This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 07/26/2022 at 01:05:50 (UTC).

Equinox Holdings, Inc. v. Superior Court for the County of Alameda

Case Summary

On 06/29/2022 Equinox Holdings, Inc filed an Other lawsuit against Superior Court for the County of Alameda. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, First Appellate District - Division 5 located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Herbert, Paul. The case status is Disposed - Other Disposed.
Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ***5511

  • Filing Date:

    06/29/2022

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Other Disposed

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • County, State:

    Statewide, California

Judge Details

Trial Court Judge

Herbert, Paul

 

Party Details

Petitioner

Equinox Holdings, Inc.

Respondent

Superior Court for the County of Alameda

Interested Parties

Renee Porter

Joshua Tolin

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner Attorneys

Thomas G Mackey

Attorney at Jackson Lewis LLP

725 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2500

Los Angeles, CA 90017-5408

Mia Farber

Attorney at Jackson Lewis P.C.

725 South Figueroa Street Suite 2500

Los Angeles, CA 90017-5408

Dylan B. Carp

Attorney at Jackson Lewis P.C.

50 California Street, 9Th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111

Veronica T. Hunter

Attorney at Jackson Lewis P.C.

717 Texas Avenue, Suite 1700

Houston, TX 77002-2743

Interested Party Attorneys

Ronald Wael Makarem

Attorney at Makarem & Associates

11601 Wilshire Blvd #2400

Los Angeles, CA 90025-1760

Samuel D. Almon

Attorney at Makarem & Associates APLC

11601 Wilshire Blvd. #2440

Los Angeles, CA 90025-1760

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/29/2022
  • DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final BY THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate/prohibition and accompanying stay request are denied. Beyond the record accompanying the petition being incomplete (Sherwood v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 183, 186-187; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.486(b)(1)), the court is not persuaded that petitioner has met its burden of demonstrating an entitlement to writ review/relief. * Before Jackson, P.J., Burns, J. and Wiseman, J. (Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Case complete.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: BY THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate/prohibition and accompanying stay request are denied. Beyond the record accompanying the petition being incomplete (Sherwood v. Superior Court (1979) 24 Cal.3d 183, 186-187; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.486(b)(1)), the court is not persuaded that petitioner has met its burden of demonstrating an entitlement to writ review/relief. * Before Jackson, P.J., Burns, J. and Wiseman, J. (Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: Petitioner's application under Rule 8.208(d)(2) is granted.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Received:; Notes: Proposed order on application under Rule 8.208(d)2)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Filing fee.; Notes: Paid via TrueFiling by Jackson Lewis, attorneys for petitioner Equinox

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Application filed to:; Notes: Application to file certificate of interested entities under seal; from Jackson Lewis, attorneys for petitioner Equinox

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Filed document entitled:; Notes: Petitioner's appendix, one volume, pages 1-166

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/29/2022
  • DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate, or prohibition, or other appropriate relief

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where EQUINOX HOLDINGS INC. is a litigant

Latest cases where Superior Court for the County of Alameda is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer ALMON SAMUEL D.

Latest cases represented by Lawyer MAKAREM RONALD WAEL