This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 06/29/2022 at 00:35:25 (UTC).

Borja et al. v. City of San Jose

Case Summary

On 04/05/2021 Borja filed an Other lawsuit against City of San Jose. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Manoukian, Socrates. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ***8996

  • Filing Date:

    04/05/2021

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • County, State:

    Statewide, California

Judge Details

Trial Court Judge

Manoukian, Socrates

 

Party Details

Appellants and Plaintiffs

Eugenia Serrano Borja

Alex Borja

Defendants and Respondents

James Richard Brown

Lance Brown

Victor Bringas Construction

Enterprise Plan B, Inc.

City of San Jose

Diane Stember Richards

Voeks, Inc.

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Appellant and Plaintiff Attorneys

Hugh Robert Burns

Attorney at Sincltico & Burns

111 W Ocean Blvd Ste 2400

Long Beach, CA 90802-4653

John Phillip Boggs

Attorney at Fine Boggs Cope et al LLP

111 W. Ocean Blvd. Suite 2400

Long Beach, CA 90802

Defendant and Respondent Attorneys

Christian B. Nielsen

200 East Santa Clara St.

San Jose, CA 95113

Eric James Bengtson

1960 The Alameda Ste 210

San Jose, CA 95126-1451

Paul Christian Scheley

1111 Bayhill Drive Suite 300

San Bruno, CA 94066

Margo Laskowska

Attorney at Office of the City Attorney

City Of San Jose 200 East Santa Clara Street, 16Th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113

Kendra Elizabeth McGee-Davies

Attorney at Office of the City Attorney

200 East Santa Clara Street, 16Th Floor 16Th Floor

San Jose, CA 95113

J. Richard Doyle

Attorney at Office of the City Attorney

200 East Santa Clara Street 16Th Floor Tower

San Jose, CA 95113-1905

Amanda N. Griffith

2390 Professional Drive

Roseville, CA 95661

David Raymond Casady

2390 Professional Dr

Roseville, CA 95661

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 10/24/2022
  • HearingDescription: Exhibits returned to county clerk.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/12/2022
  • DocketDescription: Case fully briefed.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/12/2022
  • DocketDescription: Appellant's reply brief.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Alex Borja Attorney: John Phillip Boggs

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/12/2022
  • DocketBrief: Appellant's reply brief.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Appellant: Alex BorjaAttorney: John Phillip Boggs

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/03/2022
  • DocketDescription: Order filed.; Notes: Ruling on respondent's request for judicial notice is deferred for consideration with the merits of the appeal.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/27/2022
  • DocketDescription: Received copy of; Notes: Resp request for jud. notice and declaration. Respondent's brief.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/27/2022
  • DocketDescription: Exhibits lodged***************

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/22/2022
  • DocketDescription: Request for judicial notice filed.; Notes: Respondent's

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/22/2022
  • DocketDescription: Respondent's brief.; Notes: Defendant and Respondent: City of San Jose Attorney: Margo Laskowska

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/22/2022
  • DocketBrief: Respondent's brief.; Party Attorney: Defendant and Respondent: City of San JoseAttorney: Margo Laskowska

    Read MoreRead Less
12 More Docket Entries
  • 06/14/2021
  • DocketDescription: Received copy of document filed in trial court; Notes: Clerk's Certificate of Compliance The Appellant was notified of a failure to comply on June 10, 2021 and has now cured the default. Record preparation will now proceed.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • DocketDescription: Received copy of document filed in trial court; Notes: Clerk's Certificate of Compliance The Appellant was notified of a failure to comply on June 3, 2021 and has now cured the default. Record preparation will now proceed.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/10/2021
  • DocketDescription: Default notice received-appellant notified per rule 8.140(a)(1).; Notes: Appellant's Default Notice Deposit or Fee Waiver for reporter's transcript not timely deposited/filed. (Appellant already paid $80 for RT deposit but still owes $50 admin fee)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/08/2021
  • DocketDescription: Received copy of; Notes: Notice of Deposit Court Fees for the Reporter's Transcript and Designation of Reporter's Transcript

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/04/2021
  • DocketDescription: Received copy of document filed in trial court; Notes: Appellant's Default Notice Appellant Alex Borja et al, you are hereby notified as follows: Deposit or fee waiver for reporter's transcript not timely deposited/filed.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/27/2021
  • DocketDescription: Change of contact information filed for:; Notes: Contact information updated Margo Laskowska.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/23/2021
  • DocketDescription: Civil case information statement filed.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/16/2021
  • DocketDescription: Filing fee received from:; Notes: Appellant

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/09/2021
  • DocketDescription: Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/09/2021
  • DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Borja et al., filed 4/5/21

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where CITY OF SAN JOSE is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer J. Richard Doyle