Dalle-Homme v. Superior Court Los Angeles County et al.
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
***9421
-
Filing Date:
04/01/2022
-
Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending
-
Case Type:
Other
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Statewide, California
Judge Details
Trial Court Judges
Riff, Lawrence
Gould-Saltman, Dianna
Party Details
Petitioner
Brody Dalle-Homme
Respondents
Superior Court Los Angeles County
Hon. Dianna J. Gould-Saltman
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Hon. Lawrence Riff
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Interested Party
Joshua Homme
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Petitioner Attorneys
Gregory Edwin Wolff
Attorney at California Appellate Law Group
96 Jessie Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Doreen Marie Olson
Attorney at Meyer Olson Lowy & Meyers LLP
10100 Santa Monica Blvd. Sute 1425
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Lisa Helfend Meyer
Attorney at Meyer Olson Loxy & Meyers, LLP
10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1425
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Claudia Ribet
Attorney at California Appellate Law Group LLP
811 Wilshire Blvd., 17Th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Pola Sharon Baumgold
Attorney at California Appellate Law Group
437 S Rexford Dr
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-4711
Respondent Attorney
Frederick Bennett
Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County
111 North Hill Street, Room 546
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Interested Party Attorneys
Susan E. Wiesner
Attorney at Susan E. Wiesner, ALC
9113 W. Sunset Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90069-3106
Herb Fox
Attorney at Law Office of Herb Fox
1114 State St. Suite 200
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.
Docket Entries
- 04/08/2022
-
DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final
[-] Read Less
- 04/08/2022
-
DocketDescription: Case complete.
[-] Read Less
- 04/08/2022
-
DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: The court has read and considered the petition for writ of mandate, including the exhibits, filed April 1, 2022, and the preliminary opposition, including the exhibits, filed April 7, 2022, and the reply filed April 8, 2022. The petition is denied. Petitioner fails to demonstrate that the respondent court abused its discretion in how it conducted the proceedings or in issuing its March 11, 2022, order.
[-] Read Less
- 04/08/2022
-
DocketDescription: Reply filed to:; Notes: Reply in support of petition for writ of mandate and/or prohibition and request for immediate stay.
[-] Read Less
- 04/07/2022
-
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Five volumes of exhibits to preliminary opposition to writ of mandate.
[-] Read Less
- 04/07/2022
-
DocketDescription: Opposition - opposition to petition; Notes: Real party in interest Joshua Homme's preliminary opposition to petition for writ of mandate and request immediate stay.
[-] Read Less
- 04/04/2022
-
DocketDescription: Association of attorneys filed for:; Notes: For real party in interest Joshua Homme.
[-] Read Less
- 04/04/2022
-
DocketDescription: Filed letter from:; Notes: Real party in interest Joshua Homme.
[-] Read Less
- 04/01/2022
-
DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.; Notes: Proof of Service.
[-] Read Less
- 04/01/2022
-
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Volumes 1 through 5.
[-] Read Less
- 04/01/2022
-
DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate (stay requested).
[-] Read Less
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases