***0160
05/10/2022
Pending - Other Pending
Other
Statewide, California
Broadbelt, Robert
Cathay Bank
Superior Court of Los Angeles County
Hon. Robert Broadbelt
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Crossroads Greenville Properties, LTD
Bob Yari
Parviz Yari
Forum General, Inc.
The Archer Holdings Company, Inc.
Stephen G. Larson
Attorney at Larson LLP
555 S. Flower St., Suite 4400
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065
Paul Anthony Rigali
Attorney at Larson O'Brien LLP
555 South Flower Street 4400
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Kimberly Elise Barreto
Attorney at Larson LLP
555 S Flower St. Ste 4400
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Frederick Bennett
Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County
111 North Hill Street, Room 546
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Daniel A. Platt
Attorney at Loeb & Loeb
10100 Santa Monica Blvd. Ste 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Robert Joseph Catalano
Attorney at Loeb & Loeb
10100 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Court documents are not available for this case.
DispositionDescription: Petition denied or dismissed after order to show cause issued.; Disposition Type: Final; Author: Baker, Lamar W.; Participants: Moor, Carl H. Rubin, Laurence D.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Case complete.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Petition denied or dismissed after order to show cause issued.; Notes: By way of an order filed June 28, 2022, the respondent court complied with the alternative writ of mandate issued June 3, 2022. Accordingly, the alternative writ is discharged, this court's previously entered stay of proceedings is dissolved, and the petition for writ of mandate, filed May 10,2022, is dismissed as moot. No costs are awarded in this proceeding.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Reply filed to:; Notes: Reply to the alternative writ issued June 3, 2022.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Written return filed.; Notes: re order dated June 3, 2022
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Alternative writ or OSC issued.; Notes: The court has read and considered the petition for writ of mandate filed May 10, 2022. The court tentatively concludes as follows. No court has yet held or deemed the jury trial waiver provision in the parties' contract to be unenforceable on an estoppel theory or otherwise. Absent such a determination of unenforceability, denial of petitioner's motion to appoint a judicial referee was necessarily premature because the key condition precedent, a holding of unenforceability, has not occurred. Therefore, after hearing the parties' positions on the matter pursuant to Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri v. Superior Court (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1233, 1250, footnote 10, you are ordered to either: (a) Vacate your March 30, 2022, order, and enter a new and different order determining whether the contractual jury trial waiver is unenforceable, and if so, whether petitioner's motion to appoint a judicial referee should be granted; or (b) Show cause before this court in its courtroom at 300 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90013, on September 6, 2022, why a peremptory writ ordering you to do so should not issue. The return to the petition shall be filed on or before July 1, 2022. Any reply to the return shall be filed on or before July 29, 2022. If you comply with this writ by selecting alternative (a) above, you are directed to provide this court with a copy of your minute order setting forth such compliance. Petitioners shall also provide this court with a copy of any such minute order upon receipt.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Three volumes of exhibits.
[-] Read LessDocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate.
[-] Read Less