Beverly Hills Gateway, L.P. v. Superior Court Los Angeles County
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
***0749
-
Filing Date:
06/18/2018
-
Case Status:
Disposed - Other Disposed
-
Case Type:
Other
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Statewide, California
Judge Details
Trial Court Judge
Raphael, Michael
Party Details
Petitioner
Beverly Hills Gateway, L.P.
Respondent
Superior Court Los Angeles County
Interested Party
Tufeld Corporation
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Petitioner Attorneys
Saul D. Brenner
Attorney at Loeb & Loeb, LLP
10100 Sana Monica Blvd. Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4164
Andrew S. Pauly
Attorney at Shoreline, A Law Corporation
1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 400
Santa Monica, CA 90401-1007
David Eric Hackett
Attorney at Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP
5900 Wilshire Blvd 12Th Fl
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Daniel G. Murphy
Attorney at Loeb & Loeb
1000 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Robin Meadow
Attorney at Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP
5900 Wilshire Blvd., 12Th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Damon Allen Thayer
Attorney at Shoreline, A Law Corporation
1299 Ocean Ave., Suite 400
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Respondent Attorneys
Hon. Michael J. Raphael
Los Angeles Superior Court 111 N. Hill St., Dept. 051
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Frederick Bennett
Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County
111 North Hill Street, Room 546
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Interested Party Attorneys
Sean Gerald McKissick
Attorney at Miller Barondess LLP
1999 Avenue Of The Stars Ste 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4632
James Lewis Goldman
Attorney at Miller Barondess LLP
1999 Avenue Of The Stars, Ste 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Court Documents
Court documents are not available for this case.
Docket Entries
- 06/29/2018
-
DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final
[-] Read Less
- 06/29/2018
-
DocketDescription: Case complete.
[-] Read Less
- 06/29/2018
-
DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: THE COURT: The court has read and considered the petition for writ of mandate and the motion for judicial notice filed June 18, 2018, and the preliminary opposition filed June 28, 2018. The motion for judicial notice is granted. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.252(a)(2)(B).) The petition is denied. Petitioner has an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal. (San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court (1996) 13 Cal.4th 893, 912-913.)
[-] Read Less
- 06/28/2018
-
DocketDescription: Default notice for responsive filing fee sent to:; Notes: Real party in interest.
[-] Read Less
- 06/28/2018
-
DocketDescription: Opposition filed.; Notes: Real Party in Interest's Preliminary Opposition to Petition for Writ of Manadte, Prohibition or Other Appropriate Relief.
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2018
-
DocketDescription: Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by:; Notes: Petitioner
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2018
-
DocketDescription: Motion filed.; Notes: Motion for Judicial Notice
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2018
-
DocketDescription: Exhibits filed in support of:; Notes: Appendix of Exhibits + Exhibits Volume 1 of 1
[-] Read Less
- 06/18/2018
-
DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate
[-] Read Less
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases