Archuleta v. McGraw et al.

DispositionDescription: Voluntary dismissal; Disposition Type: Final The court has read and considered appellant's request for dismissal of appeal, filed May 1, 2023. Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal filed September 30, 2022, is dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue the remittitur forthwith.

DocketDescription: Case complete.

DocketDescription: Remittitur issued.

DocketDescription: Dismissal order filed.; Notes: The court has read and considered appellant's request for dismissal of appeal, filed May 1, 2023. Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal filed September 30, 2022, is dismissed. The clerk is directed to issue the remittitur forthwith.

DocketDescription: Request for dismissal filed.; Notes: Appellant's Request for Dismissal of Appeal

DocketDescription: pro hac vice granted; Notes: The court has read and considered attorney Charles L. Babcock's March 21, 2023 application for admission pro hac vice for respondents Phillip C. McGraw, CBS Television Distribution, and Peteski Productions, Inc. Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that the application is granted.

DocketDescription: pro hac vice application; Notes: Attorney Charles L. Babcock for respondents.

DocketDescription: Granted - extension of time.

DocketDescription: Requested - extension of time

DocketDescription: Record on appeal filed.; Notes: ELEVEN: Clerks (3165 Pages), TWO: reporters.

DocketDescription: Respondent's notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on:; Notes: Notice dated Oct. 13, 2022

DocketDescription: Letter sent to counsel re:; Notes: This Court has received appellant's notice of appeal. The case has been assigned the above referenced number. Any counsel who are not licensed to practice in the State of California and intend to appear in or file any documents with this Court must first file an application to appear pro hac vice pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(c)(2). This application must be made to this Court regardless of any previous order granting pro hac vice appearance filed in the trial court. A new application to appear as counsel pro hac vice made to this Court must conform to California Rules of Court, Rule 8.54. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40(e), payment of the required fee is to be made to California State Bar and a statement regarding payment must be indicated in the application to this Court.

DocketDescription: Association of attorneys filed for:; Notes: notice of association of counsel filed by respondents - Neil Tardiff will be co-counsel for respondents.

DocketDescription: Civil case information statement filed.; Notes: Plaintiff and Appellant: Hannah Archuleta Attorney: Gloria R. Allred Attorney: Marcus John Spiegel Attorney: Olivia Flechsig

DocketBrief: Civil case information statement filed.; Party Attorney: Plaintiff and Appellant: Hannah ArchuletaAttorney: Gloria R. Allred Attorney: Marcus John Spiegel Attorney: Olivia Flechsig

DocketDescription: Filing fee.; Notes: Check #61129 for $775.

DocketDescription: Default notice sent-appellant notified per rule 8.100(c).; Notes: No fee rcvd.

DocketDescription: Notice of appeal lodged/received.; Notes: Notice of appeal filed on September 30, 2022 by Hannah Archuleta.

DocketTrial Court Name: Los Angeles County Superior Court; County: Los Angeles; Trial Court Case Number: 21STCV38489; Trial Court Judge: Bowick, Stephanie