This case was last updated from California Courts of Appeal on 06/26/2022 at 14:13:29 (UTC).

510PacificAve, etc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al.

Case Summary

On 05/12/2022 510PacificAve, etc filed an Other lawsuit against Superior Court of Los Angeles County. This case was filed in California Courts of Appeal, Second Appellate District - Division 4 located in Statewide, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Mooney, Mark. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
Case Details Parties Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    ***0264

  • Filing Date:

    05/12/2022

  • Case Status:

    Pending - Other Pending

  • Case Type:

    Other

  • County, State:

    Statewide, California

Judge Details

Trial Court Judge

Mooney, Mark

 

Party Details

Petitioner

510PacificAve, ETC.

Respondents

Superior Court of Los Angeles County

Hon. Mark V. Mooney

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Interested Party

Amy Rebecca Weiss

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Petitioner Attorney

Robert L. Miller

Attorney at Miller & Miller

3183 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 196K19

Los Angeles, CA 90010-1211

Respondent Attorney

Frederick Bennett

Attorney at Superior Court of Los Angeles County

111 North Hill Street, Room 546

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Interested Party Attorney

Farzad Tabatabai

Attorney at Tabatabai & Miyamoto, APC

11111 Santa Monica Blvd. Suite 1700

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Court Documents

Court documents are not available for this case.

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/09/2022
  • DispositionDescription: Petition summarily denied by order; Disposition Type: Final THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate, prohibition, or alternative relief has been read and considered and is denied on the ground that petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to the relief requested. (Code Civ. Proc., 170.6, subd. (a)(2); Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1266, 1273.)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/09/2022
  • DocketDescription: Case complete.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/09/2022
  • DocketDescription: Order denying petition filed.; Notes: THE COURT:* The petition for writ of mandate, prohibition, or alternative relief has been read and considered and is denied on the ground that petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to the relief requested. (Code Civ. Proc., 170.6, subd. (a)(2); Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1266, 1273.)

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/16/2022
  • DocketDescription: Letter sent to:; Notes: all counsel: The following matter is being transferred between divisions pursuant to California Rule of Court 10.1000(b)(1)(A). From Division Eight to Division Four: B320264, 510PacificAve, etc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al. Division Four had the related cases, 510PacificAve v. Weiss, (B304369) and 510PacificAve v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (B289549). In the interest of uniformity of decision and judicial economy, the matter is transferred to Division Four.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 05/12/2022
  • DocketDescription: Filed petition for writ of:; Notes: Mandate.

    Read MoreRead Less
related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a litigant

Latest cases represented by Lawyer TABATABAI FARZAD