On 10/31/2017 VICKY MCCLOUD filed a Personal Injury - Other Personal Injury lawsuit against A-P COTEAU INC BHARPUR-GAGANDEEP DH. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is LAURA A. SEIGLE. The case status is Pending - Other Pending.
****1646
10/31/2017
Pending - Other Pending
Los Angeles County Superior Courts
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
Los Angeles, California
LAURA A. SEIGLE
MCCLOUD VICKY
A-P COTEAU INC. BHARPUR-GAGANDEEP DH.
DOES 1 TO 100
SIMOUDIS THANOS ESQ.
ANDERSEN SUSAN K
LUCAS TIMOTHY DEAN
7/10/2019: [Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Person
7/25/2019: Stipulation - No Order
4/16/2019: Answer
4/4/2019: Notice
3/20/2019: Stipulation and Order
3/8/2019: Stipulation and Order
9/17/2018: STIPULATION TO CORRECT NAME OF DEFENDANT IN COMPLAINT, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT, AND ALL OTHER PLEADINGS AND PAPERS ON FILE HEREIN;
9/26/2018: SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
1/16/2018: CIVIL DEPOSIT
1/16/2018: Unknown
8/20/2018: NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION OF COUNSEL
12/18/2017: PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
10/31/2017: CoverSheet
10/31/2017: Summons
10/31/2017: Complaint
Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department 4B at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; : OSC RE Dismissal
Hearingat 08:30 AM in Department 4B at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Jury Trial
Hearingat 10:00 AM in Department 4B at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012; Final Status Conference
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
DocketStipulation - No Order (to continue trial); Filed by Vicky McCloud (Plaintiff)
Docket[Proposed Order] and Stipulation to Continue Trial, FSC (and Related Motion/Discovery Dates) Personal Injury Courts Only (Central District); Filed by A AND P Coteau, Inc. Erroneously Sued As A-P Coteau Inc. Bharpur-Gagandeep Dh. (Defendant)
Docketat 08:30 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Jury Trial - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
Docketat 10:00 AM in Department 4B, Laura A. Seigle, Presiding; Final Status Conference - Not Held - Continued - Stipulation
DocketAnswer (AMENDED); Filed by A AND P Coteau, Inc. Erroneously Sued As A-P Coteau Inc. Bharpur-Gagandeep Dh. (Defendant)
DocketAssociation of Attorney; Filed by A AND P Coteau, Inc. Erroneously Sued As A-P Coteau Inc. Bharpur-Gagandeep Dh. (Defendant)
DocketCIVIL DEPOSIT
DocketNotice of Case Relocation Rescheduling; Filed by Plaintiff
DocketReceipt; Filed by A AND P Coteau, Inc. Erroneously Sued As A-P Coteau Inc. Bharpur-Gagandeep Dh. (Defendant)
DocketAnswer; Filed by A AND P Coteau, Inc. Erroneously Sued As A-P Coteau Inc. Bharpur-Gagandeep Dh. (Defendant)
DocketProof-Service/Summons; Filed by Vicky McCloud (Plaintiff)
DocketPROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS
DocketComplaint; Filed by Vicky McCloud (Plaintiff)
DocketSummons; Filed by null
DocketComplaint
Case Number: BC681646 Hearing Date: February 18, 2020 Dept: 27
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES
On June 5, 2019, Defendant A-P Couteau Inc. Bharpur-Gagandeep DH propounded supplemental interrogatories on Plaintiff Vicky McCloud. On December 17, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to compel further responses to the supplemental interrogatories. On January 14, 2020, the parties participated in an informal discovery conference and agreed that Plaintiff would provide further responses by January 24, 2020. Plaintiff never provided those further responses, and so Defendant proceeded with this motion. Plaintiff did not file an opposition to this motion.
The supplemental interrogatories requested updates to previous form and special interrogatory responses. Plaintiff responded she had no further responses or amendments to her responses. The responses to form interrogatory Nos. 6.4, 6.5, 6.6 continued many instances where Plaintiff stated “To be determined” in response to a questions about the charges to date for health care providers. At this point, two years and three months after filing this action, Plaintiff should know the costs to date for her medical treatment. According, the motion to compel as to form interrogatories is GRANTED.
Special interrogatory No. 10 asked for the last date Plaintiff received treatment by a health care provider as a result of injuries from the incident. Plaintiff did not provide a date. The motion to compel as to No. 10 is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is to provide further responses within 20 days of the date of this order.
Defendant seeks sanction against Plaintiff and her counsel. The Court GRANTS the request and imposes sanctions against Plaintiff and her counsel, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,145, to be paid with 20 days of the date of this order.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative.