This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 03/10/2023 at 00:01:49 (UTC).

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al.

Case Summary

On 10/13/2022 City of Los Angeles filed an Other lawsuit against Superior Court of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, Second Appellate District - Division 8 located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Hammock, Randolph. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.

Case Details Parties Dockets

Case Details

Case Number:
***3863

Filing Date:
10/13/2022

Case Status:
Pending - Other Pending

Case Type:

Other

Court:
California Courts of Appeal

Courthouse:
Second Appellate District - Division 8

County, State:
Statewide, California

Judge Details

Trial Court Judge

Hammock, Randolph

Party Details

Petitioner

City of Los Angeles

Respondents

Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Hon. Randolph Hammock

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Interested Party

Jacqueline Jones

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner Attorneys

Mark R. Irvine

Attorney at VANDERFORD & RUIZ, LLP

1510 Oxley Street Ste C

South Pasadena, CA 91030

Erin Emiko Uyeshima

Attorney at Vanderford & Ruiz, LLP

Park Center Bldg. 221 East Walnut Street, Suite 106

Pasadena, CA 91101-1554

Rodolfo Ruiz

Attorney at Vanderford & Ruiz, LLP

Park Center Bldg. 221 East Walnut Street, Suite 106

Pasadena, CA 91101-1554

Respondent Attorney

Frederick Bennett

Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County

111 North Hill Street, Room 546

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Interested Party Attorney

Nancy P. Doumanian

Attorney at Doumanian & Associates

837 South Fair Oaks Ave Suite 200

Pasadena, CA 91105

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

Docket Entries

10/20/2022

DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final We have read and considered the petition for writ of mandate filed on October 13, 2022. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate the superior court erred or that they are otherwise entitled to extraordinary relief. (See Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1266, 1269; Ordway v. Superior Court (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 98, 101; Whitney's at the Beach v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.App.3d 258, 266.) Accordingly, the petition is denied. STRATTON, P.J. WILEY, J. HARUTUNIAN, J.* *Judge of the San Diego County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

10/20/2022

DocketDescription: Case complete.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

10/20/2022

DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: We have read and considered the petition for writ of mandate filed on October 13, 2022. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate the superior court erred or that they are otherwise entitled to extraordinary relief. (See Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1266, 1269; Ordway v. Superior Court (1988) 198 Cal.App.3d 98, 101; Whitney's at the Beach v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.App.3d 258, 266.) Accordingly, the petition is denied. STRATTON, P.J. WILEY, J. HARUTUNIAN, J.* *Judge of the San Diego County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

10/13/2022

DocketDescription: Filed proof of service.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

10/13/2022

DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Volume three of exhibits.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

10/13/2022

DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Volumes 1, 2 and 4 through 9 of exhibits.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

10/13/2022

DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate.
[+] Read More [-] Read Less

Why is this public record being published online?