Mandate or Other Extraordinary Relief.

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Elite Pros, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where Rahimi & CO. is a litigant

Latest cases where Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer SACCUZZO JASON