***5093
09/17/2021
Pending - Other Pending
Other
Statewide, California
Sanchez-Gordon, Teresa
Rodnei Dasilvalopez
Superior Court Los Angeles County
Melinda Lou Minkus
Danielle Marie Boyd
Attorney at MACDONALD & CODY, LLP
38 Executive Park Ste 280
Irvine, CA 92614
Michael John Cody
Attorney at MACDONALD & CODY, LLP
38 Executive Park Ste 280
Irvine, CA 92614-4747
Denetta Evelyn-Juanita Scott
Attorney at MACDONALD & CODY, LLP
38 Executive Park Ste 280
Irvine, CA 92614
Frederick Bennett
Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County
111 North Hill Street, Room 546
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Hon. Teresa Sanchez-Gordon
Attorney at Dept. 31
Los Angeles Superior Court 312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
John J. Glugoski
Attorney at Righetti Glugoski, P.C.
220 Halleck St Ste 220
San Francisco, CA 94129
Court documents are not available for this case.
DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Superior Court enclosing trial court's minute order issued in response to the Court of Appeal's alternative writ order
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Alternative writ or OSC issued.; Notes: TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY: You are commanded, immediately upon receipt of this writ, either to:(a) vacate your order of August 4, 2021 in Los Angeles County Superior Court case number 21STCV18117, and thereafter make a new and different order sustaining the demurrer with leave to amend or, (b) in the alternative, SHOW CAUSE before this court, in its courtroom at 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California when the matter is ordered on calendar, why you have not done so and why a peremptory writ of mandate requiring you to do so should not issue. If the respondent intends to comply with alternative (a) above, before doing so it "must give the . . . parties notice and an opportunity to be heard," as required by the Supreme Court in Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1233, 1250-1251, fn. 10. Petitioner shall inform this court, on or before November 9, 2021, whether the respondent has complied with alternative (a), and shall serve and file any new order issued by the respondent. If the respondent complies with alternative (a) above, this court will promptly discharge the alternative writ and dismiss the petition as moot. In the event the respondent court fails to comply with alternative (a) above, a written return to this writ shall be served and filed on or before November 30, 2021. Petitioner may file a reply to the written return, within 20 days after the filing of the return.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Real Party in Interest's motion to augment record (deemed exhibits in support of opposition)
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Informal response filed by:; Notes: Real Party in Interest: Melinda Lou Minkus Attorney: John J. Glugoski
[-] Read LessDocketBrief: Informal response filed by:; Party Attorney: Real Party in Interest: Melinda Lou MinkusAttorney: John J. Glugoski
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: The petition for writ of mandate filed on September 17, 2021 has been read and considered. The real party in interest is requested to serve and file opposition on or before October 8, 2021.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Volume 1 of 1.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate.
[-] Read LessDig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases