Contreras et al. v. Danneco Construction & Services

DocketDescription: Mail returned, unable to forward.; Notes: From Rafael Contreras - remittitur

DocketDescription: Case complete.

DocketDescription: Remittitur issued.

DocketDescription: Petition for review denied in Supreme Court.; Notes: The petition for review is denied. [S273105]

DocketDescription: Supreme Court order filed re:; Notes: The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to and including May 10, 2022, or the date upon which review is either granted or denied. [S273105]

DocketDescription: Service copy of petition for review received.; Notes: Contreras

DocketDescription: Returned document for non-conformance.; Notes: Appellants' Requests to Waive Court Fees submitted Feb 9, 2022 via truefiling has been rejected. This appeal was dismissed on Dec 28, 2021.

DocketDescription: Substitution of attorneys filed for:; Notes: Attorney Ayinde A. Jones substitutes out as counsel of record for appellant Vilma Contreras. Appellant is now self-represented.

DocketDescription: Substitution of attorneys filed for:; Notes: Attorney Ayinde A. Jones substitutes out as counsel of record for appellant Rafael Contreras. Appellant is now self-represented.

DocketDescription: Returned document for non-conformance.; Notes: Appellants' Motion to Vacate Dismissal submitted Feb 4, 2022 via truefiling has been rejected. This appeal was dismissed on December 28, 2021. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b), the decision became final on January 27, 2022 - 30 days after filing of the order of dismissal.

DocketDescription: Letter sent to counsel re:; Notes: The clerk received and filed on January 24, 2022 appellant's motion to vacate the court's dismissal and reinstate appeal. An examination of the motion reveals that it was submitted by appellants instead of their counsel Ayinde A. Jones. If counsel no longer represents appellants, counsel must file either a substitution of attorney or a motion to withdraw in the reviewing court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 8.36(b)-(c).) The motion to vacate the dismissal and reinstate the appeal is stricken as not having been filed by counsel of record.

DocketDescription: Motion to vacate dismissal filed.; Notes: Appellant's motion to vacate dismissal.*Filing canceled per court's Jan 26, 2022 notice*

DispositionDescription: Dismissed per rule 8.100(c); Disposition Type: Final

DocketDescription: Appeal dismissed per rule 8.100(c).; Notes: It appearing that the appellant is in default pursuant to Rule 8.100(c), California Rules of Court, the appeal filed November 18, 2021, is dismissed. In addition the Court notes that appellant has also failed to file a Case Information Statement. (2DCA/APP-004)

DocketDescription: Returned document for non-conformance.; Notes: Appellants' documents submitted on Dec 22, 2021 were rejected. Appellants are represented by counsel. All parties are required to file documents electronically. (CRC, rule 8.71 (a)). You may resubmit your filing via TrueFiling.

DocketDescription: Appellant's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on:; Notes: notice filed 12/2/21 for NOA 11/18/21 - appellant proceeding without RTs;

DocketDescription: Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).; Notes: No fee received

DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Appeal filed on November 18, 2021 by Rafael Contreras et al.

DocketTrial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court; County: Los Angeles; Trial Court Case Number: 20STCV23049